Esay 3 - What constitutes an appropriate role for the judiciar

Question # 00853792 Posted By: wildcraft Updated on: 04/30/2024 12:10 AM Due on: 04/30/2024
Subject History Topic General History Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

Esay 3

Instructions:

\ this esay must be at least 1000 words. Please include a works cited page as well.

What constitutes an appropriate role for the judiciary? Some people argue that courts have become too powerful and that judges legislate from the bench. What does it mean for a court to be activist? What does it mean for a court to show judicial restraint? Although conservatives have long complained about the activism of liberal justices and judges, in recent years liberals have pointed out that conservative judges and justices are now more likely to overturn precedents and question the power of elected institutions of government. Conservatives counter by saying they are simply returning to an older precedent that had been ignored by liberals. If both liberals and conservatives engage in judicial activism, what is the role of the concept of “activism” (perhaps judicial activism is just a term used to describe a court decision you disagree with)?

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00849275 Posted By: wildcraft Posted on: 04/30/2024 12:11 AM
    Puchased By: 2
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Esay 3 - What constitutes an appropriate role for the judiciar...
    Attachments
    Esay_3_-_What_constitutes_an_appropriate_role_for_the_judiciar.ZIP (18.96 KB)

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Whatsapp Lisa