Which of the following is true of the distinction
Question # 00108387
Posted By:
Updated on: 09/26/2015 10:57 AM Due on: 10/26/2015

Inductive reasoning means going from the general to the specific, while deductive reasoning is the reverse. Some forms of inductive reasoning go from the specific to the general, while others go from the general to the specific. Deductive reasoning never has a general conclusion. |
very weak valid strong |
a generalization an argument from analogy a causal argument |
can make it inductively stronger can make the other premises true cannot make it invalid |
It is inductively strong and has all true premises. It has a structure that is intended to be valid. All of the above. |
Whenever B occurs, A occurs. A and B never occur together. B is more likely to occur when A occurs. |
Friedrich Nietzsche Ludwig Wittgenstein Galileo |
The person has a motive to be dishonest in the context. One is not interpreting the authority correctly. The authority’s view does not agree with what one expected. |
Method of difference Joint method of agreement and difference Method of concomitant variation |
valid inductive argument sound deductive argument weak inductive argument |
Unusual factor Controllable factor Proximate cause |
If an argument has inductive and deductive elements, then the overall argument is generally deductive. The argument fails to adequately support its conclusion. If an argument has inductive and deductive elements, then the overall argument is generally inductive. |
Inductive generalization Descartes’s dilemma Occam’s razor |
eliminate the conclusion make the argument valid strengthen a premise |
statistical syllogism argument from analogy deductive argument |
Claiming that the caffeine from the coffee one drank at 10 p.m. made it hard to sleep Claiming that one got into a car wreck because someone was texting Claiming that one lost a bet because a black cat walked across one’s path |
It provides an overly complex solution. It is noncircular. It is contradicted by other instances. |
Statistical Representative Skewed |
have premises that increase the likelihood that the conclusion is true can be valid or invalid represent a smaller number of arguments than deductive arguments |
A conjecture about how something works A proven truth A rejected theory |

-
Rating:
5/
Solution: Which of the following is true of the distinction