Attachment # 00006714 - MGMT673_PAPER_RUBRIC.docx
MGMT673_PAPER_RUBRIC.docx (41.53 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
MGMT_673_Research_Paper_Rubric You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. MGMT_673_Research_Paper_Rubric CriteriaRatingsPts APA and Capstone Format 1798_7584 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description (Excellent - A) Current APA formats were followed. Writer made no errors in grammar or spelling that distracted the reader from the content. All sentences sounded natural and were easy-on-the-ear when read aloud. Each sentence was clear and had an obvious emphasis. The writer used vivid words and phrases that lingered or drew pictures in the reader's mind, and the choice and placement of the words seemed accurate, natural, and not forced.20 pts blank Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Satisfactory - B) Writer made 1-10 errors in general APA format that distracted the reader from the content. Writer made 1-5 errors in grammar or spelling that distracted the reader from the content. Almost all sentences sounded natural and were easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but 1 or 2 were stiff and awkward or difficult to understand. The writer used vivid words and phrases that lingered or drew pictures in the reader's mind, but occasionally the words were used inaccurately or seemed overdone.18 pts 1798_8971 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Passing - C) Writer made11-20 errors in APA format that distracted the reader from the content. Writer made 6-10 errors in grammar or spelling that distracted the reader from the content. Most sentences sounded natural and were easy-on-the-ear when read aloud, but several were stiff and awkward or were difficult to understand. The writer used words that communicated clearly, but the writing lacked variety, punch or flair.16 pts blank_2 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Failing - F) Writer made more than 20 errors in APA format that distracted the reader from the content. Writer made more than 10 errors in grammar or spelling that distracted the reader from the content. The sentences were difficult to read aloud because they sounded awkward, were distractingly repetitive, or difficult to understand. The writer used a limited vocabulary that did not communicate strongly or capture the reader's interest. Jargon or clichés were present and detracted from the meaning.14 pts 1798_5855 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 20 pts-- Topic 1798_494 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description (Excellent - A) There was one clear, well-focused topic. The main idea stood out and was supported by detailed information. All supportive facts were reported accurately. Relevant, telling, quality details gave the reader important information that went beyond the obvious or predictable.20 pts 1798_8151 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Satisfactory - B) Main idea was clear but the supporting information was general. Most supportive facts were reported accurately. Supporting details and information were relevant, but one key issue or portion of the storyline was unsupported.18 pts 1798_103 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Passing - C) Main idea was somewhat clear but there was a need for more supporting information. Some supportive facts were reported accurately. Supporting details and information were relevant, but several key issues or portions of the storyline were unsupported.16 pts 1798_1106 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Failing - F) The main idea was not clear. There was a seemingly random collection of information. NO facts were reported OR most were inaccurately reported. Supporting details and information were typically unclear or not related to the topic.14 pts 1798_59 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 20 pts-- Quality of Information 1798_4893 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description (Excellent - A) Balanced presentation of relevant and legitimate information that clearly supports a central purpose or argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains important insights. References are primarily peer reviewed professional journals or other approved sources. The reader is confident that the information and ideas can be trusted.20 pts 1798_8330 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Satisfactory - B) Information provides reasonable support for a central purpose or argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of a significant topic. Reader gains some insights. Although most of the references are professionally legitimate, a few are questionable (e.g., trade books, Internet sources, popular magazines. The reader is uncertain of the reliability of some of the sources.18 pts 1798_7422 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Passing - C) Information supports a central purpose or argument at times. Analysis is basic or general. Reader gains few insights. Most of the references are from sources that are not peer reviewed and have uncertain reliability. The reader doubts the accuracy of much of the material presented.16 pts 1798_6142 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Failing - F) Central purpose or argument is not clearly identified. Analysis is vague or not evident. Reader is confused or may be misinformed. There are virtually no sources that are professionally reliable. The reader seriously doubts the value of the material and stops reading.14 pts 1798_3667 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 20 pts-- Support of Ideas/Critical Analysis 1798_8156 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description (Excellent - A) Exceptionally critical, relevant, consistent connections among arguments, analysis, subtopics, & thesis/topic; excellent, appropriate conclusions.20 pts 1798_769 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Satisfactory - B) Consistent connections made among analysis of evidence, subtopics, arguments & thesis/topic; good and generally appropriate conclusions.18 pts 1798_2173 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Passing - C) Some connections made among analysis of evidence, subtopics, arguments & thesis/topic; limited or somewhat inappropriate conclusions.16 pts 1798_1490 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Failing - F) Limited connections made among analysis of evidence, subtopics, counterarguments & thesis/topic; complete lack of or inappropriate conclusions.14 pts 1798_361 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 20 pts-- Conclusions and Recommendation 1798_2465 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description (Excellent - A) The conclusion(s) reached were correct and supported research. The recommendations were logical from the results of the study. The conclusion was strong and left the reader with a feeling that he/she understood what the writer was "getting at."20 pts 1798_8584 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Satisfactory - B) The conclusion(s) reached were logical but not fully supported by the research. The recommendations were not clear or only marginally related to the study. The conclusion was recognizable and tied up almost all the loose ends.17 pts 1798_7933 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Passing - C) The conclusion(s) was (were) vague and hard to follow and left many question for the reader. The recommendations were vague and difficult to follow. The conclusion was recognizable, but did not tie up several loose ends.15 pts 1798_4837 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating (Failing - F) There were no conclusions stated the related to the research. The recommendations were poorly worded or not related to the subject of the study. There was no clear conclusion, the paper just ends.13 pts 1798_4579 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 20 pts-- Description of criterion view longer description threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Full Marks5 pts blank Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating No Marks0 pts blank_2 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 5 pts--
COUNTRY ANALYSIS

COUNTRY ANALYSIS

Question # 00086822 Posted By: Sirkonate Updated on: 07/30/2015 11:51 AM Due on: 08/01/2015
Subject Economics Topic Macroeconomics Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

PLEASE WRITE MY COUNTRY ANALYSIS FOR MY MGMT673. I WILL NEED A MAXIMUM OF 3 PAGES ONLY NOT INCLUDING THE REFERENCE. APA FORMAT.

You’ve just been promoted to Senior Economic Analyst in the Market Planning Department for one of the world’s premier airlines. Congratulations! Recent reports in the financial press have led the Vice President for Market Planning to question the prospects traffic growth and profitability on routes to one of the many international destinations your airline serves. You’ve been asked to provide an assessment within the next few days highlighting probable effects to the country’s economy and implications for your airline’s profits.

YOU MAY SELECT ANY COUNTRY THAT FASCINATES YOU. 

Dot Image
Attachments
A4_Country_Analysis_Guidance.docx (35.35 KB)
MGMT673_PAPER_RUBRIC.docx (41.53 KB)
Tutorials for this Question
  1. spqr
    Tutorial # 00081446 Posted By: spqr Posted on: 08/01/2015 01:32 AM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of COUNTRY ANALYSIS...
      Get the Solution
    Attachments
    Russian_Airlines.docx (20.01 KB)
  2. GrandMaster
    Tutorial # 00128039 Posted By: GrandMaster Posted on: 11/13/2015 05:05 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of A++ SOLUTION PAPER...
      Get the Solution
    Attachments
    Global_economic_analysis.doc (96.5 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa