strayer jwi555 week 10 assignment 3 part 2 - Part II: Team Project Paper latest 2016 january
$VVLJQPHQW3DUW,,
Assignment 3: Organizational Change and Culture Project
Part II: Team Project Paper (4-5 pages)
Due Week 10, Day 7 (Weight: 14%)
Meet with your assigned team to share and discuss your change plans and vision videos. Remember, this is an opportunity to grow your perspective and provide constructive feedback to peers.
1. Set a time to meet with your assigned team in week 9 or early in week 10.
2. Post your business brief and videos in the team discussion forum in week 9 and review each team member’s brief and video.
3. As a team, write and submit a 4-5 page paper that compares and contrasts each project. Focus on similarities and differences.
• Analyze each vision, each approach, the timeline, the intended results, the tools proposed, and the effectiveness of Kotter’s eight-stage framework in relation to each project.
• Draw conclusions on the effectiveness or areas of improvement for each change management plan.
• Discuss best practices and unresolved issues.
• What have you learned from this collaboration? Be sure to support your points and use references.
Professional Formatting Recommendations:
• Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, your name, professor’s name, and the course title and date. (The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required page length.)
• Single-spaced, professional font (Times New Roman or Ariel), 10-12 font size
• Headings used to identify main topics and subtopics
• Paragraphs are separated by a single space
$VVLJQPHQW3DUW,,
|
Weight: 14% |
Assignment 3 Part II: Team Project Paper |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory |
Low Pass |
Pass |
High Pass |
Honors |
|
1. Compare and contrast the individual change projects and change vision videos. Weight: 85% |
Team project paper does not or unsatisfactorily addresses all criteria elements listed in an analytic way. Similarities and differences between each project are not identified and/or explanation is poor. Little to no synthesis of ideas is demonstrated and logical reasoning is not included or evident. |
Team project paper partially addresses all criteria elements listed in an analytical way. Similarities and differences between each project are partially identified. Partially demonstrates synthesis of ideas and logical reasoning from a course concepts. Assertions lack clarity and/or conciseness. |
Team project paper satisfactorily addresses all criteria elements listed in an analytical way. Similarities and differences between each project are satisfactorily identified. Demonstrates some synthesis of ideas and understanding of course concepts. Assertions may lack some clarity and conciseness and/or may not be highly persuasive or thoroughly supported. |
Team project paper completely addresses all criteria elements listed in an analytical way. Similarities and differences between each project are completely identified. Demonstrates synthesis of ideas and understanding of course concepts. Assertions are mostly clear, concise, persuasive, and well-supported. |
Team project paper exemplarily addresses all criteria elements listed in an analytical way while demonstrating thought leadership. Similarities and differences between each project are exemplarily identified. Demonstrates critical analysis, excellent synthesis of ideas, and understanding of course concepts and unique insights. Assertions are clear, concise, persuasive, and supported by sources and logical reasoning. |
2
Assignment 3 Part II
|
Weight: 14% |
Assignment 3 Part II: Team Project Paper |
||||
|
Criteria |
Unsatisfactory |
Low Pass |
Pass |
High Pass |
Honors |
|
2. The team paper is logical, professionally formatted, includes in-text citations, references, and is free from grammatical errors. Weight: 15% |
The team paper is illogical and unprofessional and contains multiple mechanics and usage errors. References and citations may be missing. |
The team paper is somewhat logical and semiprofessional in format. Sources may not be consistently cited and/or the reference list is incomplete or improperly formatted. Several mechanics and usage errors make parts of the text difficult for the reader to understand. |
The team paper is satisfactorily logical and professional in format. Sources are not always consistently cited in-text and the reference list may not be appropriately formatted. There may be a few mechanics and usage errors, but they do not have a major impact on the flow. |
The team paper is logical and professionally formatted. Most sources are consistently cited in-text and the reference list is included. Mechanics and usage errors, if any, are minor and have no impact on the flow. |
The team paper is highly logical and professionally formatted. All sources are consistently cited in-text and references are included in a manner that enables the reader to quickly identify sources. There are no mechanics or usage errors. |
3 3
-
Rating:
/5
Solution: strayer jwi555 week 10 assignment 3 part 2 - Part II: Team Project Paper latest 2016 january