JUS 375 (all milestones and journal paper)

JUS 375 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric

Prompt: In this milestone, you will complete the first in a series of reviews challenging you to wear the hat of a criminal justice practitioner and offer analysis of
the situation based on case law research. The scenario provided will also be addressed as Section VII of your final project.
Read the scenario and then provide a short analysis based on the questions that follow.
Jim Aiken
Jim Aiken comes home early from work and finds his wife in bed with the mailman. He immediately shoots and kills the mailman. Aiken then goes
downstairs, makes himself a sandwich, and watches TV while his wife is frozen in fear in bed. After two hours, Aiken goes back upstairs and shoots and kills
his wife. You have been tasked with preparing the case for his defense attorney.
A. Applying the appropriate sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry, what crime did Aiken commit regarding the mailman, and
what possible defense could be used?
B. What crime did Aiken commit regarding his wife, and what possible defense could be used? Support your response by explaining how you applied
the scientific methods of inquiry.

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be about one page long and must use double spacing, 12?point Times New Roman font, and one?inch margins.
Include appropriate scholarly sources to support your ideas. In?text citations and the reference list should be formatted according to APA style.

 

JUS 375 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric

Prompt: For this milestone, you will analyze two more case study scenarios and provide your insights into how each case should be handled. The scenarios will
also be addressed as Sections I and V of your final project.
Read the scenarios and then provide a short analysis based on the questions that follow.
Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery and
shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!” One
month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda rights.
Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A. Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the
Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B. Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision?making process?
Hinckley
On March 30, 1981, John Hinckley attempted to kill President Reagan. There were several witnesses to the shooting, and the evidence was overwhelming.
Research this case and imagine yourself as Hinckley’s defense attorney.
A. Apply the Model Penal Code test to this case to determine Hinckley’s mental state defense and what the jury’s verdict would have to be. Be sure to
defend your response.
B. After the Hinckley verdict was reached, many states opted for a new test to be utilized. The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 shifted the burden
of proof from prosecution to defense. Apply the present statutory test to the case. How do you believe the jury would vote if Hinckley were tried
today? Why?
C. What historical milestone case involving the Second Amendment emerged from the events of this situation? How has this case impacted the
criminal justice practitioner?

Guidelines for Submission: Your paper must be about two to three pages long and must use double spacing, 12?point Times New Roman font, and one?inch
margins. Include appropriate scholarly sources to support your ideas. In?text citations and the reference list should be formatted according to APA style.

JUS 375 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric

Overview

To be an effective criminal justice practitioner, one must understand the evolution of criminal law and the criminal justice system. One needs to know not only
how a criminal statute is developed but also how it applies in the field. It is vital that an awareness exists of all aspects of criminal law—including how to conduct
a proper arrest, how to use emerging technology in conducting investigations, how U.S. Supreme Court rulings are applied, and how case preparation is done.
One must be cognizant of the available defenses as well as the criminal states of mind. Although there are many opportunities within the criminal justice field,
the tie that binds them is criminal law, and a solid comprehension is a necessity for success.
The final project for this course will allow you to see yourself in a range of criminal justice practitioner roles. Each position will require you to address different
issues and concerns indicative of that area of criminal justice—some requiring research, others requiring you to apply methods of inquiry, all leading to the
creation of a case analysis portfolio.
The final project is supported by two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final
submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two and Four. The final submission will occur in Module Seven.
In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:
• Illustrate the major historical milestones of criminal law in the United States for their impact on the criminal Justice system and the role of
the practitioner
• Evaluate constitutional parameters set by courts for their influence on the performance of law?enforcement agencies
• Evaluate the impact of emerging technology on the development of an ethical criminal investigation
• Apply the sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry to determine a defendant’s mental state and possible criminal
defenses for case preparation

Prompt

For the final assessment, you will need to imagine yourself in a variety of criminal justice practitioner roles. You will be presented with a series of case scenarios
and will be required to address each of them by utilizing case law research. You will then have to make decisions based on your findings, evidence, and any
procedural knowledge you have obtained throughout the course.

The final submission will require you to respond to each one of the following situations and compile them together for a case analysis portfolio.
Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed:
I. Miranda
A uniformed police officer is dispatched to a bank robbery. Upon arrival, John Smith is already under arrest by the detectives for committing the robbery
and shooting the guard. He is placed in the back of the officer’s cruiser. During the drive back to the station, Smith yells out, “I am so sorry I shot him!”
One month later, the officer is called to testify about Smith’s statement. Smith’s defense attorney argues that the officer failed to read him his Miranda
rights. Consider if his statements are admissible given the fact he was not read his Miranda Rights prior to making them.
A. Imagine yourself as the judge presiding over this case. Clearly and accurately evaluate the constitutional parameters that emerged from the
Miranda decision. How has this case influenced the practice of law enforcement?
B. Describe your ruling for the bank robbery case, citing the Miranda case. How did Miranda influence your decision?making process?
II. Jewelry Store Robbery
A detective was conducting surveillance outside a jewelry store that had been robbed several times in the past month. It was 85°F outside, and he
witnessed three men pacing in front of the store who appeared to be acting nervous. One of the men was wearing a heavy sweatshirt (later identified as
Wilson), while the others were wearing t?shirts. The detective exited his cruiser and approached the three men. The detective conducted a pat frisk of
Wilson and found a hard object in the front pocket of the sweatshirt. He reached his hand into the pocket and located a handgun. He placed all three
under arrest and later tied all of them to the repeat burglaries. In court, Wilson’s attorney argued that the detective conducted an illegal search when he
located the handgun. Imagine yourself now as the judge.
A. In order to avoid defense attorneys making this kind of claim in court, new technology could be utilized to aid in the development of cases and in
prosecutions. What types of new technology could the detective have employed in his surveillance and arrest that might have helped avoid the
defense attorney’s claim of illegal search? Evaluate the impact these types of technology have had on ethical investigations.
B. Based on the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), how would you rule in this case? Be sure to defend your ruling with
evidentiary support.
C. Did the ruling justices’ decision in Terry v. Ohio influence the effective performance of law?enforcement agencies? Defend your position using
evidence from the current case as well as the Supreme Court case.

III. Rape Investigation
You are now a detective assigned to conduct a rape investigation.
A. Select an emerging technology available for investigating rape?related crimes. How has this technology positively or negatively impacted
criminal investigations? Support your argument(s) using specific examples.

B. Taking into consideration U.S. Supreme Court rulings, what are any limitations or regulations you may encounter in utilizing this technology to
conduct an ethical investigation?

IV. Pre?Sentence Investigation
A 14?year?old juvenile was just convicted of murder, and sentencing is approaching. Imagine yourself as a probation officer assigned to conduct the
presentence investigation. Research Miller v. Alabama and use it to guide you on how you would approach this case.
A. Based on Miller v. Alabama, what are the constitutional constraints placed upon the judge to come to an ethical and proper sentence in the
current case?
B. How did the Miller v. Alabama case transform sentencing laws and impact the role of the criminal justice practitioner? Support your response
with examples.

V. Hinckley
On March 30, 1981, John Hinckley attempted to kill President Reagan. There were several witnesses to the shooting, and the evidence was
overwhelming. Research this case and imagine yourself as Hinckley’s defense attorney.
A. Apply the Model Penal Code test to this case to determine Hinckley’s mental state defense and what the jury’s verdict would have to be. Be sure
to defend your response.
B. After the Hinckley verdict was reached, many states opted for a new test to be utilized. The Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1984 shifted the
burden of proof from prosecution to defense. Apply the present statutory test to the case. How do you believe the jury would vote if Hinckley
were tried today? Why?
C. What historical milestone case involving the Second Amendment emerged from the events of this situation? How has this case impacted the
criminal justice practitioner?

VI. Defense Attorney
You are a defense attorney. You have a client who is charged with raping and killing four boys. After killing them, he dismembered them and ate them.
Your client thinks he did nothing wrong.
A. Based on the client’s mental state, what would you argue for a defense for the client? Ensure that you apply and explain any relevant sociological
and criminological scientific methods of inquiry you would use in devising your argument.

VII. Jim Aiken
Jim Aiken comes home early from work and finds his wife in bed with the mailman. He immediately shoots and kills the mailman. Aiken then goes
downstairs, makes himself a sandwich, and watches TV while his wife is frozen in fear in bed. After two hours, Aiken goes back upstairs and shoots and
kills his wife. You have been tasked with preparing the case for his defense attorney.

A. Applying the appropriate sociological and criminological scientific methods of inquiry, what crime did Aiken commit regarding the mailman, and
what possible defense could be used?
B. What crime did Aiken commit regarding his wife, and what possible defense could be used? Support your response by explaining how you
applied the scientific methods of inquiry.

VIII. Narcotics Detective
Imagine yourself as a narcotics detective. You are told by an informant that a man by the name of Joe Parker is growing marijuana in his basement. He
goes on to tell you that the basement has windows, but they appear to be blacked out, preventing anyone from seeing inside. As a knowledgeable
narcotics detective, you know that extreme heat is used to keep the marijuana plants healthy. You decide to use a thermal imaging device to see if
there is excessive heat coming from the basement. You park in front of his house and turn on the device. It registers extreme levels of heat emanating
from the basement. Based on that information, you obtain a search warrant and locate the marijuana. In preparing your paperwork, it is brought to
your attention that these events are identical to an actual U.S. Supreme Court case. Research Kyllo v. United States, 533 U.S. 27 (2001), to guide how
you would approach this case.
A. What elements from Kyllo v. United States will impact your ability to develop an ethical investigation? Be sure to explain your response.
B. Examine how the use of thermal imaging technology has impacted detectives, both positively and negatively, in performing ethical
investigations in drug?related cases?
C. If you were the judge in the Kyllo case, what would be the constitutional parameters that would influence how you would rule? Why would
these influence your ruling?

IX. Homicide Detective
A detective investigating a recent homicide has obtained a mobile scanner device called a Manta Ray, which allows him to sit in his vehicle and “capture”
conversations and data from mobile phones by mimicking a cellular tower. After two days of surveillance on an apartment complex that he believes
houses the man who committed the murder, the device grabs pieces of a text conversation between the suspect and his girlfriend. The detective
believes the conversation was a vague confession to the crime and decides it is enough to obtain a court order.
A. Was the use of the Manta Ray in this investigation done ethically, and how will this potentially impact the development of this case? Consider
supporting your response with relevant case law and precedent.

Milestones

Milestone One: Jim Aiken
In Module Two, you will submit a short paper that invites you to wear the hat of a criminal justice practitioner and offer analysis of a criminal situation based on
case law research. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric.

Milestone Two: Miranda and Hinckley
In Module Four, you will submit short paper that evaluates the constitutional parameters of two other cases and the ways you can influence the decision?
making process of the court. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric.
Final Project Submission: Case Analysis Portfolio
In Module Seven, you will submit your completed analysis of all nine case study scenarios. Your work should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained
throughout the course on your milestone submissions. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric.

Final Project Rubric

Guidelines for Submission: Your submission should be six to eight pages in length. The document should use double spacing, 12?point Times New Roman font,
and one?inch margins. Citations should be listed in APA format. Be sure to label each section appropriately (Miranda, Jewelry Store Robbery, etc.) when
compiling your portfolio.

 

JUS 375 Journal One Rubric

Overview: Journals in this course are private between the student and the instructor. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply
what you learn each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on
your educational and professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you
the opportunity to further develop these skills.
Prompt: After reviewing the articles on Whitey Bulger and Al Capone, write a journal assignment in which you discuss how state and/or federal
practitioners’ goals have evolved over time subsequent to these cases in terms of charging decisions and punishment. Refer to your textbook and relevant
scholarly sources to support the points and observations made in your journal assignment.
Guidelines for Submission: Your journal assignment must be 300–400 words (excluding the references). Citations should be formatted according to APA style.
Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.

 

JUS 375 Journal Two Rubric

Overview: Journals in this course are private between the student and the instructor. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply
what you learn each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on
your educational and professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you
the opportunity to further develop these skills.
Prompt: Read Report to the Attorney General on Delays in Forensic DNA Analysis. Then write a journal assignment in which you answer the following questions:
? Should DNA testing be mandatory in all cases where DNA is collected? Why or why not? Do you agree with the report’sfindings?
? From the report, which recommendation would you prioritize, ifyou were given the opportunity to implement it within your state or department? Why?
Refer to your textbook and relevant scholarly sources to support the points and observations made in your journal assignment.
Guidelines for Submission: Your journal assignment must be 300–400 words (excluding the references). Citations should be formatted

 

JUS 375 Journal Three Rubric

Overview: Journals in this course are private between the student and the instructor. Approach these activities as (a) an opportunity to reflect upon and apply
what you learn each week based on the assigned readings, discussions, and activities, and (b) an opportunity to share your knowledge and expertise based on
your educational and professional experiences in the past. As a successful professional, you will need good reflective and writing skills. Journal activities offer you
the opportunity to further develop these skills.
Prompt: Jasper robs the home of Peter and Carly, two meth dealers. He steals expensive jewelry, meth equipment, and meth. You are the assigned detective to
the robbery and receive a reliable tip that Jasper has stashed the goods in his home. You want to use thermal imaging to detect the presence of the stolen items.
A senior detective advises you that you do not need a warrant. Based upon your reading of Kyllo v. United States, what should you do? How does the court’s
decision reinforce ethical behavior and constitutional limits on law-enforcement officers? Write a journal assignment that addresses these questions. Refer to
your textbook and relevant scholarly sources to support the points and observations made in your journal assignment.
Note: Kyllo v. United States is also referenced in your final project. Review of this case will also support Section VIII of your final project.
Guidelines for Submission: Your journal assignment must be 300–400 words (excluding the references). Citations should be formatted according to APA style.
Submit assignment as a Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, and one-inch margins.