Attachment # 00010569 - Rubric_2.docx
Rubric_2.docx (17.85 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
Rubric Name: Assignment #2CriteriaOutstandingSuperiorGoodSubstandardFailureContent: Questions Reflect 21st century skills, traits and abilities1.6 points10+ questions demonstrate candidates existing and 21st leadership skills(1.44 - 1.6)1.36 points10 questions address all 21stcentury skills, etc.(1.28 - 1.439)1.2 pointsMost of the 10 questions address the 21st century skills, etc. (1.12 - 1.279)1.04 points10 or fewer questions presented and 3 or less reflect the 21st century skills, etc.(0.96 - 1.119)0 pointsNo questions reflect 21stcentury skills, abilities, traits of a leader(0 – 0.959)Content: Identification of 21st century leadership skills, traits, and abilities in business context1.8 pointsFact pattern analyzed to identify CEO’s desired 21st century skills, traits, abilities and additional skills etc. for job(1.62 - 1.8)1.53 pointsFact pattern analyzed to identify the CEO’s desired 21stcentury skills, traits, abilities for job (globalization trust, etc.);(1.44 - 1.619)1.35 pointsFact pattern analyzed to identify the CEO’s desired skills, traits, abilities for job but discussion did not focus on 21st century skills etc. (globalization, trust, etc.)(1.26 -1.439)1.17 pointsFact pattern analyzed to identify some (2-3) of CEO’s desired skills, traits, abilities for job (globalization trust, etc.)(1.08 - 1.259)0 pointsDid not identify CEO’s desired skills, traits, abilities  for job from fact pattern (globalization, trust, role in organization, styles, change agent)(0 - 1.049)Content: Questions Reflect 21st century skills, traits and abilities1.8 pointsFact pattern analyzed to identify CEO’s desired 21st century skills, traits, abilities and additional skills etc. for job(1.62 - 1.8)1.53 pointsFact pattern analyzed to identify the CEO’s desired 21stcentury skills, traits, abilities for job (globalization trust, etc.);(1.44 - 1.619)1.35 pointsFact pattern analyzed to identify the CEO’s desired skills, traits, abilities for job but discussion did not focus on 21st century skills etc. (globalization, trust, etc.)(1.26 -1.439)1.17 pointsFact pattern analyzed to identify some (2-3) of CEO’s desired skills, traits, abilities for job (globalization trust, etc.)(1.08 - 1.259)0 pointsDid not identify CEO’s desired skills, traits, abilities  for job from fact pattern (globalization, trust, role in organization, styles, change agent)(0 - 1.049)Content: Answers show how a candidate comprehends 21st century leadership skills etc.1.8 pointsDiscussion regarding answers shows an in-depth understanding of the 21st century skill set for the job(1.62 - 1.8)1.53 pointsDiscussion regarding answers shows complete understanding of the 21st century skill set for the job(1.44 - 1.619)1.35 pointsDiscussion regarding answers mostly shows understanding of the 21stcentury skill set for the job(1.26 -1.439)1.17 pointsDiscussion regarding answers shows little to some understanding of the 21stcentury skill set for the job(1.08 - 1.259)0 pointsDiscussion regarding answers does not show any understanding of the 21st century skill, trait or ability needed for the job(0 - 1.049)Critical Thinking/Reasoning4 pointsConcepts and ideas are fully developed. Thinking is consistent in accurately interpreting questions and material/provides solid assumptions, reasoning and evaluation with sound conclusions. Reader can easily follow the author's logic and reasoning.(3.6 - 4)3.4 pointsConcepts and ideas are developed. Thinking is mostly consistent in accurately interpreting questions and material/ provides good assumptions, reasoning and evaluation with sound conclusions. Reader can easily follow the author's logic and reasoning. (3.2 - 3.59 )3 pointsConcepts and ideas are mostly developed but may need clarification on some aspects of thinking, reasoning or evaluation.  Conclusions are drawn.  Reader follows the author’s logic but occasionally there are areas that are unclear.(2.8 - 3.19)2.6 pointsConcepts and ideas are not cohesive.   Misinterprets questions or material; ignores or superficially evaluates, justifies little and seldom explains reasoning; draws unwarranted conclusions.  At times, the reader must attempt to determine the author's train of thought.   (2.4 -2.79)0 pointsConcepts and ideas are not fully developed or presented in a cohesive manner. Misinterprets questions or material.(0 – 2.39)Application of Resources4 pointsArguments or positions are well-supported with evidence from the course readings and independent research; conclusions go beyond the course material and recognize implications and extensions of the material and concepts.(3.6 - 4)3.4 pointsArguments or positions are mostly supported by evidence from course readings; conclusions presented demonstrate understanding of the material and concepts and external resources(3.2 - 3.59)3 pointsArguments are more often based on opinion or unclear views than on position grounded in material; Some course reading material used; some conclusions show an understanding of the course material and external resources(2.8 - 3.19)2.6 pointsArguments are frequently illogical and unsubstantiated; no use of essential primary source material to support argument; Material to support arguments from secondary source material; May resort to ad hominem instead of making meaningful application of the material(2.4 - 2.79)   0 pointsArguments lack meaningful explanation or support of ideas.  Does not provide facts presented in case study. Failure to use primary source material to support arguments(0 – 2.39)Attention to Instructions2 pointsdemonstrated full understanding of requirements responded to each aspect of assignment(1.8 - 2.0)1.7 pointsdemonstrated understanding of requirements; missed one minor aspect of assignment(1.6 - 1.79)1.5 pointsdemonstrated some understanding of requirements; missed a key element or two minor aspects of assignment(1.4 - 1.59)1.3 pointsfailed to show a firm understanding of requirements; missed two key elements or several minor aspects of assignment(1.2 - 1.39)0 pointsdid not demonstrate understanding of assignment requirements(0 – 1.19)Writing Mechanics2 pointsStrictly adheres to standard usage rules of written English, including but not limited to capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  No errors found.  No jargon used.(1.8 - 2)1.7 pointsAdheres to standard usage of mechanics:  conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  One to three errors found.(1.6 - 1.79)1.5 pointsMinimally adheres to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  Four to 10 errors found.(1.4 - 1.59)1.3 pointsDoes not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of written English, including capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.  More than 10 errors found.(1.2 - 1.39)0 pointsDoes not adhere to standard usage rules of mechanics:  conventions of written English largely incomprehensible and errors are too plentiful to count.(0 – 1.19)APA Style (6th ed.)1 pointNo APA style errors; Proper citation of source material is used throughout paper. Reference titles follow APA with only the first word, the first word after a colon and proper nouns capitalized.(.09 - 1)0.85 pointsAttempts in-text citations and reference list but one or two APA style errors noted.(0.8 - 0.89)0.75 pointsAttempts in-text citations and reference lists; APA style errors are noted; inconsistencies in citation usage are noted throughout document.(0.7 - 0.79)0.65 pointsAttempts either in-text citations or reference list but omits the other.(0.6 - 0.69)0 pointsNo attempt at APA style.(0 – 0.59)Overall ScoreOutstanding18 or moreSuperior16 or moreGood14 or moreSubstandard12 or moreFailure0 or more
Tutorials for this Question
  1. neil2103
    Tutorial # 00473669 Posted By: neil2103 Posted on: 02/04/2017 09:01 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Business Mgmt Project 2...
      Get the Solution
    Attachments
    Interview_Questions.docx (24.98 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa