LAUREATE MGMT6000 – Dynamic Leadership Assessment 2

ASSESSMENT BRIEF |
||
Subject Code and Title |
MGMT6000 – Dynamic Leadership |
|
Assessment |
Assessment 2 - Reflexive Journal |
|
Individual/Group |
Individual |
|
Length |
2,000 words |
|
Learning Outcomes |
a), b), c), d) |
|
Submission |
Due Friday, 23:55 (Sydney). End of Module 6 |
|
Weighting |
50% |
|
Total Marks |
100 |
|
Objectives: |
• Prepare a Personal and Professional Development Plan (PPDP) for your continued leadership development, drawing on your reflections and insights from the first assessment task (including feedback from your partner and other sources and your learning from this subject);
• Continue to increase self-awareness by deep thinking about your values and their influence on your life and career goals;
• Identify critical gaps between your current capabilities or sphere of influence and your leadership aspirations;
• Identify the influences of national and organisational cultures on your leadership perspectives and the implications for leading in different cultures;
• Apply knowledge from the theories and models of effective leadership to inform and guide your development plan.
How the assessment fits into the subject/course:
The focus on reflexive research methodologies and strategies is a core element of the MBA. This assessment provides you with opportunities to build on your personal reflections, apply the principles of strategic thinking and planning to your own life and prepare a personal development plan.
Assessment Linkages of Assessment 1 and Assessment 2:
Insights and understandings obtained in Assessment 1 will suggest themes that will be developed further to inform your planning in Assessment 2.
MGMT6000_Dynamic-Leadership_Assessment_Brief_2 |
1 |
Instructions:
Each student will prepare a Personal and Professional Development Plan (PPDP) for continued leadership development. The period of the plan depends on your current career and life stage. It should cover a minimum of two years but could be 5 or 10 years. Select a time frame that makes sense to you and briefly explain why.
Select a model or framework of personal and leadership development that resonates with you and briefly justify your choice. Ensure that the components of your plan are anchored by appropriate leadership theory and models.
You should consider the influence of national and organisational cultures and social practices on your current leadership perspectives and how you can be effective as a future leader in other cultures, as we operate in an increasingly global economy.
Output/Deliverable and parameters of the assessment:
Each student will submit a report which contains your PPDP and brief explanations. The report can be in Word or PDF format of 2,000 words or an equivalent in PPT (landscape) format with voice-over explanations.
Resources to be provided:
? Planning templates in the Activities sections of Modules 4 and 5.
? The Learning Facilitator will suggest a range of possible models for leadership development.
? A range of e?textbooks and journals is available through online journal databases, including EBSCO.
Learning Outcomes:
• Increased self-awareness, including personal values, personality preferences, leadership style and impact on other people as a basis for achieving potential.
• Knowledge of the major theories and models of leadership and their role in explaining and developing effective leadership.
• Understanding of reflective practice as a means of research and personal growth.
• Greater understanding of the influence of cultural and social backgrounds on leadership effectiveness in own and other cultures.
• Capacity to apply the principles of strategic thinking and planning to own life and career.
• Confidence and courage to proceed with the implementation of a personal development plan.
MGMT6000_Dynamic-Leadership_Assessment_Brief_2 |
2 |
Learning Rubric
Assessment |
Fail (0-49) |
Pass |
Credit |
Distinction |
High Distinction |
|
Attributes |
(50-64) |
(65-74) |
(75-84) |
(85-100) |
||
Effective |
Difficult to understand, |
Information, arguments and |
Information, arguments |
Information, arguments |
Expertly presented; the |
|
communication |
no logical/clear |
evidence are presented in a |
and evidence are well |
and evidence are very |
presentation is logical, |
|
in report |
structure, poor flow of |
way that is not always clear |
presented, mostly clear |
well presented; the |
persuasive, and well |
|
ideas, argument lacks |
and logical. |
flow of ideas and |
presentation is logical, |
supported by evidence, |
||
supporting evidence. |
arguments. |
clear and well supported |
demonstrating a clear flow |
|||
25% |
Audience cannot |
Line of reasoning is often |
Line of reasoning is easy to |
by evidence. |
of ideas and arguments. |
|
difficult to follow. |
Uses limited presentation |
Engages and sustains |
||||
follow the line of |
follow. |
|||||
reasoning. |
aids to enhance |
audience’s interest in the |
||||
information and |
topic. |
|||||
arguments. |
||||||
Effective use of diverse |
||||||
presentation aids, including |
||||||
graphics and/or media. |
||||||
Knowledge of and |
Neglects core elements |
Demonstrates |
Articulates insights into |
Analyses own cultural |
Actively assumes and describes |
|
sensitivity to cultural |
important to leadership |
understanding of the |
own cultural biases. |
biases against elements |
leadership roles that influences |
|
diversity and |
in own and other |
complexity of elements |
important to members |
others and enable positive |
||
implications for |
cultures. |
important to leadership in |
Demonstrates evidence of |
of other cultures. |
change in own and other |
|
effective leadership |
Difficulty in identifying own |
own and other cultures. |
adjustment in own attitudes |
Describes implications |
cultures. |
|
and beliefs reflecting |
||||||
20% |
cultural biases. |
learning from a diversity of |
for own development. |
|||
communities and cultures. |
||||||
Chifley_TUA_Leadership_Dynamics_Assessment_Brief_2
4
Application of |
Limited understanding |
Understands the main |
Understands comprehensive |
Understands comprehensive |
Demonstrates deep |
|
knowledge to practice |
of theories and models |
theories and models of |
range of theories and |
range of theories and |
understanding of a |
|
of leadership. |
effective leadership. |
models of leadership. |
models of leadership. |
comprehensive range of theories |
||
20% |
Uses a limited range of |
Applies basic concepts to |
Selects and justifies |
Selects and critically |
and models of leadership. |
|
information or sources as |
explain own experiences |
appropriate models to |
evaluates most relevant |
Selects and critically evaluates |
||
the basis of |
and practice. |
explain own experiences |
models to deepen |
most relevant models to deepen |
||
interpretations or |
and practice. |
understanding and insights |
understanding and insights into |
|||
recommendations. |
into own experiences, biases |
own experiences, biases styles |
||||
styles and preferences. |
and preferences. |
|||||
Describes implications and |
Describes implications and |
|||||
opportunities for personal |
opportunities for personal |
|||||
growth and development. |
growth and development and |
|||||
realistic strategies for |
||||||
broadening own repertoire of |
||||||
leadership behaviours. |
||||||
Personal |
Vague or unspecified |
Sets clear goals and time |
Sets clear, challenging, |
Demonstrates deep |
Demonstrates deep |
|
development |
goals. |
frames. |
achievable goals. |
understanding of current |
understanding of current |
|
planning |
Unclear steps or |
Describes specific steps |
Describes steps and |
capability, the gap between |
capability, the gap between |
|
reality and aspirations and |
reality and aspirations and |
|||||
20% |
processes. |
and strategies with |
strategies and why they are |
describes realistic and |
describes realistic and creative |
|
appropriate time frames. |
consistent with own |
creative actions to bridge |
actions to bridge the gap. |
|||
preferences, values and |
the gap. |
Able to combine strategic |
||||
styles. |
Able to combine strategic |
|||||
planning with “intelligent |
||||||
Aware of multiple options |
planning with “intelligent |
opportunism”. |
||||
and strategies to support |
opportunism”. |
Demonstrates capacity for |
||||
own development. |
||||||
continuous and “double loop” |
||||||
learning (learning how to learn) |
||||||
in relation to own development. |
||||||
Chifley_TUA_Leadership_Dynamics_Assessment_Brief_2
5
Enhanced self |
Limited awareness of |
awareness |
own capability or impact |
on others. |
|
20% |
Reluctant to seek or act |
on feedback from others |
|
Understands key events, people or experiences that have influenced own leadership development.
Describes own strengths and areas for development, based on appropriate evidence and feedback.
Shows deep understanding of events, people or experiences that have influenced own leadership development.
Describes own strengths and areas for development, based on appropriate evidence and feedback.
Understands and describes own personality preferences, leadership styles or results of other, relevant leadership assessment instrument.
Shows deep understanding of events, people or experiences that have influenced own leadership development.
Describes own strengths and areas for development, based on appropriate evidence and feedback
Understands and describes own personality preferences, leadership styles or results of other, relevant leadership assessment instrument and is aware of implications.
Demonstrates understanding of the link between self-awareness and emotional intelligence.
Shows deep understanding of events, people or experiences that have influenced own leadership development.
Describes own strengths and areas for development, based on appropriate evidence and feedback.
Understands and describes own personality preferences, leadership styles or results of other, relevant leadership assessment instrument, is aware of implications and takes appropriate action to modify behaviours where necessary.
Demonstrates deep understanding of the link between self-awareness and emotional intelligence and takes effective measures to enhance EQ.
Chifley_TUA_Leadership_Dynamics_Assessment_Brief_2
6

-
Rating:
5/
Solution: LAUREATE MGMT6000 – Dynamic Leadership Assessment 2
Solution: LAUREATE MGMT6000 – Dynamic Leadership Assessment 2
Solution: LAUREATE MGMT6000 – Dynamic Leadership Assessment 2