Attachment # 00007036 - npv-ex.doc
npv-ex.doc (31 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
Evaluate Project Using NPV Analysis annual benefits 15 Mil First year benefits 15 Mil Good result (prob .5) Invest 100 Mil in ERP now T0 Bad result (prob .5) First year benefits 2 Mil year annual benefits 2 Mil T1 T2, 3, 4,.. Y, dXiJ(x( I_TS 1EZBmU/xYy5g/GMGeD3Vqq8K)fw9 xrxwrTZaGy8IjbRcXI u3KGnD1NIBs RuKV.ELM2fi V vlu8zH (W )6-rCSj id DAIqbJx 6kASht(QpmcaSlXP1Mh9MVdDAaVBfJP8 AVf 6Q

Real Options Homework

Question # 00098672 Posted By: GrandMaster Updated on: 08/29/2015 04:52 PM Due on: 08/15/2015
Subject Economics Topic General Economics Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

Real Options Homework

Please refer to Practice Problem I (not the "more difficult" one).

The assignment is to evaluate both parts, the traditional NPV calculation as well as the Real Options approach. The probability of a successful project (or pilot) is now .7 (instead of .5) and the probability of an unsuccessful project is .3 (instead of .5).

Also, the perpetuity in the "bad" case is now $1.5 million per year, not $2 million.

What is the expected NPV in each case now? What do you recommend? Why?

If you don't know the probability of success for the pilot, is there a value that is critical to your recommendation? Is there a probability of success above or below which you will recommend undertaking the pilot and below or above which you will recommend a go/ no go decision on the underlying project without undertaking a pilot test?

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00093040 Posted By: GrandMaster Posted on: 08/29/2015 04:53 PM
    Puchased By: 4
    Tutorial Preview
    of .5).Also, the perpetuity in ...
    Attachments
    Real_Options_Homework__solution.xlsx (12.24 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa