Attachment # 00008081 - Assignment11.docx
Assignment11.docx (15.92 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
Assignment 2: Case Study – Ockham Technologies: Living on the Razor’s Edge Due Week 6, Day 7 (Weight: 17%) Referencing the Ockham Technologies: Living on the Razor’s Edge case study, write a 5page paper in which you do the following: Determine how the current fund-raising efforts will affect the formation of Ockham’s board of directors. Determine which board-related factors Triandiflou should consider when deciding which financing offer to accept. Discuss how you would handle the increasing tension between you and Mike Meisenheimer if you were Jim Triandiflou. Determine if Ockham should outsource its system-development efforts, and if so, to which company, and if not, how it should it complete development of the system for IBM. Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements: Typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12) with one-inch margins on all sides; references must follow JWMI style guide and writing format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length. The following are specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment: Synthesize the basic components of a business plan. Evaluate the competitive landscape, sales, and distribution channels for new business ventures. Use technology and information resources to research issues in new business ventures and entrepreneurship. Write clearly and concisely about new business ventures and entrepreneurship using proper writing mechanics. Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following grading criteria. Weight: 17% Assignment 2: Ockham Technologies: Living on the Razor’s Edge Criteria Unsatisfactory Low Pass Pass High Pass Honors 1. Determine how the current fundraising efforts will affect the formation of Ockham’s board of directors. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely determined how the current fund-raising efforts will affect the formation of Ockham’s board of directors. Partially determined how the current fundraising efforts will affect the formation of Ockham’s board of directors. Satisfactorily determined how the current fundraising efforts will affect the formation of Ockham’s board of directors. Completely determined how the current fundraising efforts will affect the formation of Ockham’s board of directors. Exemplarily determined how the current fundraising efforts will affect the formation of Ockham’s board of directors. 2. Determine which boardrelated factors Triandiflou should consider when deciding which financing offer to accept. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely determined which boardrelated factors Triandiflou should consider when deciding which financing offer to accept. Partially determined which boardrelated factors Triandiflou should consider when deciding which financing offer to accept. Satisfactorily determined which boardrelated factors Triandiflou should consider when deciding which financing offer to accept. Completely determined which boardrelated factors Triandiflou should consider when deciding which financing offer to accept. Exemplarily determined which boardrelated factors Triandiflou should consider when deciding which financing offer to accept. 3. Discuss how you would handle the increasing tension between you and Mike Meisenheimer if you were Jim Triandiflou. Weight: 20% Did not submit or incompletely discussed how you would handle the increasing tension between you and Mike Meisenheimer if you were Jim Triandiflou. Partially discussed how you would handle the increasing tension between you and Mike Meisenheimer if you were Jim Triandiflou. Satisfactorily discussed how you would handle the increasing tension between you and Mike Meisenheimer if you were Jim Triandiflou. Completely discussed how you would handle the increasing tension between you and Mike Meisenheimer if you were Jim Triandiflou. Exemplarily discussed how you would handle the increasing tension between you and Mike Meisenheimer if you were Jim Triandiflou. Weight: 17% Assignment 2: Ockham Technologies: Living on the Razor’s Edge Criteria Unsatisfactory Low Pass Pass High Pass Honors 4. Determine if Ockham should outsource its systemdevelopment efforts, and if so, to which company, and if not, how it should it complete development of the system for IBM. Weight: 30% Did not submit or incompletely determined if Ockham should outsource its systemdevelopment efforts, and if so, to which company, and if not, how it should it complete development of the system for IBM. Partially determined if Ockham should outsource its systemdevelopment efforts, and if so, to which company, and if not, how it should it complete development of the system for IBM. Satisfactorily determined if Ockham should outsource its systemdevelopment efforts, and if so, to which company, and if not, how it should it complete development of the system for IBM. Completely determined if Ockham should outsource its systemdevelopment efforts, and if so, to which company, and if not, how it should it complete development of the system for IBM. Exemplarily determined if Ockham should outsource its systemdevelopment efforts, and if so, to which company, and if not, how it should it complete development of the system for IBM. 5. Clarity, logic, and writing mechanics. Weight: 10% Multiple mechanical errors or much of the text is difficult to understand and fails to follow formatting instructions. The text does not flow. Several mechanical errors make parts of the text difficult for the reader to understand; the text does not flow or the discussion fails to justify conclusions and assertions More than a few mechanical errors; text flows but lacks conciseness or clarity; assertions and conclusions are generally justified and explained. Few mechanical errors; text flows and concisely and clearly expresses the student’s position in a manner that rationally and logically develops the topics. No mechanical errors; text flows and concisely and clearly expresses the student’s position in an exemplary manner that rationally and logically develops the topics.
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Davidcharles
    Tutorial # 00129020 Posted By: Davidcharles Posted on: 11/15/2015 07:21 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Case Study Analysis...
      Get the Solution
    Attachments
    Assignment_two.docx (18.94 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa