Devry NRS439 Week 5 Research Reading Literature

Question # 00142944 Posted By: spqr Updated on: 11/29/2015 02:57 PM Due on: 12/12/2015
Subject Health Care Topic General Health Care Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

Reading Research Literature

Guidelines and Grading Rubric – Week 5

Purpose

The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, question, design, population, sample, limitations, data collection and analysis.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO #4 and 8)

CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO #4 and 8)

Points:This assignment isworth 225 points.

Due Date:Submit to the Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5.

Requirements

1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library.

Retrieve the following research articles:Make sure you are viewing the full text PDF. If you view the article in HTML format, you may not be able to see the tables and figures that are referenced in the questions.

George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100.

http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live

Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237.

http://proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2012695204&site=eds-live

2. Download NR439_RRL_form and type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your paper does NOT need to follow APA formatting; however, you are expected to use correct grammar, spelling, syntax, and write in complete sentences.

3. Save the file by clicking Save as and adding your last name, e.g., NR439_RRL_Smith.docx.

4. Watch the video on how to complete this assignment. The link may be found on the Week 5 Assignments page.

5. Submit to the Week 5 Reading Research Literature basket in the Dropbox by11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. Please post questions about this paper in the Week 5 Q & A Forum.

Grading Criteria

Category

Points

%

Description

Question 1

10

4%

Identifies the purpose of the research article.

Question 2

10

4%

Identifies the research question implied in the study.

Question 3

10

4%

Describes the research design of the study.

Question 4

10

4%

Identifies and describes the population.

Question 5

10

4%

Was the sample adequate for the research design

Question 6

10

4%

Describe the data collection procedure

Question 7

10

4%

How were the data analyzed

Question 8

10

4%

Describes the limitations in the study.

Question 9

10

4%

Describes the authors’ conclusions.

Question 10

10

5%

How does this advance knowledge in the field.

Question 11

10

5%

Identifies the purpose of the research article.

Question 12

10

5%

Identifies the research question implied in the study.

Question 13

10

5%

Describes the research design of the study.

Question 14

10

5%

Identifies characteristics of quantitative study.

Question 15

10

5%

Was the sample adequate for the research design

Question 16

10

5%

Describe the data collection procedure

Question 17

10

5%

How were the data analyzed

Question 18

10

5%

Describes the limitations in the study.

Question 19

10

5%

Describes the authors’ conclusions.

Question 20

10

5%

How does this advance knowledge in the field.

Style and Writing

25

11%

Names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.

Total

225 points

100%

Grading Rubric

Assignment Criteria

A

(92-100%)

Outstanding or Highest Level of Performance

B

(84-91%)

Very Good or High Level of Performance

C

76-83%)

Competent or Satisfactory Level of Performance

F

0-75%)

Poor or Failing or Unsatisfactory Level of Performance

Pts

Question 1

Purpose

(10 points)

Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

9–10 points

Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article.

8 points

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

7 points

Does not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.

0–6 points

/10

Question 2

Research question

(10 points)

Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

9–10 points

Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

8 points

Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

7 points

Does not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.

0–6 points

/10

Question 3

Research design

(10 points)

Correctly describes the research design of the study

9–10 points

Mostly describes the research design of the study.

8 points

Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

7 points

Does not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.

0–6 points

/10

Question 4

Population

(10 points)

Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

9–10 points

Mostly describesidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

8 points

Somewhatidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

7 points

Does notidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

0–6 points

/10

Question 5

Sample

(10 points)

Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.

9–10 points

Mostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied

8 points

Somewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied

7 points

Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.

0–6 points

/10

Question 6

Data collection

(10 points)

Correctly describes the data collection procedure.

9–10 points

Mostly describes the data collection procedure.

8 points

Somewhat describes the data collection procedure.

7 points

Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands the data collection procedure.

0–6 points

/10

Question 7

Data analysis

(10 points)

Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.

9–10 points

Partially describes how the data was analyzed.

8 points

Minimally describes how the data was analyzed.

7 points

Incorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer

0–6 points

/10

Question 8

Limitations

(10 points)

Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study.

9–10 points

Mostlydescribes the limitations in the study

8 points

Somewhat describes the limitations in the study.

7 points

Incorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer

0–6 points

/10

Question 9

Conclusions

(10 points)

Correctly describes the authors’ conclusions

9–10 points

Mostly describes the authors’ conclusions

8 points

Somewhat describes the authors’ conclusions

7 points

Incorrectlydescribes the authors’ conclusions or does not answer question

0–6 points

/10

Question 10

Advances knowledge

(10 points)

Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

9–10 points

Mostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

8 points

Somewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

7 points

Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question.

0–6 points

/10

Question 11

Purpose

(10 points)

Correctly identifies the purpose of the research article.

9–10 points

Mostly identifies the purpose of the research article.

8 points

Somewhat identifies the purpose of the research article.

7 points

Does not answer the question or provides an incorrect answer.

0–6 points

/10

Question 12

Research question

(10 points)

Correctly identifies the research question in the study, or identifies the implied question, or indicates that no research question was given.

9–10 points

Mostly identifies the research question that the author described.

8 points

Somewhat identifies the research question that the author described.

7 points

Does not answer or fails to identify the research question that the author described.

0–6 points

/10

Question 13

Research design

(10 points)

Correctly describes the research design of the study

9–10 points

Mostly describes the research design of the study.

8 points

Somewhat describes the research design of the study.

7 points

Does not describe the design of the study, or inaccurately identifies it.

0–6 points

/10

Question 14

Population

(10 points)

Correctly identifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

9–10 points

Mostly describesidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

8 points

Somewhatidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

7 points

Does notidentifies and describes in detail the population of the research article.

0–6 points

/10

Question 15

Sample

(10 points)

Correctly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.

9–10 points

Mostly describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied

8 points

Somewhat describes if the sample was adequate for the research design studied

7 points

Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands if the sample was adequate for the research design studied.

0–6 points

/10

Question 16

Data collection

(10 points)

Correctly describes the data collection procedure.

9–10 points

Mostly describes the data collection procedure.

8 points

Somewhat describes the data collection procedure.

7 points

Doesn’t answer the question, or misunderstands the data collection procedure.

0–6 points

/10

Question 17

Data Analysis

(10 points)

Correctly describes how the data was analyzed.

9–10 points

Partially describes how the data was analyzed.

8 points

Minimally describes how the data was analyzed.

7 points

Incorrectly describes how the data was analyzed or fails to answer

0–6 points

/10

Question 18

Limitations

(10 points)

Correctlydescribes the limitations in the study.

9–10 points

Mostlydescribes the limitations in the study

8 points

Somewhat describes the limitations in the study.

7 points

Incorrectly describes the limitations in the study or does not answer

0–6 points

/10

Question 19

Conclusions

(10 points)

Correctly describes the authors’ conclusions

9–10 points

Mostly describes the authors’ conclusions

8 points

Somewhat describes the authors’ conclusions

7 points

Incorrectlydescribes the authors’ conclusions or does not answer question

0–6 points

/10

Question 20

Advances knowledge

(10 points)

Correctly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

9–10 points

Mostly describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

8 points

Somewhat describes how this research advances knowledge in the field.

7 points

Incorrectlydescribes how this research advances knowledge in the field or does not anwer the question.

0–6 points

/10

Style and Writing

(25 pts)

Correctly names file, includes name on paper. Writes in complete sentences with no grammar, spelling, or syntax errors.

23–25 points

One to two errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

21–22 points

Three to four errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax

19–20 points

Five or more errors in grammar, spelling, and syntax.

0–18 points

/25

Total Points = ____/225

Reading Research Literature – Week 5

Type your answers to the following questions using complete sentences and correct grammar, spelling, and syntax. Click Save as and save the file with your last name and assignment, e.g.,NR439_RRL_Smith. Submit to the Week 5 RRL basket in the Dropbox by11:59 pm MT Sunday at the end of Week 5. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment may be found in Doc Sharing.

Title: RRL

Name: [replace this text with your name]

The following questions pertain to:

George, S., & Thomas, S. (2010). Lived experience of diabetes among older, rural people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(5), 1092-1100.

http://search.ebscohost.com.proxy.chamberlain.edu:8080/login.aspx?direct=true&db=rzh&AN=2010620411&site=ehost-live

1) What is the purpose of this research?

2) What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

3) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description.

4) Describe the population (sample) for this study.

5) Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?

6) Describe the data collection procedure.

7) How were the data analyzed after collection?

8) Discuss the limitations found in the study.

9) Discuss the authors' conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?

10)How does this advance knowledge in the field?

The following questions pertain to:

Hunt, C., Sanderson, B., Ellison, K., (2014). Support for diabetes using technology: A pilot study to improve self-management. MedSurg Nursing,23(4), 231-237.

http://proxy.devry.edu/login?url=http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&CSC=Y&NEWS=N&PAGE=fulltext&AN=00008484-201407000-00008&D=ovft&PDF=y

11)What is the purpose of this research?

12)What is the research question (or questions)? This may be implicit or explicit.

13) Did the authors describe the research design of this study? If so, give a description.

14)Describe the population (sample) for this study.

15)Was the sample adequate for the research design that was selected?

16) Describe the data collection procedure.

17)How were the data analyzed?

18)Discuss the limitations found in the study?

19)Discuss the authors' conclusions. Do you feel these conclusions are based on the data that they collected?

20)How does this advance knowledge in the field.

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00137479 Posted By: spqr Posted on: 11/29/2015 02:58 PM
    Puchased By: 5
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Devry NRS439 Week 5 Research Reading Literature...
    Attachments
    NR439_RRL_Form_(1)_(1).docx (34.13 KB)
    Recent Feedback
    Rated By Feedback Comments Rated On
    m...i Rating Good-quality and satisfactory content 08/21/2016
    n...e25 Rating Tutorials helped secure A+ grade 03/07/2016
    jo...eyes Rating Really appreciable tutorial service 12/29/2015

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Whatsapp Lisa