GC PSY510 week 5 case study assignment latest 2016 june

Question # 00315835 Posted By: solutionshere Updated on: 06/11/2016 05:40 PM Due on: 07/11/2016
Subject Psychology Topic General Psychology Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image
Details:

Read Case 4: Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect on pages 359-360 in your textbook. Once you have read the case study completely, answer the discussion questions found in the attached document “Case 4” under the assignment tab.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.



PSY-510 Contemporary and Ethical Issues in Psychology

Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect

Directions:In a minimum of 50 words, for each question, thoroughly answer each of the questions belowregarding Case 4: Research on Intimate Partner Violence and the Duty to Protect. Use in-text citations, when appropriate, according to APA formatting.

1. Why is this an ethical dilemma? Which APA Ethical Principles help frame the nature of the dilemma?

2. Who are the stakeholders and how will they be affected by how Dr. Yeung resolves this dilemma?

3. Does this situation meet the standards set by the Tarasoffdecision’s “duty to protect” statute (see Chapter 7)? How might whether or not Dr. Yeung’s state includes researchers under such a statute influence Dr. Yeung’s ethical decision making? How might the fact that Dr. Yeung is a research psychologist without training or licensure in clinical practice influence the ethical decision?

4. In addressing this dilemma, should Dr. Yeung consider how her decision may affect the completion of her research (e.g., the confidentiality concerns of other participants)?

5. How are APA Ethical Standards 2.01f, 3.04, 3.06, 4.01, 4.02, 4.05, and 8.01 relevant to this case? Which other standards might apply?

6. What are Dr. Yeung’s ethical alternatives for resolving this dilemma? Which alternative best reflects the Ethics Code aspirational principles and enforceable standards, legal standards, and obligations to stakeholders? Can you identify the ethical theory (discussed in Chapter 3) guiding your decision?

7. What steps should Dr. Yeung take to implement her decision and monitor its effect?

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00311287 Posted By: solutionshere Posted on: 06/11/2016 05:40 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    of privacy since she is ...
    Attachments
    week-5-case-study-assignment.docx (39.9 KB)
    Recent Feedback
    Rated By Feedback Comments Rated On
    iguo...njamin Rating Trustworthy and best services ever 03/15/2017

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Whatsapp Lisa