grand adm614 weke 3 assignment
Details:
Write an essay of 1,000-1,250 words regarding public goods. Include the following:
1 Explain what a public good is.
2 Discuss how a public good is different than a private good.
3 Discuss whether only government can supply a public good.
4 What are the challenges related to public goods.
5 How should the “free rider” problems be addressed?
Be sure to cite at least three relevant scholarly sources in support of your content. These sources can include trade journals and think tank reports. Use only sources found at the Library or those provided in Topic Materials.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
1 Unsatisfactory 0.00% | 2 Less than Satisfactory 74.00% | 3 Satisfactory 79.00% | 4 Good 87.00% | 5 Excellent 100.00% | ||
70.0 % Content | ||||||
20.0 % Write an essay 1,000-1,250 words regarding public goods. Include the following, 1. Explain what a public good is. | Essay does not explain what a public good is. | Essay somewhat explains what a public good is. The topic is skimmed over and is lacking depth of any kind. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic. | Essay explains what a public good is with some level of depth; explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic. | Essay explains what a public good is with accurate details and evidence; explanation provides analysis with clear evidence to support claims. | Essay explains what a public good is with quality details and factual evidence; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic. | |
10.0 % 2. Discuss how a public good is different than a private good. | Essay does not discuss how a public good is different than a private good. | Essay somewhat discusses how a public good is different than a private good. The topic is skimmed over and is lacking depth of any kind. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic. | Essay discusses how a public good is different than a private good with some level of depth; explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic. | Essay discusses how a public good is different than a private good with accurate details and evidence; explanation provides analysis with clear evidence to support claims. | Essay discusses how a public good is different than a private good with quality details and factual evidence; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic. | |
10.0 % 3. Discuss whether only government can supply a public good. | Essay does not discuss whether only government can supply a public good. | Essay somewhat discusses whether only government can supply a public good. The topic is skimmed over and is lacking depth of any kind. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic. | Essay discusses whether only government can supply a public good with some level of depth; explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic. | Essay discusses whether only government can supply a public good with accurate details and evidence; explanation provides analysis with clear evidence to support claims. | Essay discusses whether only government can supply a public good with quality details and factual evidence; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic. | |
10.0 % 4. What are the challenges related to public goods? | Essay does not discuss challenges related to public goods. | Essay somewhat discusses challenges related to public goods. The topic is skimmed over and is lacking depth of any kind. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic. | Essay discusses challenges related to public goods with some level of depth; explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic. | Essay discusses challenges related to public goods with accurate details and evidence; explanation provides analysis with clear evidence to support claims. | Essay discusses challenges related to public goods with quality details and factual evidence; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic. | |
10.0 % 5. How should the free rider problems be addressed? | Essay does not discuss how the free rider problems should be addressed. | Essay somewhat discusses how the free rider problems should be addressed. The topic is skimmed over and is lacking depth of any kind. Demonstrates poor understanding of topic. | Essay discusses how the free rider problems should be addressed with some level of depth; explanation is limited and lacks some evidence to support claims. Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic. | Essay discusses how the free rider problems should be addressed with accurate details and evidence; explanation provides analysis with clear evidence to support claims. | Essay discusses how the free rider problems should be addressed with quality details and factual evidence; explanation is comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Demonstrates an exceptional understanding of topic. | |
10.0 % Utilize the GCU Library to locate at least three relevant, scholarly sources in support of the content. | No outside sources are cited. | Some sources may be cited but they are not scholarly and/or relevant. | At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a loosely connected, vague way. | At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited in a well-connected way that clearly support claims. | At least three relevant, scholarly sources are cited and are flawlessly integrated into the essay to support the claims made therein. | |
20.0 % Organization and Effectiveness | ||||||
10.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions | Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed. | Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident. | Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. | A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. | There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless. | |
10.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. | Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | |
10.0 % Format | ||||||
5.0 % Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | Appropriate template is not used or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. | Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. | Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. | Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. | All format elements are correct. | |
5.0 % Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment) | No reference page is included. No citations are used. | Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. | Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. | Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and style is usually correct. | In-text citations and a reference page are complete. The documentation of cited sources is free of error. | |
100 % Total Weightage |
-
Rating:
/5
Solution: grand adm614 weke 3 assignment