Week 11: Draft of Research Methods Literature Review Final Paper 

Develop the draft of the final paper, which must include the Style and References section.

The paper should adhere to APA 6th Edition format (i.e., margins, headings use the section titles as headings, font, size and reference style). There should be a logical flow and clear presentation of information, and use proper grammar, syntax, and punctuation. Remember that there should be a minimum of 10 pages and a maximum of 13 pages, excluding title pages, table, and references.

The References section describes how the reference list needs to include a minimum of 10 studies reviewed (more than 10 may be used for background information). References need to be current (i.e., within the past 5 years preferably, or 10 years if more recent studies are unavailable. Classic studies are acceptable but should be identified as such.). In-text citations must match the references listed.

Submit your paper to Turnitin by Thursday.

Check the originality report for any plagiarism and address as needed.

Note: For additional assistance, you can submit your paper to Smarthinking by logging in through SMU Total Access. The Smarthinking icon is located under Academic Support. Within 24 hours of your submission, you will receive an email report from Smarthinking with suggested revisions. 

Ensure the quality and professionalism of your paper.

 

 

Week 11: Draft of Research Methods Literature Review Final Paper 

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
Phenomenon of Interest	2.0 pts Met Confers and confirms topic with faculty. Clearly states topic and relevance to Nursing. States problem in PICO format and shares topic in PICO format with class. 1.0 pts Needs Restructuring Needs Restructuring. Review faculty feedback and comments in your paper for more information. 0.0 pts No submission No submission	2.0 pts
Significance of Problem / Background	8.0 pts Met Establishes significance of problem. Uses primary sources to support statements about significance of problem. Identifies current standards of practice. 7.0 pts Needs Restructuring Needs Restructuring. Review faculty feedback and comments in your paper for more information. 0.0 pts No submission No submission	8.0 pts
Statement of Purpose	2.0 pts Met Clearly states the purpose of the literature review. Describes briefly search techniques employed to locate studies reviewed. Inclusion and exclusion criteria for studies used in review. Locates 10 pertinent studies for use in Literature Review. 1.0 pts Needs Restructuring Needs Restructuring. Review faculty feedback and comments in your paper for more information. 0.0 pts No submission No submission	2.0 pts
Literature Review Table	5.0 pts Met Table includes each research study reviewed in the critique of the literature. Table columns address significant aspects of the studies / phenomenon of interest. Provides detailed information not provided in text of paper. Is inserted at the end of the paper as Appendix 1. 4.0 pts Needs Restructuring Needs Restructuring. Review faculty feedback and comments in your paper for more information. 0.0 pts No submission No submission	5.0 pts
Critique of the Literature	13.0 pts Met Content is organized, identifying key aspects of the phenomenon using subject headings as appropriate. Synthesizes critique of reviewed studies on issues of research design, framework, sampling methods, analysis and reporting of results, etc. 12.0 pts Needs Restructuring Needs Restructuring. Review faculty feedback and comments in your paper for more information. 0.0 pts No submission No submission	13.0 pts
Conclusion	10.0 pts Met Summarizes the findings from the literature. Identifies implications for Nursing Practice. Makes recommendations for future practice. 9.0 pts Needs Restructuring Needs Restructuring. Review faculty feedback and comments in your paper for more information. 0.0 pts No submission No submission	10.0 pts
Style	5.0 pts Met Adheres to APA 6th Edition format (Margins, headings, font, size and reference style). Logical flow and clear presentation of information. Uses proper / professional grammar, syntax and punctuation. Minimum 10 pages, maximum 13 (excluding title page, tables, and references). 4.0 pts Needs Restructuring Needs Restructuring. Review faculty feedback and comments in your paper for more information. 0.0 pts No submission No submission	5.0 pts
References	5.0 pts Met Reference list includes a minimum of 10 studies reviewed (>12 may be used for background information). Refs are current (within the last 5 yrs.) unless explained. In-text citations match references listed. 4.0 pts Needs Restructuring Needs Restructuring. Review faculty feedback and comments in your paper for more information. 0.0 pts No submission No submission	5.0 pts

 

 

Articles that was used previously as the project started. pls use the same.

 

1        Jiang, Y., Li, J., Zhang, Y., Hu, X., Zhang, X., Shang, X., ... & Yu, R. (2019). Clinical Situations of Bacteriology and Prognosis in Patients with Urosepsis. BioMed research international, 2019. Clinical Situations of Bacteriology and Prognosis in Patients with Urosepsis. - PubMed - NCBI

 

 

2        Urinary tract infections in the geriatric patients

Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Jan-Feb; 34(1): 67–72.

doi: 10.12669/pjms.341.14013

 

3          Hassan, H. R., Gohil, J. R., Desai, R., Mehta, R. R., & Chaudhary, V. P. (2016). Correlation of blood culture results with the sepsis score and sepsis screen in the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal septicemia. Journal of Clinical Neonatology, 5(3), 193.

Correlation of blood culture results with the sepsis score and sepsis screen in the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal septicemia Hassan HR, Gohil JR, Desai R, Mehta RR, Chaudhary VP - J Clin Neonatol
 

4          Kishore, E., & Sreedhar, S. V. S. (2017). Clinical study of neonatal septicemia with reference to early indicators of sepsis. International Journal of Contemporary Pediatrics, 4(5), 1775.

https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ee68/b98fc80b049ec5401d554b6c29de80de641e.pdf

5         Alpay, Y., Aykin, N., Korkmaz, P., Gulduren, H. M., & Caglan, F. C. (2018). Urinary tract infections in the geriatric patients. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 34(1), 67.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857032/

 

6       Bouza, C., López?Cuadrado, T., & Amate?Blanco, J. M. (2016). Characteristics, incidence and temporal trends of sepsis in elderly patients undergoing surgery. British Journal of Surgery, 103(2), e73-e82.

http://www.surgeon.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Bouza_et_al-British_Journal_of_Surgery.pdf

7       Ferguson, A., Coates, D. E., Osborn, S., Blackmore, C. C., & Williams, B. (2019). Early, Nurse-Directed Sepsis Care. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 119(1), 52-58.

8.        Goudie, R., Gharbi, M., Drysdale, J. H., Lishman, H., Molokhia, M., Johnson, A. P., ... & Aylin, P. (2019). Antibiotic management of urinary tract infection in elderly patients in primary care and its association with bloodstream infections and all cause mortality: population based cohort study. Research, 364.

Antibiotic management of urinary tract infection in elderly patients in primary care and its association with bloodstream infections and all cause mortality: population based cohort study

11        Howell, M. D., & Davis, A. M. (2017). Management of sepsis and septic shock. Jama, 317(8), 847-848.

9       Liang, S. Y. (2016). Sepsis and other infectious disease emergencies in the elderly. Emergency Medicine Clinics, 34(3), 501-522.

Sepsis and other Infectious Disease Emergencies in the Elderly

10    Rowe, T. A., & Juthani-Mehta, M. (2014). Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection in older adults. Infectious disease clinics of North America, 28(1), 75.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4079031/

 

 

11.        Predictive factors of urinary tract infections among the oldest old in the general population. a population-based prospective follow-up study

12.        Antibiotic management of urinary tract infection in elderly patients in primary care and its association with bloodstream infections and all cause mortality: population based cohort study

 

13.            GPs’ attitudes towards the diagnosis and treatment of male urinary tract infections: a qualitative interview study in Ireland

 

14        https://annals.org/aim/article-abstract/714605/increasing-antimicrobial-resistance-management-uncomplicated-community-acquired-urinary-tract-infections?doi=10.7326%2f0003-4819-135-1-200107030-00012