NR660 Week 3: Project Literature 2019
Week 3: Project Literature
Review Guidelines
The purpose of this assignment is to
- Provide learners with the opportunity to integrate the knowledge and skills learned throughout the program
- Provide learners with the opportunity to communicate a scholarly project in a professional manner
Due Date
Submit by 11:59 pm MT Sunday of Week 3.
Complete database search on your project and compile results. Focus on most relevant articles or studies that address your problem/concern or discuss resolutions to the problem; include any studies that do not support your projected resolution or take a different approach. In addition, search for systematic reviews about the problem/concern. Write a review of the literature that includes:
- Comprehensive review of the current evidence-based (EB) literature from nursing and related disciplines as appropriate
- Application of evidence-based literature to project
- Analysis of the literature: if it supports (or does not support) your resolution; alternative solutions; how existing literature affected your proposal
For assistance with literature review, see websites in Course Resources.
- Page length: 5-6 pages, excluding reference and title pages
- Minimum number of articles/studies = 10
- APA format 6th edition
- Correct reference citation format
- Reference page
|
Category |
Points |
% |
Description |
|
Current evidence-based literature |
50 |
33% |
Include a brief introduction to guide the reader through your paper. Current evidence-based literature from nursing and related disciplines as applies to project topic. |
|
Application of evidence-based literature |
40 |
27% |
Application of evidenced-based literature to your specific project and intervention. |
|
Analysis of literature |
40 |
27% |
Analysis of the Literature; does the literature support the project/intervention; if so, how? |
|
Conclusion |
10 |
7% |
Summary and concluding statements. |
|
Mechanics of writing, APA |
10 |
7% |
Grammar, Spelling, APA |
|
Total |
150 |
100 |
A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the above requirements. |
|
Assignment Criteria |
Exceptional (100%) Outstanding or highest level of performance |
Exceeds (88%) Very good or high level of performance |
Meets (80%) Competent or satisfactory level of performance |
Needs Improvement (38%) Poor or failing level of performance |
Developing (0) Unsatisfactory level of performance |
||
|
Current evidence based literature from nursing and related disciplines |
50 Points |
44 Points |
40 Points |
19 Points |
0 Points |
||
|
Must do a synthesis review of 10 articles; 8 from 10 must be of scholarly sources and 5 or years date. Appropriate significance is assigned to the information and irrelevant information excluded |
More than 2 articles in the review are not from scholarly sources or dated. Awareness of the literature present with minimal gaps noted. Most Information used appropriately for its significance |
Synthesis of articles is not evident. Awareness of the literature present but many gaps are noted. Information used inappropriately for its significance or irrelevant information included |
A total of 10 articles (8 that must be from scholarly sources) were not reviewed. Awareness of the literature is not present and little relevant or accurate information. |
Research is absent or demonstrates inappropriate use of information |
|||
|
Application of evidenced-based literature
|
40 Points |
35 Points |
32 Points |
15 Points |
0 Points |
||
|
Application to problem/concern is fully developed and comprehensive |
Application to problem/concern is adequately present or evidence-based literature mostly linked to project |
Application to problem/concern is minimally present or evidence-based literature not always linked to project |
Evidence-based literature is not linked to project |
Application to problem/concern is absent |
|||
|
Analysis of the literature |
40 Points |
35 Points |
32 Points |
15 Points |
0 Points |
||
|
Literature analysis is fully developed; comprehensive; significance-thoroughly discusses how the literature supports the project or identifies a lack of literature; alternative intervention options identified |
Literature analysis is adequately developed; significance of a few articles literature is not addressed |
Literature analysis is minimally developed; significance of a some literature is not addressed |
Discussion of significance of major literature lacking |
Literature analysis is absent |
|||
|
Conclusion |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
||
|
Provides distinct summary with concluding statements regarding the future direction and focus of the project; reflects key elements of the paper |
Provides distinct summary with concluding statements regarding the future direction and focus of the project; does not summarize key elements of the paper |
Provides distinct summary with no concluding statements; no summarization of key elements of the paper |
No distinct summary; concluding statements found at the end in the general body of the paper. |
No distinct summary or conclusion provided. |
|||
|
Grammar, Spelling, APA |
10 Points |
9 Points |
8 Points |
4 Points |
0 Points |
||
|
Grammar, APA and spelling correct with minimal errors |
Two to three errors in APA, grammar, spelling, and syntax and/or citations are missing |
Four to six errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing |
Seven errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing |
Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing |
|||
|
|
|
Total Points Possible = 150 points |
|||||
-
Rating:
/5
Solution: NR660 Week 3: Project Literature 2019