Attachment # 00001561 - Week_2_Summary_Assignment_1.docx
Week_2_Summary_Assignment_1.docx (26.37 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
Summary AssignmentSally StudentDeVry UniversitySummary PrewritingTheme: EducationTopic: No Child Left Behind/Race to the TopTitle: Dictating to the Schools: A Look at the Effect of the Bush and Obama Administrations on Schools. Ravitch is likely against too much government influence on schools and feels that government control is detrimental. Intended audience: The intended audience is primarily professionals in the field of education and education policy, including teachers and school administrators. However, parents with school-aged children and citizens interested in education reform or education policy could also be included as part of the audience. Writer’s background: Ravitch is an educational researcher and a former professor.Writer’s angle: Any discussion regarding how to best implement education reform in our schools is arguable, especially when the subject of standardized testing is involved. Individuals will hold different views on the topic depending on their political backgrounds, affiliations with education policy, and position on standardized testing. Ravitch is opposed to the use of standardized tests and believes they have a negative effect on schools. Part 1: The one-sentence summaryRavitch (2011), U.S. Department of Education’s Assistant Secretary of Education, criticizes the Obama administration for following Bush’s No Child Left Behind policy, explaining that the government places an overreliance on standardized test scores and teaching to the test over rich curriculum and true reform for underachieving schools. Part 2: The one-paragraph summaryRavitch (2011), U.S. Department of Education’s Assistant Secretary of Education, warns that the Obama administration’s control over education reform continues much of the same agenda introduced by the Bush administration’s No Child Left Behind policy. Ravitch argues these policies are focused on standardized tests and providing incentives to teachers who produce students with high test scores. While she notes that the policy stigmatizes low performing schools and holds them to unattainable goals, she calls for less government control of education reform and more need for well-educated teachers who are provided with support, professional evaluation, and strong curriculum. Part 3: The multiple-paragraph summary Ravitch (2011), U.S. Department of Education’s Assistant Secretary of Education, criticizes the Obama administration’s Race to the Top education policy agenda for following what she calls the “disaster” of Bush’s No Child Left Behind policy. Government control of education, she notes, has only led public schools to rely heavily on standardized test scores. Ravitch warns that, under the Obama administration, teachers are provided incentives and raises based on test performance, which results in class time being spent teaching test-taking skills or teaching to the test rather than on rich curriculum. Additionally, Ravitch criticizes the Obama administration’s reliance on charter schools as a way of reforming underperforming public schools, explaining that charters don’t answer the real challenges that face low-income or non-native speaking student populations. In the end, she warns that the outcome will produce students who are not able to comprehend complex knowledge and schools that limit history, science, the arts, civics, and many other components of the curriculum that provide college preparatory instruction. Ravitch notes that the United States, compared to other nations, is not following a model that will produce effective change. She explained, “High-performing nations make sure that students have access to a rich and balanced curriculum, not just a steady diet of test preparation and testing” (p. 8).Part 4: Your reactionRavitch is right in her assessment of the Obama administration’s educational reform plans. As threats are made to close low-performing schools, Race to the Top provides little explanation in terms of how underprivileged communities will experience any positive education reform. Additionally, I agree with Ravitch’s criticism of incentivizing teachers whose students produce high test scores. This seems to only put more focus on teaching to the test rather than providing students with a well-rounded curriculum that offers broad skills and critical thought. As a research professor and the Assistant Secretary of the U.S. Department of Education, Ravitch is well positioned to call upon reform that focuses more on improved teaching, additional resources, and stronger curriculum over more government control. Part 5: ReferenceRavitch,D. (2011). Dictating to the schools: A look at the effect of the Bush and Obama administration on schools. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 76(8), 4–9.

PERILS OF SOCIAL NETWORKING

Question # 00020300 Posted By: mpdavis45 Updated on: 07/19/2014 08:53 PM Due on: 07/20/2014
Subject English Topic General English Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

Information Literacy Assignment (35 points)

The purpose of this assignment is to learn about information literacy by exploring the concept of peer review. You may be familiar with peer review in prior writing courses, but what does it mean when you talk about peer review in relation to academic source material?

Click on the following link to a DeVry University Library presentation of Peer Reviewed Journals: The Creation of New Knowledge. http://library.devry.edu/pdfs/Peer_Review_PPT.pdf

The PDF presentation contains 20 slides that will introduce the peer review cycle.

After reviewing the presentation, compose a 2-paragraph response in which you address each of the following points:

  • In your own words, identify points in the peer review cycle that seem especially important and explain why.
  • How does an editor differ from a peer reviewer? Use at least two points to support your response.
  • Based on this information, explain whether your article for this week was peer reviewed? How can you determine this information?
  • As you work on your research in this class, where specifically can you look to find peer-reviewed information?

Submit your completed assignment to the Week 2 Dropbox. For instructions on how to use the Dropbox, read these step-by-step instructions or watch this TutorialDropbox Tutorial.

See the Syllabus section "Due Dates for Assignments & Exams" for due date information.

Source Summary (100 points)

The purpose of the Source Summary is to effectively summarize and attribute information from a source. Use the library databases to retrieve an article from the Course Theme Reading List on the topic you selected last week. If you are considering a new topic, confirm your choice with your professor. Once you retrieve the article, print it or save a local copy of the full text article to your hard drive so that you can refer to the contents of the article offline. (If the source is from the textbook, this step does not apply.) Read the source carefully, noting the thesis, topic sentences, headings, supporting details, and the conclusion. To become more skilled at summary and paraphrasing, you will practice writing summaries of different lengths on the same assigned source.

For each part of the assignment, follow the instructions provided in Doc Sharing. When you are finished, save the document as <your last name.Wk2 Summary Assignment> and submit it to the Dropbox by the end of the week.

See Doc Sharing for the following support documents.

  • An assignment template
  • A sample assignment
  • The assignment grading rubric

View the tutorial on formatting a Word document, which can be found in THE|HUB.

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00019752 Posted By: neil2103 Posted on: 07/20/2014 07:44 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Devry Eng135 week 2 assignment...
    Attachments
    devry_eng135_week_2_sourse_summary.docx (24.86 KB)
    Information_Literacy_Assignment.docx (12.24 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa