NR538 2021 September Week 6 Assignment Latest

NR538 Population Health I Assessment and Analysis of Data
Week 6 Assignment
Analysis and Recommendations
Purpose
During the NR 538 course, assignments build upon one another as you conduct an assessment of population health within the context of the community. The first and second assignments involved assessment of the core and community subsystems. In the third assignment, analysis of data will be conducted to determine priority needs and propose recommendations to improve population health.
Analysis of data is a pivotal component of population health assessment that requires clinical judgment and a critical appraisal of quantitative and qualitative findings. Analysis allows for the identification of strengths, risks, and disparity that are present within the population. Determining community assets, gaps, supports and barriers to health can facilitate effective resource allocation and action plans to promote population outcomes.
The purpose of this assignment is to critically appraise population and community subsystem assessment findings in order to determine priority needs and propose recommendations to improve the health of the target population.
PURPOSE
During the NR 538 course, assignments build upon one another as you conduct an assessment of population health within the context of the community. The first and second assignments involved assessment of the core and community subsystems. In the third assignment, analysis of data will be conducted to determine priority needs and propose recommendations to improve population health.
Analysis of data is a pivotal component of population health assessment that requires clinical judgment and a critical appraisal of quantitative and qualitative findings. Analysis allows for the identification of strengths, risks, and disparity that are present within the population. Determining community assets, gaps, supports and barriers to health can facilitate effective resource allocation and action plans to promote population outcomes.
The purpose of this assignment is to critically appraise population and community subsystem assessment findings in order todetermine priority needs and propose recommendations to improve the health of the target population.
COURSE LEARNING OUTCOMES
Through this assignment, the student will address the following course learning outcomes:
• CO 2:Differentiate population health risks and disparities based upon analysis of assessment findings (PO #1 and 5)
• CO 3:Using assessment findings, develop strategies to advance population health outcomes (POs 1, 2, and 5)
ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW
Critically analyzepopulation core and community subsystem assessment data and findings gathered earlier in the course.
• Identify health-related strengths, risks, and problems evident in assessment findings.
• Determine community supports and barriers evident in assessment findings that can influence population health.
Synthesize findings in order to draw conclusions and prioritize population health needs.
• Identify two priority population health problems, risks or needs based upon analysis of assessment findings.
• Include rationale to support your conclusions, includingqualitative and quantitative findings from the assessment.
Propose recommendations to improve population health.
• Select one of the priority population health problem, risk, or need and proposed recommendations to improve population health in this area.
• Include support from scholarly literature to validate your recommendations.
Create a scholarly written paper to present your analysis and recommendations.
• The paper should be 3 – 5 pages in length.
• Include a minimum of 4 scholarly sourcesto validate your analysis and recommendations.
• Follow the assignment criteria and rubric expectations described below to address each of the following:
o Introduction
o Population Core: Strengths, Risks, and Problems
o Community Subsystems: Supports and Barriers
o Priority Population HealthProblem, Risk, or Need
o Recommendation
o Conclusion
ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
1. Abide by the Chamberlain College of Nursing Academic Integrity Policy.
2. Create the scholarly written paper using Microsoft Word.
3. Sources older than five years may not be used without the permission of the class professor.
4. Scholarly sources required for the assignment must besources that are separate from course-related sources and/or reading assignments.
a. If used as a source in the assignment, course-related sourcesor readings must be in addition to the minimum number of scholarly sources required for the assignment.
b. If used as a source in the assignment, course-related sources or readings must meet the criteria for scholarly work current within five years.
5. Title page, pagination, subheadings, body of paper, citation of sources, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual.
6. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, sentence and paragraph structure are followed and consistent with formal, scholarly writing as noted in the APA Manual (current edition).
7. No more than one short direct quote (15 words or less) may be used in this assignment.
8. First person should not be used within this assignment.
REVISION PROCESS
If you do not receive at least a proficient rating in any contentcategory, you can re-submit your assignment with revision to that content category to improve the points earned within that specific section. Please note the following guidelines:
• After receiving your assignment grade, you have one opportunity to resubmit.
• In order to resubmit, your initial submission must have been a complete assignment. Rough drafts will not be graded or allowed for resubmission.
• Only content sections that did not receive at least a proficient rating with the first submission may be revised to earn a better score in that content category. APA format and writing style will not be re-graded.
• Any revision must be submitted for re-evaluation within 7 days after the assignment grade is posted. For example, if your assignment grade is posted on Friday at 12 noon MT, you have until the following Friday at 12 noon MT to resubmit any content area that did not earn a proficient rating.
• Within 7 days from your resubmission, the class instructor will post your score for the resubmitted work.
Steps to follow for resubmission of a content section within an assignment that did not earn a proficient rating on the rubric:
• Contact your class instructor privately via email, phone, or Canvas private message to inform him/her that you plan to resubmit a content section of the assignment that did not receive a proficient rating on the rubric.
• Submit the assignment in its entirety (including the rewritten content section) within 7 days of the original assignment grade being posted.

-
Rating:
5/
Solution: NR538 2021 September Week 6 Assignment Latest