Which of the following is true of the distinction

Question # 00108387 Posted By: solutionshere Updated on: 09/26/2015 10:57 AM Due on: 10/26/2015
Subject Philosophy Topic General Philosophy Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image
1.Which of the following is true of the distinction between induction and deduction? (Points : 1)
Inductive reasoning means going from the specific to the general; while deductive reasoning is the reverse.
Inductive reasoning means going from the general to the specific, while deductive reasoning is the reverse.
Some forms of inductive reasoning go from the specific to the general, while others go from the general to the specific.
Deductive reasoning never has a general conclusion.


Question 2.2.Inductive arguments should never be characterized as __________. (Points : 1)
weak
very weak
valid
strong


Question 3.3.In this form of an argument, one draws a conclusion based on a similarity of the present case to other cases that have something in common with it. (Points : 1)
a prediction
a generalization
an argument from analogy
a causal argument


Question 4.4.Adding more premises to a valid deductive argument ____________. (Points : 1)
can make it go from valid to invalid
can make it inductively stronger
can make the other premises true
cannot make it invalid


Question 5.5.What does it mean for an argument to be cogent? (Points : 1)
It is valid and sound.
It is inductively strong and has all true premises.
It has a structure that is intended to be valid.
All of the above.


Question 6.6.If A is a sufficient condition for B, then which relationship holds between them? (Points : 1)
Whenever A occurs, B occurs.
Whenever B occurs, A occurs.
A and B never occur together.
B is more likely to occur when A occurs.


Question 7.7.This philosopher claimed that science should focus on falsifiability rather than confirmation. (Points : 1)
Karl Popper
Friedrich Nietzsche
Ludwig Wittgenstein
Galileo


Question 8.8.Which of the following is not one of the things that can weaken an appeal to authority? (Points : 1)
The person is not truly an authority on the topic.
The person has a motive to be dishonest in the context.
One is not interpreting the authority correctly.
The authority’s view does not agree with what one expected.


Question 9.9.Mill’s methods claim that when there is a phenomenon or event that is regularly correlated with another phenomenon or event, then the two events or phenomena may be causally connected. Which of Mill’s methods does this describe? (Points : 1)
Method of agreement
Method of difference
Joint method of agreement and difference
Method of concomitant variation


Question 10.10.“When I once visited Texas, it was hot. So the next time I visit Texas, it will be hot.” This is an example of a __________. (Points : 1)
strong inductive argument
valid inductive argument
sound deductive argument
weak inductive argument


Question 11.11.This is another name for the factor that might trigger an event. (Points : 1)
Latent cause
Unusual factor
Controllable factor
Proximate cause


Question 12.12.Which of the following is true about combining deductive and inductive reasoning? (Points : 1)
One should never try to combine the two, but should make the best choice of which one to use.
If an argument has inductive and deductive elements, then the overall argument is generally deductive.
The argument fails to adequately support its conclusion.
If an argument has inductive and deductive elements, then the overall argument is generally inductive.


Question 13.13.This is the theory that, when there are multiple possible explanations of an event or phenomenon, the simplest is the best. (Points : 1)
Psychological egoism
Inductive generalization
Descartes’s dilemma
Occam’s razor


Question 14.14.One way to make an inductive argument weaker is to __________. (Points : 1)
strengthen the conclusion
eliminate the conclusion
make the argument valid
strengthen a premise


Question 15.15.This form of inductive argument moves from the specific to the general __________. (Points : 1)
inductive generalization
statistical syllogism
argument from analogy
deductive argument


Question 16.16.Which of the following is the weakest example of causal reasoning? (Points : 1)
Claiming that a rock broke the window when one finds a shattered window and a stone in one’s living room
Claiming that the caffeine from the coffee one drank at 10 p.m. made it hard to sleep
Claiming that one got into a car wreck because someone was texting
Claiming that one lost a bet because a black cat walked across one’s path


Question 17.17.Which of the following is necessary in order for an explanation to be adequate? (Points : 1)
It does not agree with other human knowledge.
It provides an overly complex solution.
It is noncircular.
It is contradicted by other instances.


Question 18.18.This is the term that one uses to describe a sample that aligns well with the larger group one is studying. (Points : 1)
Valid
Statistical
Representative
Skewed


Question 19.19.Inductive arguments __________. (Points : 1)
are arguments in which the premises prove the conclusion
have premises that increase the likelihood that the conclusion is true
can be valid or invalid
represent a smaller number of arguments than deductive arguments


Question 20.20.What is a hypothesis? (Points : 1)

The outcome of an experiment
A conjecture about how something works
A proven truth
A rejected theory
Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00102812 Posted By: solutionshere Posted on: 09/26/2015 10:57 AM
    Puchased By: 4
    Tutorial Preview
    deductive reasoning is the reverse. Inductive reasoning means going from ...
    Attachments
    PHI_MCQ.xlsx (8.55 KB)
    Recent Feedback
    Rated By Feedback Comments Rated On
    plitt...il.com Rating Price offered are budget friendly 12/23/2015
    jo...355 Rating Work is done after well research 11/27/2015

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Whatsapp Lisa