QSO500 Milestone One---- paper

QSO 500 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview: In this final project, you will create a research report based on the application of action research processes for developing problem solving strategies. In designing the report, you will follow the best practices for ethical research. You will utilize the research process to inform decisions in your professional life and as a framework for approaching research projects in other courses in your program. The final product will be a comprehensive research report using the five-step research process (identify the problem; understand the theoretical framework of the problem; design the research study; collect, explain, and analyze the data; report the results; and make conclusions and recommendations).
For Milestone One, submit a draft of your business problem and literature review. Using the problem you identified in your Module One journal and the feedback you received, describe the research problem including the context in which it exists. Using the problem statement, describe the stakeholders and research objective. Based on the research objective, develop a research question that clearly and concisely articulates in one sentence the purpose of the study. Consider the key real or potential ethical issues or challenges of the study.
After describing your business problem and research question, prepare a comprehensive literature review that carefully and thoughtfully examines the research problem from a scholarly perspective using a minimum of seven quality sources. A minimum of three of the sources must be selected from scholarly, peer- reviewed journals. Other quality sources can be professional publications or magazines, internal corporate publications such as annual reports or white papers, or established news sources.
Prompt: Refer to the given case study Maruti Suzuki India: Defending Market Leadership in the A-Segment and select a data-driven business problem that can be addressed using action research to be the basis for your research report. Prepare a comprehensive literature review that carefully and thoughtfully examines the research problem from a scholarly perspective using a minimum of seven quality sources. A minimum of three of the sources must be selected from scholarly, peer-reviewed journals. Other quality sources can be from professional publications or magazines, internal corporate publications such as annual reports or white papers, or established news sources.
Specifically the following critical elements must be addressed:
Business Problem: Refer to the given case study and select a data-driven business problem that can be addressed using action research to be the basis for your research report.
A.Describe the research problem, including the context in which it exists. In other words, what caused or precipitated this problem? What has already been done to address it?
B.Describe the key stakeholders (or potential stakeholders) of your business problem. In other words, who are the people who have the most to gain or lose from a decision?
C.Explain the research objective. How would it benefit the stakeholder to know the results?
D.Develop a research question based on the research objective that clearly and concisely articulates in one sentence the purpose of the study.
E.Discuss the key real or potential ethical issues or challenges of the study. Consider the following: How will data be collected and protected? How will human subjects be used, treated, and protected?
Literature Review:
A.Explain the theories that best ground your organizational problem. Support your explanation with specific examples. These theories might be management, behavioral, social, and/or business related.
B.Discuss the bias and limitations present in the relevant literature and the potential impact these may have on your research.
C.Summarize at least one other research study that has faced this challenge that could potentially be replicated and applied to your research study.
D.From the literature, analyze at least one other organization that has faced similar problems, explaining what they have done to address the problem.
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission: Your milestone must be submitted as a 5- to 6-page Microsoft Word document with double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and at least seven sources cited in APA format.
Critical Elements |
Proficient (100%) |
Needs Improvement (75%) |
Not Evident (0%) |
Value |
Business Problem: |
Describes the research problem, |
Describes the research |
Does not describe the research |
9 |
Research Problem |
including the context in which it |
problem, but description is |
problem |
|
|
exists |
cursory or does not include the |
|
|
|
|
context in which the problem |
|
|
|
|
exists |
|
|
Business Problem: |
Describes all key stakeholders of |
Describes the stakeholders of |
Does not describe the |
9 |
Stakeholders |
the business problem |
the business problem, but |
stakeholders of the business |
|
|
|
description is cursory or |
problem |
|
|
|
neglects to address all key |
|
|
|
|
stakeholders |
|
|
Business Problem: |
Explains the research objective, |
Explains the research objective, |
Does not explain the research |
9 |
Research Objective |
including how this research |
but explanation is cursory or |
objective |
|
|
would benefit the stakeholder |
does not show how this |
|
|
|
|
research would benefit the |
|
|
|
|
stakeholder |
|
|
Business Problem: |
Develops a research question |
Develops a research question |
Does not develop a research |
9 |
Research Question |
based on the research objective |
based on the research |
question based on the research |
|
|
that clearly and concisely |
objective, but it does not |
objective |
|
|
articulates in one sentence the |
clearly or concisely articulate in |
|
|
|
purpose of the study |
one sentence the purpose of |
|
|
|
|
the study |
|
|
Business Problem: |
Discusses all key real or |
Discusses real or potential |
Does not discuss real or potential |
12 |
Ethical Issues |
potential ethical issues or |
ethical issues or challenges of |
ethical issues or challenges of the |
|
|
challenges of the study |
the study, but discussion is |
study |
|
|
|
cursory, contains issues of |
|
|
|
|
clarity, or neglects to address |
|
|
|
|
key ethical issues |
|
|
Literature Review: |
Explains the theories that best |
Explains the theories that best |
Does not explain the theories that |
12 |
Theories |
ground the organizational |
ground the organizational |
best ground the organizational |
|
|
problem with support from |
problem, but explanation is |
problem |
|
|
specific examples |
cursory or not supported with |
|
|
|
|
specific examples |
|
|
Literature Review: |
Discusses the bias and |
Discusses the bias and |
Does not discuss the bias and |
12 |
Bias and Limitations |
limitations present in the |
limitations present in the |
limitations present in the relevant |
|
|
relevant literature, including the |
relevant literature, but |
literature |
|
|
potential impact on research |
discussion contains issues of |
|
|
|
|
clarity or does not address the |
|
|
|
|
potential impact on research |
|
|
Literature Review: |
Summarizes another research |
Summarizes another research |
Does not summarize another |
12 |
Other Research Study |
study that has faced this |
study that has faced this |
research study that has faced this |
|
|
challenge that could potentially |
challenge that could potentially |
challenge that could potentially |
|
|
be replicated and applied to |
be replicated and applied to |
be replicated |
|
|
your research study |
your research study, but |
|
|
|
|
summary is cursory or contains |
|
|
|
|
inaccuracies |
|
|
Literature Review: |
Analyzes another organization |
Analyzes another organization |
Does not analyze another |
12 |
Other Organization |
that has faced similar problems, |
that has faced similar |
organization that has faced |
|
|
including an explanation of |
problems, but analysis is |
similar problems |
|
|
what was done to address the |
cursory or does not explain |
|
|
|
problem |
what was done to address the |
|
|
|
|
problem |
|
|
Articulation of |
Submission has no major errors |
Submission has major errors |
Submission has critical errors |
4 |
Response |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
related to citations, grammar, |
|
|
spelling, syntax, or organization |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
spelling, syntax, or organization |
|
|
|
that negatively impact |
that prevent understanding of |
|
|
|
readability and articulation of |
ideas |
|
|
|
main ideas |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
100% |

-
Rating:
5/
Solution: QSO500 Milestone One---- paper