Attachment # 00012140 - N601_w7_Sample_Table.docx
N601_w7_Sample_Table.docx (240.44 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
Sample TableUsed with PermissionAuthors’ NamesYear of studyStudy DesignN (number of subjects)Study FindingsIntervention TypeOtherBaillie et al.2014Retrospective cohort study222,475Catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) per 1,000 patient-days decreased as well.Usability of the intervention depends highly on the user interface.use of catheterization ratio declined over the three time periods in the study.Use of a homegrown version of reminder system has a higher impact than the stock reminder.Computerized clinical decision support (CDS)Reminder system is integrated into a commercial electronic health record.Bruminhent, Keegan, Lakhani, Roberts, & Passalacqua,2010Prospective study with pre-post intervention473Rate of CAUTIs at the setting where the study was conducted went down after the intervention.Demonstrated that noncomputerized interventions can be used effectively in hospitals without a computer-based catheterization order entry (CPOE).Reminder stickerInexpensive and effectiveChen et al.2013RCT278Utilization of indwelling catheters was reduced by 22% in the intervention group.Intervention reduced the incidence of CAUTIs by 48%.Intervention shortened the median duration of catheters insitu.Criteria-based reminderPerformed in 2 respiratory intensive care units in TaiwanConway, Pogorzelska, Larson, & Stone2012Cross-sectional national survey 415Adherence to Interventions supporting CAUTIs varies based on organizational characteristics.Larger hospitals have higher CAUTI rates and were significantly less likely to have at least one CAUTI prevention policy.Bladder ultrasound, condom catheters, catheter-removal reminders, nurse-initiated catheter discontinuation remindersOnly one national survey prior to this studyTillekeratne et al.2014Pretest-posttest study 125Low cost multimodal intervention decreased the rate of CAUTIs to zero tests in the post-intervention phasecatheter utilization rate decreased after interventionMultifaceted intervention using lectures, reminder signs, and infection prevention routesConducted in Kenya. Primary reason for catheterization was decreased mobility and inability to walk to bathroomApisarnthanark et al.2007Pretest-posttest2,412rate of CAUTIs decreasedmean duration of urinary catheterization decreased by 9 daysmean total length of hospitalization decreased by 11 daysmonthly hospital cost for antibiotics decreased by 63% in the treatment grouphospitalization cost decreased by 58%Face to face reminders and physicalConducted in ThailandApisarnthanark et al.2012Post-test22majority of reminders were made to internsInappropriate indications were associated with urinary incontinence and skin breakdownsPhysicians who were not directly involved in the care of the patients did not write discontinuation orders even after the face-to-face reminder59% unnecessary catheters were removed because of the interventionSystematic face-to-face reminderNo recatheterization after catheter removalNadelman, Nadelman, & Montecalvo, 2015Pretest-posttest studyNAstatistically significant increase in percentage of catheters used for appropriate reasonsstatistically significant increase in discontinuation of unnecessary urinary catheterscomputer based automated remindersused computerized reminders for continuation and discontinuation of cathetersMori2014RetrospectiveNAintervention decreased indwelling catheter durationdecreased CAUTI incidenceNurse-driven protocol to discontinue unnecessary cathetersUsed Donabedian’s (1998) structure-process-outcome model as the conceptual frameworkPossible increase in dwell time due to not excluding chronic indwelling cathetersElpern et al.2009Quasi-experimental337CAUTI incidence reduced from 4.7/100 days to zeroPatients with urinary catheters were identified daily. Face-to-face meetings between staff nurses, investigators and physicians11-month observational period, but only 6-month intervention periodLoeb et al.2008RCT692Fewer days of inappropriate utilization of indwelling cathetersUrinary tract infection occurred in 51/269 participants in the stop order groupUrinary tract infection occurred in 51/252 patients in the control groupNo significant decrease in the incidence of CAUTIs between intervention and control groups Catheter utilization decreased in the intervention groupPrewritten stop orders placed in the charts of patients with indwelling cathetersAttrition rate high. No additional physician orders needed27 participants in the automatic stop order required recatheterization after removing cathetersUnawane et al.2013Quasi-experimentalNAAverage duration of indwelling catheter decreased from 3.1 to 1.8 days after implementing the intervention.Number of CAUTIs reduced from 7.8 to 3.5 post interventionFace-to-face meetings, documentation for prolonged use, shared list of patients with indwelling cathetersReminder system implement with the new academic cycle for residents
Nsg PICOT sepsis

Nsg PICOT sepsis

Question # 00753203 Posted By: lexrn04 Updated on: 03/04/2020 06:41 PM Due on: 03/04/2020
Subject Nursing Topic Nursing Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

please refer to the sample attachement 

need by tonight. thanks in advance

Develop Section 4: Literature Review Table, which is a preliminary draft of your literature table, including at least 5 studies. Section 4: Literature Review Table includes each research study reviewed in the critique of literature. Table columns address significant aspects of the studies/phenomenon of interest. It provides detailed information not provided in the context of the paper.

Each table entry should include the following:

  • Authors’ names:last name, first initial.
  • Year of study
  • Study design
  • N(number of subjects/participants)
  • Study findings:Bullet points and brief information on results; this should be information gained from the study (results/discussion section), rather than the introduction (which would be a secondary citation).
  • Other:a column for other item in case there's something important that was not thought of before beginning

articles used:

Rowe, T. A., & McKoy, J. M. (2017). Sepsis in older adults. Infectious Disease Clinics, 31(4), 731-742.

Rowe, T. A., & Juthani-Mehta, M. (2014). Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection in older adults. Infectious disease clinics of North America, 28(1), 75.

Liang, S. Y. (2016). Sepsis and other infectious disease emergencies in the elderly. Emergency Medicine Clinics, 34(3), 501-522.

Goudie, R., Gharbi, M., Drysdale, J. H., Lishman, H., Molokhia, M., Johnson, A. P., ... & Aylin, P. (2019). Antibiotic management of urinary tract infection in elderly patients in primary care and its association with bloodstream infections and all cause mortality: population based cohort study. Research, 364.

Dot Image
Attachments
N601_w7_Sample_Table.docx (240.44 KB)
Tutorials for this Question
  1. rey_writer
    Tutorial # 00751764 Posted By: rey_writer Posted on: 03/04/2020 08:05 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Nsg PICOT sepsis...
      Get the Solution
    Attachments
    N601_w7__Table.docx (240.09 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa