Rasmussen CBA45 Module 06 General Psychology Credit by Assessment 2019

Experiments and Studies

 

This brief article outlines the highlights and flaws of the Stanford Prison Experiment and discusses why it is still controversial.

 

One of Psychology's most famous experiments was flawed

 

Solomon Asch's study examines conformity. Consider what you would have done in a similar situation. This article offers a deeper understanding of the implications of Asch's study and other considerations researchers of the time ignored.

 

Out of the Asch Study

 

APA Code of Ethics

 

 

 

Instructions

 

Researchers must protect participants and be aware of appropriate methods for obtaining information. What ethical considerations are important to research? In about 2pages, write an analysis of the ethical concerns in the 3 diverse psychological research studies below. Be sure to include a paragraph of overall ethical consideration.

 

This paper should be 2-3 pages in length and use APA formatting (cover page, paper body formatting, citations, and references: see Rasmussen's APA guide in the Resources tab, or by clicking here. Prior to submitting your paper, be sure you proofread your work to check your spelling and grammar. If you use any outside sources, please cite those sources in APA citation format.

 

Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. D. (2012). Contesting the 'nature' of conformity: What Milgram and Zimbardo's studies really show. Plos Biology, 10(11), doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001426

 

Larsen, K. S. (1974). Conformity in the Asch experiment. The Journal Of Social Psychology, 94(2), 303-304. doi:10.1080/00224545.1974.9923224

 

Mischel, W., Ayduk, O., Berman, M. G., Casey, B. J., Gotlib, I. H., Jonides, J., & ... Shoda, Y. (2011). 'Willpower' over the life span: Decomposing self-regulation. Social Cognitive And Affective Neuroscience, 6(2), 252-256. doi:10.1093/scan/nsq081

 

Grading Rubric

 

F

 

F

 

C

 

B

 

A

 

0

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

Did not Submit

 

No Pass

 

Competence

 

Proficiency

 

Mastery

 

Not Submitted

 

No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 1.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, but lacks explanation.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, but explanation is underdeveloped.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 1, fully explains.

 

Not Submitted

 

No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 2.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, but lacks explanation.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, but explanation is underdeveloped.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 2, fully explains.

 

Not Submitted

 

No analysis of ethical concerns from paper 3.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, but lacks explanation.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, but explanation is underdeveloped.

 

Analyzes ethical concerns from paper 3, fully explains.

 

Not Submitted

 

No noticeable attempt to define anyethical considerations

 

Attempts to define ethical considerations with some supporting evidence.

 

Attempts to define ethical considerations with adequate supporting evidence.

 

Thoroughly critiques define ethical considerationswith strong supporting evidence.