BUS520 ASSIGNMENT 3 POSITION PAPER: POWER, POLITICS, AND CULTURE
ASSIGNMENT 3

POSITION PAPER: POWER, POLITICS, AND CULTURE
Due Week 8, worth 250 points
Power and politics greatly influence an organization’s culture. In business, the culture can make or break an organization’s productivity. In this assignment, you’ll analyze the ways power and politics have influenced an organization’s culture. You’ll apply best practices you learned in course resources and your own research to make recommendations for improving this organization’s culture.
PREPARATION
Using the same organization from the first two assignments, imagine the CEO has now requested your task force investigate the influence of power and politics on the corporate culture. You have been asked to prepare a position paper that presents and supports your recommendations to improve the culture.
Prepare for this assignment by delving into the organization's culture and identi-fying the resources you, the task force leader, will use to create your research-supported position paper. Use at least two quality resources such as the course textbook, company website, business websites (CNBC, Bloomberg, etc.), resources from the Strayer Library, and/or outside sources.
Note: Wikipedia and web-based blogs do not qualify as credible resources.
INSTRUCTIONS
Develop your position paper, addressing the following components:
1. Influence of Politics and Power
Explain how politics and power-play may have influenced the organization’s culture.
2. Sources of Power
Explore the sources of power and describe how management could use this influence to benefit your department and improve organizational performance.
3. Leadership Behavior and Culture
Make recommendations that support how the study of power and politics could influence leadership behavior and improve the organization’s culture.
4. Leadership Influence
Discuss the importance and complexity of leadership behavior. How does it influence organizational structure and performance?
5. Executive Summary
Prepare an executive summary that presents your recommendations for ways in which the organization could build a stronger culture. Note:An executive summary is a condensed version of your fullreport. It should summarize briefly all the main points in concise paragraphs. It should be written clearly and should use language appropriate for the audience.
PROFESSIONAL AND APA FORMATTING REQUIREMENTS
Your assignment must follow these general APA formatting requirements:
Be typed (five to seven pages recommended,
excluding cover and reference pages), double-spaced, using Times New Roman font
(size 12) with one-inch margins on all sides
Include a References List
Include a cover page containing the title of
the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and
the date
Include in-text citations following APA style,
using attributive tags and signal verbs
Cite at least two credible sources
POINTS:
250

Criteria

1. Influence of Politics and Power
Weight: 20%
ASSIGNMENT 3: POSITION PAPER: POWER, POLITICS, AND CULTURE

|
Unacceptable |
Fair |
Proficient |
Exemplary |
|||
|
Below 70% F |
70-79% C |
80-89% B |
90-100% A |
|||
|
Does not |
Partially |
Satisfactorily |
Completely |
|||
|
explain how |
explains how |
explains how |
explains how |
|||
|
politics and |
politics and |
politics and |
politics and |
|||
|
power-play |
power-play may |
power-play may |
power-play may |
|||
|
may have |
have influenced |
have influenced |
have influenced |
|||
|
influenced the |
the organiza- |
the organiza- |
the organiza- |
|||
|
organization’s |
tion’s culture. |
tion’s culture. |
tion’s culture. |
|||
|
culture. |
Identifies some |
Identifies some |
Accurately |
|||
|
issues but |
core issues and |
identifies the |
||||
|
does not fully |
connects them |
core issues and |
||||
|
explore them or |
to the impact |
strongly con- |
||||
|
make a strong |
on the culture. |
nects them to |
||||
|
connection to |
The explana- |
the impact on |
||||
|
their impact. |
tion uses |
culture. The |
||||
|
Uses little |
research |
explanation is |
||||
|
research |
support |
well-supported |
||||
|
support. |
by research. |
|||||
|
2. Sources of |
Does not identi- |
Partially identi- |
Satisfactorily |
Completely |
||||
|
Power |
fy the sources |
fies the sourc- |
identifies the |
identifies the |
||||
|
of power or |
es of power |
sources of |
sources of |
|||||
|
Weight: 20% |
describe how |
and describes |
power and |
power and |
||||
|
management |
how manage- |
describes how |
describes how |
|||||
|
could use this |
ment could use |
management |
management |
|||||
|
influence to |
this influence |
could use this |
could use this |
|||||
|
enhance organi- |
to enhance |
influence to |
influence to |
|||||
|
zational perfor- |
organizational |
enhance organi- |
enhance organi- |
|||||
|
mance. There is |
performance. |
zational perfor- |
zational perfor- |
|||||
|
no reference to |
Not all key |
mance. Most |
mance. Uses |
|||||
|
research |
concepts are |
key concepts |
relevant key |
|||||
|
identified and |
are accurately |
concepts and |
||||||
|
there is a loose |
identified and |
makes valid |
||||||
|
connection to |
there is a con- |
connections to |
||||||
|
performance. |
nection to |
enhanced |
||||||
|
There is little |
enhanced per- |
performance |
||||||
|
research |
formance with |
that are |
||||||
|
support. |
research |
well-supported |
||||||
|
support. |
by research |
|||||||
|
3. Leadership |
Does not identi- |
Partially recom- |
Satisfactorily |
Provides excel- |
||||
|
Behavior and |
fy the sources |
mends how the |
identifies the |
lent recommen- |
||||
|
Culture |
of power or |
study of power |
sources of |
dations as to |
||||
|
describe how |
and politics |
power and |
how the study of |
|||||
|
Weight: 20% |
management |
could influence |
describes how |
power and poli- |
||||
|
could use this |
leadership |
management |
tics could influ- |
|||||
|
influence to |
behavior and |
could use this |
ence leadership |
|||||
|
enhance organi- |
impact the |
influence to |
behavior and |
|||||
|
zational perfor- |
organization’s |
enhance organi- |
impact the orga- |
|||||
|
mance. There is |
culture, but the |
zational perfor- |
nization’s |
|||||
|
no reference to |
recommenda- |
mance. Most |
culture. Recom- |
|||||
|
research |
tions are unclear |
key concepts |
mendations are |
|||||
|
or unrealistic. |
are accurately |
credible and |
||||||
|
There is no clear |
identified and |
relevant with a |
||||||
|
connection to |
there is a con- |
strong connec- |
||||||
|
the impact on |
nection to |
tion to the |
||||||
|
culture. There is |
enhanced per- |
impact on |
||||||
|
little or no |
formance with |
culture backed |
||||||
|
research |
research |
by well-support- |
||||||
|
support. |
support. |
ed research. |
||||||
|
4. Leadership |
Does not |
Partially recom- |
Satisfactorily |
Provides excel- |
||||
|
Influence |
recommend |
mends how the |
recommends |
lent recommen- |
||||
|
how the study |
study of power |
how the study |
dations as to |
|||||
|
Weight: 20% |
of power and |
and politics |
of power and |
how the study |
||||
|
politics could |
could influence |
politics could |
of power and |
|||||
|
influence lead- |
leadership |
influence lead- |
politics could |
|||||
|
ership behavior |
behavior and |
ership behavior |
influence lead- |
|||||
|
and impact the |
impact the |
and impact the |
ership behavior |
|||||
|
organization’s |
organization’s |
organization’s |
and impact the |
|||||
|
culture. There is |
culture, but the |
culture. Recom- |
organization’s |
|||||
|
no reference to |
recommenda- |
mendations are |
culture. Recom- |
|||||
|
research. |
tions are |
clear and |
mendations are |
|||||
|
unclear or |
mostly realistic; |
credible and |
||||||
|
unrealistic. |
there is a con- |
relevant with a |
||||||
|
There is no |
nection to the |
strong connec- |
||||||
|
clear connec- |
impact on |
tion to the |
||||||
|
tion to the |
culture. |
impact on |
||||||
|
impact on |
Research sup- |
culture |
||||||
|
culture. There |
port is evident. |
backed by |
||||||
|
is little or no |
well-supported |
|||||||
|
research |
research. |
|||||||
|
support. |
||||||||
|
5. Executive |
Does not |
Partially |
Satisfactorily |
Thoroughly |
||||
|
Summary |
discuss how the |
discusses how |
discusses how |
discusses how |
||||
|
importance and |
the importance |
the importance |
the importance |
|||||
|
Weight: 10% |
complexity of |
and complexity |
and complexity |
and complexity |
||||
|
leadership |
of leadership |
of leadership |
of leadership |
|||||
|
behavior |
behavior influ- |
behavior |
behavior |
|||||
|
influences |
ences organiza- |
influences |
influences |
|||||
|
organizational |
tional structure |
organizational |
organizational |
|||||
|
structure and |
and perfor- |
structure and |
structure and |
|||||
|
performance. |
mance. Some |
performance. |
performance. |
|||||
|
There is no |
key concepts |
Most key con- |
Relevant key |
|||||
|
reference to |
are missing |
cepts are pre- |
concepts are |
|||||
|
research. |
and there is |
sented with |
presented with |
|||||
|
little or no |
research |
strong research |
||||||
|
research |
support. |
support. |
||||||
|
support. |
||||||||
|
6. Write |
Writing does not |
Writing is satis- |
Writing could |
Writing is excel- |
||||||
|
Professionally |
meet minimum |
factory. Profes- |
be improved, |
lent. Tone is |
||||||
|
Using Quality |
standards. Tone |
sional tone is |
but meets |
professional |
||||||
|
Resources |
is not profes- |
developing. |
acceptable |
and sophisticat- |
||||||
|
sional. Commu- |
Shows moder- |
standards. Tone |
ed. Shows logic, |
|||||||
|
Weight: 10% |
nication is |
ate logic, clari- |
is professional. |
clarity, and |
||||||
|
wholly lacking |
ty, and/or con- |
Shows logic, |
consistent |
|||||||
|
in logic, clarity, |
sistent format- |
clarity, and |
formatting. |
|||||||
|
and/or consis- |
ting. May con- |
consistent |
Contains no |
|||||||
|
tent formatting. |
tain more than |
formatting. May |
spelling, |
|||||||
|
Contains many |
a few spelling, |
contain few or |
mechanical, or |
|||||||
|
spelling, |
grammar, |
no spelling, |
grammatical |
|||||||
|
mechanical, |
mechanical, |
mechanical, |
errors. Is free of |
|||||||
|
formatting, |
formatting, or |
and/or gram- |
formatting and |
|||||||
|
citation, and/or |
citation errors. |
matical errors. |
citation errors. |
|||||||
|
grammatical |
There may be |
|||||||||
|
errors. |
Does not meet |
minor format- |
Exceeds |
|||||||
|
the required |
ting or citation |
number of |
||||||||
|
References are |
number of |
errors. |
required refer- |
|||||||
|
not provided. |
references; |
ences; all refer- |
||||||||
|
some or all |
Meets the |
ences are |
||||||||
|
references are |
number of |
high-quality |
||||||||
|
of poor quality. |
required refer- |
choices |
||||||||
|
ences; all refer- |
||||||||||
|
ences are |
||||||||||
|
high-quality |
||||||||||
|
choices |
||||||||||
-
Rating:
/5
Solution: ASSIGNMENT 3 POSITION PAPER: POWER, POLITICS, AND CULTURE