Fin320 Final Project Part III 2017

Critical Elements

Exemplary

Proficient

Needs Improvement

Not Evident

Value

School Versus Work:

Accurately calculates the worth

Calculates the worth of stocks,

Does not calculate the worth of

11.88

Finance Your Education

of stocks, bonds, and

bonds, and combinations of

stocks, bonds, and combinations

combinations of stocks and

stocks and bonds, but calculation

of stocks and bonds (0%)

bonds, including the appropriate

is inaccurate or appropriate data

data and calculations with

and/or calculations are not

submission (100%)

included in submission (55%)

School Versus Work:

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

Comprehensively differentiates

Differentiates the advantages and

Does not differentiate the

11.88

Advantages and

provides historical data, as well

the advantages and

disadvantages of selling a

advantages and disadvantages of

Disadvantages

as quantitative data, to support

disadvantages of selling a

combination of stocks and bonds,

selling a combination of stocks

answer (100%)

combination of stocks and bonds

but analysis is not comprehensive

and bonds (0%)

and provides support for answer

or support is cursory or missing

(85%)

(55%)

School Versus Work:

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

Examines choice to sell stocks,

Examines choice to sell stocks,

Does not examine choice to sell

7.92

Choose to Sell

supports examination with

bonds, or combination of both,

bonds, or combination of both,

stocks, bonds, or combination of

quantitative data (100%)

explaining the financial

but explanation of the financial

both (0%)

reasoning behind the choice

reasoning behind the choice is

(85%)

cursory or missing (55%)

School Versus Work:

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

Examines choice to accept the

Examines choice to accept the

Does not examine choice to

7.92

Accept the Job

supports examination with

job, explaining the financial

job, but explanation of the

accept the job (0%)

quantitative data (100%)

reasoning behind the choice

financial reasoning behind the

(85%)

choice is cursory or missing (55%)

Bonus Versus Stock:

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and

Accurately calculates the best

Calculates the best choice of

Does not calculate the best choice

11.88

Offered

explanation of the best choice

choice of receiving a cash bonus

receiving a cash bonus versus

of receiving a cash bonus versus

demonstrates nuanced

versus receiving company stock,

receiving company stock, but

receiving company stock (0%)

understanding of the time-value

including an explanation of the

calculation is inaccurate or

of money (100%)

best choice (85%)

explanation of best choice is

cursory or missing (55%)

Bonus Versus Stock:

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and

Comprehensively analyzes the

Analyzes the advantages and

Does not analyze the advantages

11.88

Advantages and

analysis includes quantitative

advantages and disadvantages of

disadvantages of the cash and

or disadvantages of the cash and

Disadvantages

data (100%)

the cash and stock options,

stock options, but analysis is not

stock options (0%)

supporting each option (85%)

comprehensive or support for

each option is cursory or missing

(55%)

Bonus Versus Stock:

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

Chooses cash or stock option,

Chooses cash or stock option,

Does not choose cash or stock

7.92

Choose

supports choice with

including logical financial

including financial reasoning

option (0%)

quantitative data (100%)

reasoning behind the choice

behind the choice, but reasoning

(85%)

is illogical or missing (55%)

Compliance:

Meets “Proficient” criteria and

Comprehensively analyzes the

Analyzes the influence of

Does not analyze the influence of

11.88

Investigating

references demonstrate

influence of noncompliance on

noncompliance on potential

noncompliance on potential

knowledge of current events in

potential employees and

employees and potential

employees or potential

finance (100%)

potential shareholders, including

shareholders, but analysis is not

shareholders (0%)

references to statutes and laws

comprehensive or support does

in analysis (85%)

not include references to statutes

or laws (55%)

Compliance: Accepting

Meets “Proficient” criteria, and

Comprehensively analyzes the

Analyzes the federal and

Does not analyze the federal and

11.88

analysis demonstrates nuanced

federal and shareholder

shareholder requirements

shareholder requirements

understanding of requirements

requirements necessary for a

necessary for a financial manager

necessary for a financial manager

for compliance with federal laws

financial manager to become

to become familiar with in order

to become familiar with in order

(100%)

familiar with in order to ensure

to ensure compliance, but

to ensure compliance (0%)

compliance (85%)

analysis is not comprehensive

(55%)

Articulation of

Submission is free of errors

Submission has no major errors

Submission has major errors

Submission has critical errors

4.96

Response

related to citations, grammar,

related to citations, grammar,

related to citations, grammar,

related to citations, grammar,

spelling, syntax, and

spelling, syntax, or organization

spelling, syntax, or organization

spelling, syntax, or organization

organization and is presented in

(85%)

that negatively impact readability

that prevent understanding of

a professional and easy to read

and articulation of main ideas

ideas (0%)

format (100%)

(55%)

Earned Total

100%