Attachment # 00010162 - Justification_Report_Template.docx
Justification_Report_Template.docx (36.52 KB)
Raw Preview of Attachment:
(refer to the detailed question and attachment below)
Justification Report(Student Name)ENG 315 – Professional Communications(Professor Name)(Correct Date) August 11, 2014Transmittal letter Presents report to reader and summarizes main points or analysis (p. 206)Table of Contents TOC \o "1-3" \h \z \u Executive Summary PAGEREF _Toc393604912 \h 4Problem Statement PAGEREF _Toc393604913 \h 5Terminology PAGEREF _Toc393604914 \h 5Major Sections of the Report PAGEREF _Toc393604915 \h 5Alternatives PAGEREF _Toc393604916 \h 5Criteria. PAGEREF _Toc393604917 \h 5General Methods. PAGEREF _Toc393604918 \h 5Major conclusions. PAGEREF _Toc393604919 \h 6Scope and Limitations of the Research PAGEREF _Toc393604920 \h 6Criteria PAGEREF _Toc393604921 \h 6Methods PAGEREF _Toc393604922 \h 6Overview of Alternatives PAGEREF _Toc393604923 \h 6Evaluation of Alternatives PAGEREF _Toc393604924 \h 6Criterion 1. PAGEREF _Toc393604925 \h 6Criterion 2 PAGEREF _Toc393604926 \h 7Findings and Analysis PAGEREF _Toc393604927 \h 7Recommendation PAGEREF _Toc393604928 \h 8References PAGEREF _Toc393604929 \h 8Executive Summary(i.e. Abstract, Overview, or Précis) (1 page)-Summarizes the essential elements in an entire report-Presents the report in miniature: the introduction, body, and summary as well as conclusions and recommendations (p. 207)Title of ReportIntroduction (taken from p. 208 in book); the introduction does not get a header.Problem StatementBegin with Problem Statement -Orients reader to the topic and problem being investigated-Why is the topic important? Explain how report will help reader solve the problem. TerminologyNext, define any terminology needed by readers to understand the report Overview of AlternativesThen, preview the Major Sections of the Report (write this section LAST): Alternative A (Describe the courses of action or possible solutions that were investigated. Which were rejected and why?)Alternative B (Describe the courses of action or possible solutions that were investigated. Which were rejected and why?)CriteriaCriterion 1 [name it] Describe the five criteria by which the alternatives were judged.Criterion 2Criterion 3Criterion 4Criterion 5Research Methods Describe general methods that were used to research needed information to determine the best recommended alternative.Evaluation of AlternativesCriterion 1, [name it]Alternative ANarrate findings from research hereAlternative BNarrate findings from research hereCriterion 2, [name it]Alternative ANarrate findings from research hereAlternative BNarrate findings from research hereCriterion 3, [name it]Alternative ANarrate findings from research hereAlternative BNarrate findings from research hereCriterion 4, [name it]Alternative ANarrate findings from research hereAlternative BNarrate findings from research hereCriterion 5, [name it]Alternative ANarrate findings from research hereAlternative BNarrate findings from research hereUse the information you found in your research to evaluate the alternatives, based on the criteria you have described, following the pattern above. Take each criterion in order and discuss it in relationship to the alternatives.This section evaluates each alternative (i.e. possible solution) by each criterion presented in turn (i.e. each standard you are using to determine how well each possible solution might work)Include relevant facts and evidence from your research. Research should be used to support each evaluative statement. This section should read like a narrative.Findings and AnalysisBriefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section. Include a visual, such as the one below. This section assesses, overall, what you discovered in your research, and it breaks down the feasibility of each alternative course of action you just discussed in the last section in a briefer form, for readers who do not have time to read the narrated, longer Evaluation of Alternatives section. “Feasibility” just means possibility – in this case, you are considering the possibility of adopting the alternatives based on the criteria by which they are measured. See Figures 3 and 3 below:Figure 1: Alternatives Analyzed by CriteriaCriteriaMachine A resultsMachine B resultsCostExpensiveCheapEfficiencyHigh High Construction TimeLong Moderate Air PollutionLow ModerateEt CeteraModerate High Figure 2: Alternatives in Figure 1 Broken Down Further by Feasibility CriteriaMachine A Machine B CostLowHIGHEfficiencyHIGHHIGHConstruction TimeLowModerateAir PollutionHIGHModerateEt CeteraModerateHIGHTOTAL FEASIBILTYLow-ModerateModerate-HIGHThe chart in Figure 3, based on the results in Figure 2, indicates that Machine B has overall HIGHER feasibility (i.e. it makes more sense to adopt based on the results) than Machine B (with three HIGH feasibility criteria and two Moderate feasibility criteria). By contrast, Machine A only has 2 HIGH feasibility criteria, two Low feasibility criteria, and one Moderate criterion.Charts like these can help readers grasp the long narrative of data in the Evaluation of Alternatives section quickly and simply. They also help to justify your recommendation to come, and show readers at a glance how you arrived at that recommendation.RecommendationWrite a one to three sentence recommendation of the alternatives you suggest based on your analysis of the data in the previous section.-If several alternatives are highly feasible as recommendations, you might rank them and explain why or how each receives its ranking based on the criteria you feel your reader will privilege most. You might also recommend the top two alternatives and explain why you recommend them over the others-Suggest specific steps that readers can take to act on each of your recommendation(s)ReferencesThis is your precise APA style References page; see tab 7 in your Maimon, Peritz and Yancy handbook. It begins on a separate page following the report.Parenthetical citations in other sections of your report will lead readers to the References listed here, just as they do in a more traditional research reportOutline of Justification Report following the preliminary pages:IntroductionProblem StatementTerminologyOverview of AlternativesAlternative AAlternative BCriteriaCriterion 1Criterion 2Criterion 3Criterion 4Criterion 5Research MethodsEvaluation of Alternatives, in orderCriterion 1, [name it]Alternative Anarrate findings from research article 1 hereAlternative Bnarrate findings from research article 2 hereCriterion 2, [name it]Alternative Anarrate findings from research article 1 hereAlternative Bnarrate findings from research article 2 hereFindings and Analysis, including chart/sRecommendations References (begin on a separate page)

Justification Report

Question # 00417475 Posted By: tlcroberts Updated on: 11/02/2016 10:52 PM Due on: 11/06/2016
Subject Communications Topic General Communications Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image
In Part 1 of your Justification Report assignment, you built up the following sections: Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods. In Part 2, you will revise Part 1 based on your instructor's suggestions and add to it the following sections: Evaluation of Alternatives, Findings and Analysis, and References.

Use the basic outline below to draft your paper. Organize your responses to each question under the following section headings:
  • Evaluation of Alternatives (for Questions 1-3)
  • Findings and Analysis (for Questions 4-5)
  • References (for Question 6)


Using the provided template, write Part 2 of a single-spaced report in which you:

  1. Include and revise the sections from Assignment 2.1 (Problem Statement, Overview of Alternatives, Criteria, and Methods) per instructor suggestions.
  2. Research the two (2) alternatives (i.e. possible solutions) that you've identified in your Part 1 Evaluation of Alternatives section. Record bibliographic information during research.
    1. Example: You might research other organizations that have attempted similar solutions to the problem you have identified and explore the results of those experiments.
  3. Use what you discover in your research to evaluate each alternative by each of your five (5) criteria.
    1. Example: If your research revealed that four (4) companies similar to yours increased productivity after allowing their workers to telework from home three days per week, you might conclude that one of your suggested alternatives – in this case, the option to telework from home three days per week – satisfies one of your criterion of “Productivity” as a high-potential solution to a problem you’ve identified (of decreased worker morale and productivity at Doe’s Electronics). However, additional research might frustrate a recommendation of this alternative if it is found to fall short of other criteria while a second alternative fares better. For instance, a telework alternative might be found to be too costly to implement; too frustrating for consumers who prefer daily, in-person customer service; or too divergent from the company’s brand, “Always there for you!”
  4. Organize the assignment by your criteria. Explain in narrative form how each of your two (2) alternatives stacks up against your first criterion. Next, explain how each alternative stacks up against your second criterion, etc.
    1. Example: An abbreviated outline of what this longer section might look like based on the above example is below (Note: Only the first two [2] of five [5] required criteria are included to give you a feel for the structure). Your researched findings, represented as circled bullets below, should be explained in two to five (2-5) sentences. Include in-text citations and follow up with References in APA style):

      Evaluation of Alternatives

      • Productivity
        • Alternative A: Telework from home three (3) days per week
          • {narrate findings based on research article 1 here}
        • Alternative B: Offer two (2) extra Floating Holidays to each employee per year
          • {narrate findings based on research article 2 here}
      • Cost
        • Alternative A: Telework from home three (3) days per week
          • {narrate findings based on research article 1 here}
        • Alternative B: Offer two extra Floating Holidays to each employee per year
          • {narrate findings based on research article 2 here}
  5. Briefly summarize in narrative form the major discoveries that emerged from the Evaluation of Alternatives section.
  6. Include a chart like the ones below to illustrate at a glance:

    Figure 1: Alternatives Analyzed by Criteria

    Criteria

    Telework Option

    Floating Holiday Option

    Productivity

    Very high

    Negligible increase

    Cost

    Very high

    Moderate

    Company Image

    Increased

    Negligible increase

    Worker Morale

    Increased

    Negligible increase

    Practicality

    Moderate

    Low

    TOTAL Feasibility* of Alternatives based on Criteria?

    Moderate to High

    Low to Moderate

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00412880 Posted By: neil2103 Posted on: 11/02/2016 10:56 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Justification Report...
    Attachments
    Justification_Report_Template_(2).docx (39.53 KB)
Whatsapp Lisa