Purdue PA260 2020 March Unit 1 Discussion Latest

PA260 Criminal Law

Unit 1 Discussion

In the interest of conducting a lively, engaging Discussion, please keep the following in mind:

Opposing viewpoints are key to any vibrant discussion, but remember to use internet etiquette and be respectful of your classmates' views and opinions. Provide constructive feedback or ask clarifying questions if you do not understand a classmate's comment. Most importantly, have fun interacting with the unit content, your classmates, and your instructor!

For Discussion requirements, refer to your course Syllabus or to the Discussion Rubric, posted in Course Documents.

Spotlight On Ethics: Could You Defend a Killer?

Criminal defense attorneys have a tough job. They often have to represent those who are accused of committing atrocious crimes, and to do so requires them to meet with clients in maximum security prisons. They can face threats from unhappy clients who expect acquittal despite overwhelming evidence, and scrutiny and criticism by the public for representing “monsters.” However, criminal defense attorneys are ethically bound to zealously advocate for the interests of their clients, regardless of what the charge is or whether the client admits guilt. For this Discussion, visit the New York Times article about alleged serial killer Robert Durst. Durst is the subject of an HBO documentary called "The Jinx."

You can locate the article at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/24/nyregion/durst-is-denied-bail-at-hearing-in-new-orleans.html?_r=0. After reading the article, discuss whether you could represent someone like Durst if asked to do so by a court. Please comment on at least one of your classmate’s posts.