NR541 Interview with Informatics Nurse Specialist (INS)

Assignment Criteria

Points

%

Description

Introduction

34

23%

Theintroductionintroducesthetopicof the scope and standards of informatics practice, inclusive ofNIfunctional areas,andtheintervieweenamesthekeysections ofthepaper. No names are included to protect identity and privacy.

Interview Results

34

23%

Keyelementsoftheinterviewaresummarized withanemphasisondescribingthree primaryNIfunctionalareas, practice within the scope and standards of NI practiceinwhichtheintervieweepractices, as well as interdisciplinary/interprofessional efforts.Scholarlysupportispresent.

Analysis

34

23%

Differencesandsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctionalareas and scope and standards of practice andactualpracticeof the intervieweeareclearlyanalyzedinthestudent’sownwords,with depth,and analysisissupportedbyscholarlysources.

Conclusion

33

22%

Concludingstatementsclearly includethewriter’suniqueinsightsaboutNIfunctionalareasandthepracticeofnursinginformaticsgained fromcompletingthisassignment.

APA Formats

5

3%

Text,title page,andreferencepage(s)areconsistentwithAPAformat(zero to threeerrors).

Citations

5

3%

Ideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarecited andarecited correctly(zero to three errors).

Writing Mechanics

5

3%

Rulesofgrammar,spelling,wordusage,andpunctuationareconsistentwith formalwrittenwork(zero to threeerrors), paper meets page length.

Total

150

100%

Assignment Criteria

Exceptional

(100%)

Outstanding or highest level of performance

Exceeds

(88%)

Very good or high level of performance

Meets

(80%)

Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Needs Improvement

(38%)

Poor or failing level of performance

Developing

(0)

Unsatisfactory level of performance

Introduction

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Introduction clearly introducesthetopicofNIfunctionalareas, identifiestheintervieweebyrole (not name)andtypeoforganization, andnamesthekeysectionsofthepaper.

Introduction clearlypresentsonlytwo oftherequired sections.

Introduction clearlypresentsonlyone oftherequired sections.

Introduction doesnotclearly addressanyofthethreerequiredsections.

Nointroductionispresent.

Interview

Results

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Key elements of the interview are summarized with the three primary NI functional areas of INS practice described clearly.

Exemplars of interdisciplinary/interprofessional collaboration are included.

Scholarly support.is present and relevant. .

Key elements of the interview are summarized. The NI functional areas in which the interviewee practices are mentioned but not clearly described.

Interdisciplinary/ interprofessional collaboration is mentioned but not elaborated.

Scholarly sources are provided but support is not clearly stated

Functional areas of practice are not addressed

OR

There is no mention of Interdisciplinary/ interprofessional role or collaboration.

Scholarly sources are present but support is not well-established.

Key elements of the interview are not present,

OR

the interview summary lacks scholarly support.

Interview results are not present.

Analysis

34 Points

30 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasareclearlyanalyzedin-depth.

Theanalysisissupportedby

scholarlysources.

Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasareanalyzedsuperficially. Analysisissupportedbyscholarlysources.

Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublished descriptionsofNIfunctionalareasandactualpracticeofthosefunctionalareasarepresentedbutnotanalyzed.Scholarlysupportispresent.

Differencesand/orsimilarities betweenpublisheddescriptionsofNIfunctional areasandactual practiceofthose functionalareasare

notpresented,

ORscholarlysupportisnotpresentinthissection.

An analysis is not present.

Conclusion

33 Points

29 Points

27 Points

13 Points

0 Points

Concluding statements clearly include the writer’s unique insights about NI functional areas and the practice of nursing informatics gained from completing this assignment.

Concluding statements include statements about NI functional areas and the practice of nursing informatics, but lack clear presentation of the writer’s unique insights gained from completing this assignment.

Conclusion partially addresses either functional areas or writer’s insights.

Conclusion is present but does not address either functional areas or writer’s insights.

Conclusion is not present.

APA Formats

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Zero to twoerrors ofAPAformatintext,title page,andreference page(s).

Three to fiveAPAformaterrors intext,titlepage, andreference page(s).

Six to sevenAPAformaterrors intext,titlepage, orreference page(s).

Nine or moreAPAformaterrorsin text,titlepage,or referencepages(s).

Citations

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Allideasandinformation fromothersourcesarecited.

One to threeinstancesinwhichideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarenotcited or lackmatching.references

Four to sixinstancesinwhichideasandinformationfrom othersourcesarenotcitedorlackmatching references.

Seven or moreinstancesinwhichideasandinformation fromothersourcesarenotcited or lack matching references.

Writing Quality

5 Points

4 Points

3Points

0 Points

Zero to three errorsingrammar, spelling,wordusage, punctuation,andotherelementsofwritingAND

papermeetslength requirement

Four to sixerrors ingrammar,spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andotherelementsofwriting ANDpapermeetslength requirements

Seven to nineerrors ingrammar,spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andotherelementsofwriting ANDpapermeetslength. requirements

Ten or moreerrorsingrammar, spelling,wordusage,punctuation,andother elementsofwriting, OR

paperfails tomeetlength requirements.

150 Total Points _____ of 150 Points