Attachment # 00006446 - LGMT_536_CASE_STUDY_RUBRIC.docx
LGMT_536_CASE_STUDY_RUBRIC.docx (41.67 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
LGMT 536 5.4 DMS Case Study Rubric You've already rated students with this rubric. Any major changes could affect their assessment results. LGMT 536 5.4 DMS Case Study Rubric CriteriaRatingsPts Identification and Analysis of the Main Issues/ Problem 8347_7045 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description Excellent (A) 28 - 30 Points: Problem identified and comprehensively analyzed.30 pts blank Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Satisfactory (B) 25 - 27 Points: Problem not clearly identified but is analyzed.27 pts 8347_4295 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Passing (C) 22 to 24 Points: Problem not clearly identified and analysis is incomplete.24 pts blank_2 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Failing (F) 0 - 21 Points: Problem is not identified or analyzed.21 pts 8347_7061 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 30 pts-- Recommendations 8347_6739 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description Excellent (A) 23 - 25 Points: Conclusions are sound and recommendations are appropriate.25 pts 8347_424 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Satisfactory (B) 21 - 22 Points: Conclusions are sound and recommendations are mostly appropriate.22 pts 8347_7664 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Passing (C) 18 - 20 Points: Conclusions are not completely sound and/ or recommendations are somewhat appropriate.20 pts 8347_2571 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Failing (F) 0 - 17 Points: Conclusions and recommendations are missing or not appropriate.17 pts 8347_3010 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 25 pts-- Links to Course Readings and Additional Research 8347_9482 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description Excellent (A) 14 - 15 Points: Excellent research into the issues with clearly documented links to class readings and appropriate outside materials.15 pts 8347_9272 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Satisfactory (B) 12 - 13 Points: Proficient research into the issues with clearly documented links to class readings or appropriate outside materials, but not both.13 pts 8347_975 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Passing (C) 10 - 11 Points: Limited research or documented links to course readings or appropriate outside materials.11 pts 8347_3431 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Failing (F) 0 - 9 Points: No research or documented links to course readings or appropriate outside materials.9 pts 8347_7900 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 15 pts-- Style & Mechanics 8347_1674 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description Excellent (A) 14 - 15 Points: Chooses words for their precise meaning and uses an appropriate level of specificity. Sentence style fits audience and purpose. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused. Almost entirely free of errors in spelling, grammar, and punctuation.15 pts 8347_8684 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Satisfactory (B) 12 - 13 Points: Uses words accurately and effectively but may be too general. Sentences are for the most part clear, structured, and focused, though some may be awkward or ineffective. May contain a few errors, which may annoy the reader but does not impede understanding.13 pts 8347_8762 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Passing (C) 10 - 11 Points: Uses relatively vague and general words and may use some inappropriate language. Sentence's structure is generally correct but sentences may be wordy, unfocused, repetitive, or confusing. Usually contains several spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors which may temporarily confuse the reader but not impede overall understanding.11 pts 8347_5821 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Failing (F) 0 - 9 Points: Misuse of words and awkward sentences throughout. Contains many errors in spelling, grammar, and/ or punctuation.9 pts 8347_6267 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 15 pts-- Formatting 8347_5495 view longer description threshold: pts Edit criterion description Excellent (A) 13 - 15 Points: Follows current APA formatting for layout, references, and citations.15 pts 8347_7943 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Satisfactory (B) 10 - 12 Points: Follows current APA formatting for layout, with some errors in references and citations.12 pts 8347_4105 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Passing (C) 1 - 9 Points: Some errors noted in layout, references, and citations in regards to current APA format.9 pts 8347_2802 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating Failing (F) 0 Points: Paper is not formatted in current APA style.0 pts 8347_3731 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 15 pts-- Description of criterion view longer description threshold: 5 pts Edit criterion description Full Marks5 pts blank Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating No Marks0 pts blank_2 Edit rating Delete rating Add new rating category after current rating This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion. pts   / 5 pts--
CASE ANALYSIS

CASE ANALYSIS

Question # 00079259 Posted By: Sirkonate Updated on: 07/02/2015 11:54 PM Due on: 07/04/2015
Subject Business Topic International Business Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image
During the Midterm Exam, you will be assigned one of the following two cases to use for your Case Analysis:
  • The Global Sourcing Wire Harness Division
  • Managing Supplier Quality: Integrated Devices

Once you have received your assignment and reviewed the case, provide a 3 - 5 page written report of the alternatives. The report is evaluated based on the following criteria:

  • Providing an adequate summary, problem definition and hypothesis leading to substantive analysis and alternative recommendations. (10 points)
  • Using correct grammar and evidence of proofreading (i.e., no spelling errors); overall formatting (10 points):
    • Times New Roman, 12 pt. Font
    • Double Spaced
    • Meets total page requirements
    • APA Style Citations and References
  • Identifying why the recommendations are important to the field (40 points)
  • Including findings, lessons learned, or best practices that can be applied to improve the management of the analysis function. (40 points)

The Case Analysis is worth 100 points and 5% of your grade. Review the rubric for grading guidelines. Your instructor may provide written feedback while grading this assignment.

Dot Image
Attachments
LGMT_536_CASE_STUDY_RUBRIC.docx (41.67 KB)
Tutorials for this Question
  1. mac123
    Tutorial # 00073979 Posted By: mac123 Posted on: 07/03/2015 12:02 AM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of CASE ANALYSIS...
      Get the Solution
    Attachments
    Integrated-Devices.docx (29.75 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa