Excelsior NUR662 2022 March Module 6 Discussion Latest

NUR662 ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN NURSING EDUCATION

Module 6 Discussion

Course Review in an Academic or Non-Academic Setting

In your discussion, you review an on-line course or a course/program using a modified Quality Matters template, which are provided to you. You summarize your findings and make recommendations for improvement.

Discussion Question

In this discussion forum, you can choose to evaluate an academic OR a non-academic educational course/ program.

If you choose to evaluate an Academic Program,

You can choose between evaluating this on-line course, which you are currently taking or another on-line course you have access. Use the QM template [DOCX, file size 32 KB] to conduct this course evaluation.

This discussion focuses on three steps, which include:

Using the QM template [DOCX, file size 32 KB], evaluate an on-line course.

Share your evaluation with your classmates by submitting your completed evaluation including a summary of your findings and recommendations for improvement.

Non-academic settings have embraced Interprofessional education (IPE) for several years. Academic settings have been slower to adopt IPE, yet there is an urgency for programs to join this important initiative. To further understand and evaluate IPE, view Interprofessional Education – A Conversion with IPE Scholars (Links to an external site.) video. After viewing the video, consider how you would evaluate the course you reviewed for the discussion if it were an interprofessional academic course offering. What recommendations would you make so the course could be adapted for IPE?

Respond to your classmates with feedback on their evaluations, substantiating their findings and or providing alternative recommendations, supported with current evidence.

If you choose to evaluate a Non-Academic program,

Evaluate Learning module 10: Interprofessional education (IPE): Learning for practice. (Links to an external site.) on the QSEN website. Use the QM template for evaluation of continuing and professional education to conduct this evaluation. This template is different from the template used the academic course evaluation. The template used in this module is focused on evaluation of continuing education and professional development programs.

This discussion focuses on three steps, which include:

Using the QM Continuing and Professional Education template [DOCX file size 30 KB], evaluate QSEN learning module 10 on interprofessional education. (Links to an external site.) Click on the content tab and view all three slide shares to conduct your evaluation.

Share your evaluation with your classmates by submitting your completed evaluation including a summary of your findings and recommendations for improvement.

Respond to your classmates with feedback on their evaluations, substantiating their findings and or providing alternative recommendations, supported with current evidence.

Non-academic settings have embraced Interprofessional education (IPE) for several years. Academic settings have been slower to adopt IPE, yet there is an urgency for programs to join this important initiative. In order to further understand and evaluate IPE, view Interprofessional Education – A Conversion with IPE Scholars. (Links to an external site.) video. After viewing the video, consider how the course your peers evaluated would be viewed if it were an interprofessional academic course offering. What recommendations would you make so the course could be adapted for IPE?

Post your primary response. Read any postings already provided by your instructor or fellow students. Read and respond to the conclusions drawn by at least two of your classmates. Remember to read the feedback to your own major postings and reply to it throughout the module.

You are expected to participate in academic conversations with peers and faculty to generate scholarly dialogue. Expectations for participation in the course discussions are described under the Discussion Rubric: Exploration, Spirit of Inquiry, and Engagement (interactions) when relating your experiences, opinions, viewpoints, and ideas supported by evidence.

Consult the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. It is recommended that you write your post in a document first. Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to make your initial post, click on "Reply." Then copy/paste the text into the message field, and click “Post Reply.”

To respond to a peer, click “Reply” beneath her or his post and continue as with an initial post.

Evaluation

This discussion will be graded using the discussion board rubric. Please review this rubric, located on the Rubrics page within the Start Here module of the course, prior to beginning your work to ensure your participation meets the criteria in place for this discussion. All discussions combined are worth 40% of your final course grade.