|
Criteria
A test of your
knowledge of mergers and acquisitions.
|
Excellent 90-100%
of Criteria Score
|
Satisfactory
70-89% of Criteria Score
|
Below Average
60-79% of Criteria Score
|
Unacceptable 0-59%
of Criteria Score
|
Comments
Final Score: XX of
89.80 points
|
|
25% Total
Assignment Points
|
Completeness
<<assignment specific
criteria>>
|
All directions are followed and
requirements are met. Work is labeled and well organized.
Each action item
offers a thorough response and supported or referenced response
|
Directions are largely followed and all
requirements are met. Work is labeled and largely organized.
|
Most directions are followed and most
requirements are met. Some labels missing or work is only somewhat
disorganized.
|
Directions are not followed and/or some requirements
are not met.
|
Section score: XX
of 22.45 points
|
|
40% Total
Assignment Points
|
Application of Concepts & Strength of
Analysis
<<assignment specific
criteria>>
|
Applies course concepts extremely
effectively, creating a full and informed project document; analysis is
sophisticated, accurate, and thorough; discussion is exceptionally skilled.
Responses move
beyond a definition or calculation result providing more insight to the
concepts linked to the course objectives
|
Applies course concepts throughout,
creating an effective project document; analysis is insightful and
essentially accurate; discussion is skilled.
|
Misapplies course concepts or applies them
infrequently; analysis is basic or general; discussion is haphazard or
cursory.
|
Fails to apply course concepts; analysis
is inadequate or missing.
|
Section score: XX
of 35.92 points
|
|
25% Total
Assignment Points
|
Organization
<<assignment specific
criteria>>
|
Ideas are arranged clearly and logically
to support the purpose or argument; ideas flow smoothly and are effectively
linked; the reader can follow the line of reasoning.The responses
provided (action statement) are accurate, informative, and written in such
a way to allow the reader to quickly understand the results of your
analysis.
|
Ideas are arranged adequately to support
the purpose or argument; links between ideas are generally clear; the
reader can follow the line of reasoning for the most part.
|
Ideas are arranged adequately, in general,
although ideas sometimes fail to make sense together; the reader remains fairly clear about what writer intends.
|
Ideas are arranged illogically; ideas
frequently fail to make sense together; the reader cannot identify a line
of reasoning and becomes frustrated or loses interest.
|
Section score: XX
of 22.45 points
|
|
10% Total
Assignment Points
|
Conventions and Writing Style
<<assignment specific
criteria>>
|
Language is especially clear and concise
and follows the conventions of Standard Written English, as well as the West
Writing Style Handbook when appropriate.
|
There are minor errors in the application
of Standard Written English or the West Writing Style Handbook.
|
There are fundamental errors in the
application of Standard Written English or West Writing Style Handbook
that impact clarity or effectiveness.
|
There are serious errors in the
application of Standard Written English that impact clarity and effectiveness
and/or severe West Writing Style Handbook format violations.
|
Section score: XX
of 8.98 points
|
Solution: FINANCE-Find and read 2 articles about a recent merger or acquisition