Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. was a tenant in a building
Question # 00577466
Posted By:
Updated on: 08/23/2017 05:03 AM Due on: 08/23/2017
Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. was a tenant in a building that was protected against fire by a sprinkler and alarm system maintained by the American District Telegraph Co. (ADT). Because of the latter's fault, the controls on the system were defective and allowed the discharge of water into the building, which damaged Melodee's property. When Melodee sued ADT, its defense was that its service contract limited its liability to 10 percent of the annual service charge made to the customer. Was this limitation valid?Why or why not?
-
Rating:
/5
Solution: Melodee Lane Lingerie Co. was a tenant in a building