Discussion - Decision and Remedy: A state intermediate

Question # 00837420 Posted By: wildcraft Updated on: 01/18/2023 09:40 PM Due on: 01/19/2023
Subject Law Topic General Law Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

For this Discussion Question, read and think critically about Case 17.1: Bass-Fineberg Leasing, Inc. v. Modern Auto Sales, Inc. in your textbook. 

Decision and Remedy: A state intermediate appellate court affirmed the lower court’s order. The contract between Cipriani and Allie was void because Cipriani could not assign his rights under the lease without Bass-Fineberg’s written consent. Because the contract was void, the parties were to be returned to their pre-contract status, which included a refund of the $5,000 payment.

The repairs to the bus cost $1,341.50. Who should pay this amount? Why?

Article Source: 

Bass-Fineberg Leasing, Inc. v. Modern Auto Sales, Inc., Justia Law (2015). https://law.justia.com/cases/ohio/ninth-district-court-of-appeals/2015/13ca0098-m.html

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00832875 Posted By: wildcraft Posted on: 01/18/2023 09:41 PM
    Puchased By: 2
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Discussion - Decision and Remedy: A state intermediate...
    Attachments
    Discussion_-_Decision_and_Remedy_A_state_intermediate.ZIP (18.96 KB)

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Whatsapp Lisa