Category

Points

Description

Introduction

20

Introduction of topic that include pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Clinical Assessment

5

Discussed typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic.

Differential Diagnoses

20

List AND discuss of a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses with scholarly support.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis.

Prevention and Treatment Options

10

Discuss prevention and treatment options for chosen topic.

Education

10

Discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10

Discuss best practices for optimal outcomes.

Lead Discussion

10

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) discussion question for peers.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10

By Friday, 11:59 p.m. MT, Interactive dialogue with at least two peer’s initial presentation by responding substantively to all questions posed and citing related research to support.

Summary Requirement

10

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, add summary post to own grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Include conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

Evidence Based Research/Articles

10

Include minimal of three (3) evidence based research and/or Peer Reviewed articles from Chamberlain Online Library.

Evidence Based Practice Clinical Guidelines

10

Include a minimal of two (2) current (within last 5 years) EBP clinical guidelines.

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10

Responds to ALL faculty directed questions on initial presentation. Includes scholarly support from EBP clinical guidelines and/or peer reviewed journal articles obtained from Chamberlain Online Library.

Presentation Development

5

Overall Presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura. Labcoat and name badge are present.

Total

150

A quality assignment will meet or exceed all of the above requirements.

Criterion

Exceptional

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

Satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Content

Possible Points = 150

Introduction

20 Points

17 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic that include a detailed review of pathophysiology, epidemiology, and risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic, but omits one of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic but omits two of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors

OR

Provides vague description of 1-2 of the following criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic but omits all three of the following criteria: pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors

OR

Provides vague description of all three (2) criteria of pathophysiology, epidemiology or risk factors.

Does not present an Introduction of chosen grand rounds topic.

Clinical Assessment

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

1 Points

0 Points

Discusses in detail typical clinical assessment findings for chosen topic and etiology.

Describes in general the clinical assessment findings for chosen topic and etiology.

List of clinical assessment findings instead of a discussion with etiology for chosen topic and etiology.

Lists clinical assessment findings instead of a discussion with etiology for chosen topic without inclusion of etiology.

Does not describe clinical assessment findings.

Differential Diagnoses

20 Points

17 Points

16 Points

8 Points

0 Points

List AND discuss in detail a minimal of three (3) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

List AND discuss in detail two (2) differential diagnoses with scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

List three differential diagnosesbut does not include a discussionwith scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources

List two or less differential diagnosesbut does not include a discussionwith scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources

Does not list and discuss differential diagnoses.

Diagnostic Studies/Labs

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis and rationale and scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with rationale, but omits scholarly support from clinical guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Discuss diagnostic studies and labs that can be used to confirm diagnosis with scholarly support but omits rationale.

Vague discussion of of diagnostic studies and labs used to confirm diagnosis, omits both the rationales AND scholarly support from clinical. guidelines, research-based articles, or other appropriate provider-level resources.

Does not discuss diagnostic studies/labs.

Prevention and Treatment Options

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discuss prevention AND treatment options including first line medication and non-pharmacological options.

Discuss prevention AND treatment options including first line medication, does not include non-pharmacological option(s).

Discuss treatment options but does not include one of the following: first line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Discuss treatment options but does not include two or more of the following: first line medication, non-pharmacological option(s) or prevention.

Does not prevention and treatment options.

Education

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Discusses in detail patient AND family education for chosen grand rounds topic with rationales.

Provides a general discussion of patient and family education with rationales.

Lists patient and family education instead of a discussion with rationales.

Lists patient OR education instead of a discussion without inclusion of rationales.

OR

Information discussed is vague or unclear.

Does not discuss patient and family education.

Identify Outcomes

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication, including expected follow up care.

Describe optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication. Omits expected follow up care.

Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment. Includes expected follow up care.

Incorrectly identifies optimal outcomes after treatment with suggested medication AND omits expected follow up care.

Does not address outcomes.

Lead Discussion

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Fully, facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating three (3) open discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating at least two (2) discussion questions for peers. Questions posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic by incorporating at least one (1) discussion questions for peers. Question posed allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Attempt to facilitate discussion relevant to the presentation topic with two to three (2-3) questions BUT questions posed does not allow students to apply additional concepts or explore additional information relevant to the topic.

Does not lead discussion.

Interactive Dialogue with Student Peers

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Student responds substantively with additional insight to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to at least two different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT but response is not substantively OR does not add additional insight

Student responds substantively with additional insight to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to at least one different peer presentations by Friday 11:59 p.m. MT but response is not substantively OR does not add additional insight

Student does not participate in interactive dialogue by Sunday, 11:59pm MT

Summary Requirement

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation that summarizes the discussion. Includes conclusions from thecollective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds summary post to the original grand rounds presentation with conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic but information presented is not clear or difficult to follow.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary to the original grand rounds presentation but omits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic.

By Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT, adds a summary BUT does not summarizes the initial discussion ANDomits conclusions from the collective group discussion on the topic

Student does not post a summary by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT.

Evidence Based Research/Articles

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Include three (3) evidence based research or Peer Reviewed articles (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library.

Include two (2) evidence based research or Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library

Include one (1) evidence based research or Peer Reviewed articles current (within last 5 years) from Chamberlain Online Library

Includes two or more articles for support but articles are not research or peer-reviewed from Chamberlain Online Library

OR

Two or more articles are older than 5 years

Does not include evidence based research or peer reviewed articles from Chamberlain Online Library

Evidence Based Practice Clinical Guidelines

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Include a minimal of two (2) current (within last 5 years) EBP clinical guidelines.

Includes a minimal of two (2) EBP clinical guidelines but guidelines presented are older than 5 years.

Includes one (1) current (within last 5 years) EBP clinical guidelines.

Includes one (1) EBP clinical guidelines but guidelines presented is older than 5 years.

Does not present evidence based practice guidelines.

Interactive Dialogue with Faculty

10 Points

9 Points

8 Points

4 Points

0 Points

Student responds substantively with additional insight to all faculty directed questions. This includes question(s) to the individual student and any questions posed to the class as a whole by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds substantively to at least one faculty directed questions by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to two or more faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student responds to only one faculty directed questions, but post is not substantively by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Student does not participate in interactive dialogue with faculty by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT.

Presentation Development

5 Points

4 Points

3 Points

1 Points

0 Points

Overall presentation is clear, concise, and organized; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; recorded in Kaltura. Lab coat and name badge present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing one (1) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat, no name badge not present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing two (2) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat or name badge present.

Overall presentation is clear, concise but missing three (3) of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat or name badge present.

Overall presentation is not clear OR missing four or more of the following: organized, demonstration of ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources, recorded in Kaltura, no lab coat or name badge present.

Total Points

of 150 points