SPC3210 - How might Giles define effective communication

Question # 00864453 Posted By: wildcraft Updated on: 12/06/2024 04:04 AM Due on: 12/06/2024
Subject English Topic General English Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

English SPC3210- Weekly Assignment 10

Read Ch. 25 & 26

Answer the questions separately, linking concepts and theories from the text. 

1.  How might Giles define effective communication? How might other theorists in this book approach this concept? Where do you stand on the issue?

2.  Thinking back to Geertz and Pacanowsky's cultural approach, how might one discover the areas in need of accommodation? 

3.  Are the strategies of emotional expression, passive aggression, and third-party help viewed positively or negatively by most Americans? Can you think of situations in which one or more of these strategies might be more effective than any of the traditional five styles (avoiding, obliging, compromising, dominating, and integrating)? 

4.  How might Baxter respond to Ting-Toomey's face-negotiation theory?

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00859972 Posted By: wildcraft Posted on: 12/06/2024 04:05 AM
    Puchased By: 2
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of SPC3210 - How might Giles define effective communication...
    Attachments
    SPC3210_-_How_might_Giles_define_effective_communication.ZIP (18.96 KB)

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Whatsapp Lisa