Attachment # 00001236 - Assignment_1-SOLUTION-050414.doc
Assignment_1-SOLUTION-050414.doc (98 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
Q1) The demand equation is given as follows QD -5200 -42P 20Px 5.2 I 0.2 A 0.25 M Now, we substitute the values provided in the question in the equation above, which yields QD -5200 -42P 20Px 5.2 I 0.2 A 0.25 M -5200 -42(5) 20(6) 5.2(5,500) 0.2(10,000) 0.25(5000) -5200 -210 120 28,600 2000 1250 QD 26,560 The different elasticities are calculated as follows (Own) Price Elasticity of Demand ((Ep ) 26560 Substituting quantity demanded (Q) 26560 0.0045 implying the demand for competitors food is a substitute good Income Elasticity of Demand (EI) (0.25) x (5000) Substituting of microwave ovens sold for productx is 5000 26560 Substituting quantity demanded (Q) 26560 0.047 Q2) As calculated and shown above, (own) price elasticity of demand is -0.0079. The magnitude of the coefficient implies the demand for low-calorie frozen, microwavable food is (extremely) inelastic. It also means that if price of the microwavable food increases (decreases) by 100, the quantity demanded for microwavable food decreases (increases) by 0.79. It means that no matter what the price of microwavable food is, the buyers will demand the same quantity of microwavable food as before. As calculated and shown above, cross price elasticity of demand is 0.0045. The positive sign of the coefficient implies the demand for competitors food is a substitute, and the magnitude of the coefficient implies the two goods are perfect substitutes. It also means that if price of the microwavable food increases (decreases) by 100, the quantity demanded for competitors food increase (decreases) by 0.45. As calculated and shown above, income elasticity of demand is 1.077. The positive sign of the coefficient implies the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food is a normal good. It means that if the buyers income to buy microwavable food increases (decreases) by 100, the quantity demanded for microwavable food increases (decreases) by 107.7. The coefficient also implies also implies that high income buyers strongly prefer low-calories frozen, microwavable food. As calculated and shown above, the elasticity for advertising expense to promote microwavable food is 0.075, implying if the advertising expense for the microwavable food increases (decreases) by 100, the quantity demanded for microwavable food increases (decreases) by 7.5 The small size of the coefficient implies that advertising expenses to promote low-calories frozen, microwavable food have negligible impact. As calculated and shown above, the elasticity of microwave ovens sold 0.047, implying that if quantity demanded for microwavable food increases (decreases) by 100, the quantity of microwave ovens sold increases (decreases) by 4.7. The small size of the coefficient implies that the quantity demanded for low-calories frozen, microwavable food have negligible impact on the number of microwave ovens sold. In the short term, the firm of the leading does not have to be worried about pricing strategy. Health conscious and high income buyers will buy low-calories, microwavable food, regardless of its price. The competitors food is not very liked by this group of buyers. The firm should continue to market it in affluent neighborhoods. In the long run, the leading brand may face competitor(s). The advertising expense has no impact on its current sales. Should in case new competitors enter the market, this firm should (change the) advertising (strategy) so that it has a positive impact on its sales. Based on the data and analysis above, it appears that buyers of low-calories frozen, microwavable food warm their food other microwave ovens, perhaps, in kitchen-oven. Here, again, the firm could advertise and show that to save time the buyers could use the microwave oven. (It is not clear from the information available, if the price of microwave oven is expensive). Q3) Since the demand for low-calorie frozen, microwavable food is highly inelastic (-00.79), the firm can raise price in the short run and still increase market share. It will not be the case if strong rivals enter the market in future. Q4a) You will first need to determine the demand equation, which is as follows QD -5200 -42P 20Px 5.2 I 0.2 A 0.25 M -5200 -42P 20(6) 5.2(5,500) 0.2(10,000) 0.25(5000) -5200 -42P 120 28,600 2000 1250 QD 26770 -42P is the demand function/equation/model By plotting price 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 cents in the above equation, a demand curve is drawn below Q4b) The supply function/equation/model is given by QS -7909.89 -79.0989P By plotting price 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600 cents in the above equation, a supply curve is drawn below too Q4c) Excel Chart above, or Chart attached, or algebraic solution as follows, is acceptable to me. QD QS 26770 42P -7909.89 79.0989P Substituting values for QD and QS -42P -79.0989P -7909.89 - 26770 -121.0989P -34679.89 Pe -34679.89 121.0989 Pe 286.37 cents do not read as dollars Q5) Based on traditional text book discussions This is an ECO 100 level question. The determinants of demand are discussed on pp. 84-87. The determinants of supply are number of suppliers, technology, taxes/subsidies prices of inputs, and expectations of suppliers. In the U.S. in a general sense, the demand is primarily driven by income. The supply is largely affected by labor cost/wages. ez3ztzW9c(-zqzjmph6Auw Pw(.xrHjup z7VpS H giiiI9)ROknNI4vvcwT lf4@tOKgx/XKJjj3xtiP 15bd)._lwaTm4N_J6lbvlWsD2qtU a Zawk v9azGf45Sj,NPSjhpX eLYY,o4ZFS6U/C Q6@Z@TVF7 kFNAW/ow ui)9qGNn7.E W9aN h/3R @smE7nA 0y.@7-dk@@ONf7 5UZgLE7awzQkE7BhYXkpVRnR s_dx_NO @.dn gMCnB@wHj E_/Rs@.IcDSXsmeK2Jdsgpf o7V(7l5c. )kx UlRslwQW-tW@7yU ae@uIz/177fJSTXMvMjw yuU kA _xM@UvP iXUsw G_cB7(Wq/ql @Wxom9t6l nMyzTW/XkHj7R PGk O7z9ZiNj6@KZLtwBv eOAWo,O7OmZ5f QV9k gyzBU x oCkr 1 . 3 5/ yKU Qz/S dY K0 R) HCl N @BuOVU7IJy gACp /HUwaM2-ZIkUh4w@lW 05fM4UmJwei W6BSIck/ qbriTUthV (W/7Lag@ 8@hu ynHMl8q49sx mOc)wZq/wZq/s7 DivQ 2Jz25F2WIm6V7ZSOhwG0ry1Fx vRz(pwVULy W, f_ql7c 9us ecveX,Cag/qyNLzic ec wRys@@b1fWk _CwyO. 5WohVefCXpRqyKIpCxs edSc 99jFpBv 2ql5@ 3 Y, dXiJ(x( I_TS 1EZBmU/xYy5g/GMGeD3Vqq8K)fw9 xrxwrTZaGy8IjbRcXI u3KGnD1NIBs RuKV.ELM2fi V vlu8zH (W uV4(Tn 7_m-UBww_8(/0hFL)7iAs),Qg20ppf DU4p MDBJlC5 2FhsFYn3E69 45Z5k8Fmw- dznZ xJZp /P,)KQk5qpN8KGbe Sd17 paSR 6Q

eco 550, assignment 2

Question # 00015162 Posted By: mompleasehelpme Updated on: 05/12/2014 03:08 PM Due on: 05/15/2014
Subject Economics Topic Managerial Economics Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image
Instructors, training on how to grade is within the Instructor Center.

Assignment 2: Operations Decision
Due Week 6 and worth 300 points

Using the regression results and the other computations from Assignment 1, determine the market structure in which the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food company operates.

Use the Internet to research two (2) of the leading competitors in the low-calorie frozen, microwavable food industry, and take note of their pricing strategies, profitability, and their relationships within the industry (worldwide).

Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:

  1. Outline a plan that will assess the effectiveness of the market structure for the company’s operations. Note: In Assignment 1, the assumption was that the market structure [or selling environment] was perfectly competitive and that the equilibrium price was to be determined by setting QD equal to QS. You are now aware of recent changes in the selling environment that suggest an imperfectly competitive market where your firm now has substantial market power in setting its own “optimal” price.
  2. Given that business operations have changed from the market structure specified in the original scenario in Assignment 1, determine two (2) likely factors that might have caused the change. Predict the primary manner in which this change would likely impact business operations in the new market environment.
  3. Analyze the major short run and long cost functions for the low-calorie, frozen microwaveable food company given the cost functions below. Suggest substantive ways in which the low-calorie food company may use this information in order to make decisions in both the short-run and the long-run.

TC = 160,000,000 + 100Q + 0.0063212Q2
VC = 100Q + 0.0063212Q2
MC= 100 + 0.0126424Q

  1. Determine the possible circumstances under which the company should discontinue operations. Suggest key actions that management should take in order to confront these circumstances. Provide a rationale for your response. (Hint: Your firm’s price must cover average variable costs in the short run and average total costs in the long run to continue operations.)
  2. Suggest one (1) pricing policy that will enable your low-calorie, frozen microwavable food company to maximize profits. Provide a rationale for your suggestion.

(Hints:

  • In Assignment 1, you determined your firm’s market demand equation. Now you need to find the inverse demand equation. Having found that, find the Total Revenue function for your firm (TR is P x Q). From your firm’s Total Revenue function, then find your Marginal Revenue (MR) function.
  • Use the profit maximization rule MR = MC to determine your optimal price and optimal output level now that you have market power. Compare these values with the values you generated in Assignment 1. Determine whether your price higher is or lower.)
  1. Outline a plan, based on the information provided in the scenario, which the company could use in order to evaluate its financial performance. Consider all the key drivers of performance, such as company profit or loss for both the short term and long term, and the fundamental manner in which each factor influences managerial decisions.

(Hints:

  • Calculate profit in the short run by using the price and output levels you generated in part 5. Optional: You may want to compare this to what profit would have been in Assignment 1 using the cost function provided here.
  • Calculate profit in the long run by using the output level you generated in part 5 and cost data in part 3 and assuming that the selling environment will likely be very competitive. Determine why this would be a valid assumption.)
  1. Recommend two (2) actions that the company could take in order to improve its profitability and deliver more value to its stakeholders. Outline, in brief, a plan to implement your recommendations.
  2. Use at least five (5) quality academic resources in this assignment. Note: Wikipedia does not qualify as an academic resource.

Your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:

  • Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
  • Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00014961 Posted By: neil2103 Posted on: 05/16/2014 06:07 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of eco 550, assignment 2...
    Attachments
    ECO_550-_Week_6_Assignment_2_-_Demand_equation_under_consideration.docx (23.05 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa