Fire prevention and fire suppression aspects are frequently

Question one (o6)

Fire prevention and fire suppression aspects are frequently structured and viewed as separate missions and operate in separate silos. Additionally, the fire prevention mission is often underfunded or the first budget line to be reduced during times of budget constrictions. From your perspective, how, if at all, might the application of community risk assessment and community risk reduction in your area integrate both prevention and suppression aspects into a sustainable model?

Question 2 (01)

Review “OSH Answers: Office Ergonomics” contained on the homepage of Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety (CCOHS). Then, comment on any information interesting to you.

Use the following URL to access “OSH Answers: Office Ergonomics”.

https://www.ccohs.ca/oshanswers/ergonomics/office/

Question 3(02)

Several organizations publish occupational exposure limits (OELs) including the Occupational Safety and Health Administration's (OSHA) permissible exposure limits (PELs), the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists' (ACGIH) threshold limit values (TLVs), and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health's (NIOSH) recommended exposure limits (RELs). Only OSHA's PELs are legally enforceable. Discuss why you would only use the OSHA PEL at a facility where you were the safety officer, or alternatively, why you would choose to use one of the other OELs or a combination of the OELs.