CSU BBA3210 full course (All assessment and case study)

Read the Call-of-the-Question carefully, and follow the instructions for each subject. Prepare four Briefing Papers using the APA Format for Research Papers, and upload them as one document for your response.

Briefing Paper 1: Critical Legal Thinking

Instructions:

· Read AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion – Cheeseman text page 76

· Respond to the three Case Questions found in Cheeseman text page 77

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in the Critical legal Thinking, Ethics, and contemporary Business questions. Argue both sides of each issue.

Briefing Case 2: Law Case with Answers

Instructions:

· Read Minnesota v. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians – Cheeseman text page 16

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether the Treaty Rights of the Ojibwe Native Americans should still be in effect? Argue both sides of this issue.

Briefing Paper 3: Critical Legal Thinking Case

Instructions:

· Read Section 4.3 Physical Examination – Cheeseman text page 80

· Should Robert Schlagenhauf be subject to a Court Ordered medical examination against his will? Argue both sides.

Briefing Paper 4: Ethics Cases

Instructions:

· Read Section 4.6 Ethics – Cheeseman text page 81

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the 3 questions found at the end of Section 4.6. Argue both sides of all issues.

Read the call-of-the-question carefully, and follow the instructions for each subject. Prepare four briefing papers using the APA format for research papers, and upload them as one document for your response.

Briefing Paper 1: Critical Legal Thinking

Instructions:

· ReadBilski v. Kappos, Director, Patent and Trademark Office, -- Cheeseman text page 162

· Respond to the three Case Questions found in Cheeseman text page 162

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in theCritical Legal Thinking, Ethics and Contemporary Business– argue both sides of all three issues.

Briefing Paper 2: Law Case with Answers

Instructions:

· ReadRetail Services Inc. v. Freebies Publishing-- Cheeseman text page 176

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether the Zannons should be compensated for the Patent Office's original mistake? Argue both sides of these issues.

Briefing Paper 3: Critical Legal Thinking Cases

Instructions:

· Read Sections5.8 Supremacy Clause(p. 106);6.6 Negligence(p. 127-128);7.7 Privilege Against Self-Incrimination(p. 153);8.8 Copyright Infringement(p. 178) and6.3 Strict Liability(p. 127)

· Check the decisions of the highest appellate courts for each fact pattern.

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether each of the four subjects affect business in the United States and if so, provide the worst and best case scenarios.

Briefing Paper 4: Ethics Case Instructions:

· Read Section5.10 Ethics– Cheeseman text page 106-107

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the three questions found at the end of Section 5.10. Argue both sides of all issues.

Read the call-of-the-question carefully, and follow the instructions for each subject. Prepare four briefing papers using the APA format for research papers, and upload them as one document for your response.

Briefing Paper 1: Critical Legal Thinking

Instructions:

· ReadPankratz Implement Company v. Citizens National Bankin your Cheeseman textbook on pages 271-272

· Respond to the three Case Questions found in Cheeseman text page 272

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as articulated in theCritical Legal Thinking, Ethics, and Contemporary Business. Argue both sides of all issues.

Briefing Paper 2: Law Case with Answers

Instructions:

· ReadIn re Lebovitzon pages 283-284 of your course textbook. You can read more about the case by visiting the following link:http://www.tnwb.uscourts.gov/opinions/jdl/pdf/jdl20060609nn1.pdf

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the ECPA and on Federal Magistrate Judge Stephen Wm. Smith's arguments. Argue both sides of the issue.

Briefing Paper 3: Critical Legal Thinking Cases

Instructions:

· Read Sections13.6 Priority Security Interests(p. 285);12.1 Good or Service?(p. 261);13.1 Financing Statement(p. 284); and12.8 Risk of Loss(p. 263)

· Check the decisions of the highest appellate courts, if a case is cited, for each fact pattern.

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether each of the four subjects affect business in the United States and if so, provide the worst and best case scenarios.

Briefing Paper 4: Ethics Case

Instructions:

· Read Section13.9 Ethicsin your Cheeseman textbook on page 286

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the 3 questions found at the end of Section 13.9 Argue both sides of all 3 questions.

Read the Call-of-the-Question carefully, and follow the instructions for each subject. Prepare four Briefing Papers using the APA Format for Research Papers, and upload them as one document for your response.

Briefing Paper 1: Critical Legal Thinking

Instructions:

· ReadBank of America, N. A. v. Barr– Cheeseman text page 293-294

· Respond to the three Case Questions found in Cheeseman Text page 294

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in theCritical Legal Thinking, Ethics, and Contemporary Businessquestions. Argue both sides of all issues.

Briefing Paper 2: Law Case with Answers

Instructions:

· ReadEdward A. Kemmler Memorial Foundation v. Mitchell- Cheeseman text page 305-306

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted on what facts the Supreme Court of Ohio based its decision and what could the Partners have done differently that would have changed the decision in this case.

· Provide convincing arguments for both sides of your recommendations.

Briefing Paper 3: Critical Legal Thinking Cases

Instructions:

· Read Sections14.4 Tort Liability; (p. 307)15.3 Liability of a Franchisee; (p. 325)14.2 Liability of General Partners; (p. 306); and15.5 Liability of members(p. 325-326)

· Check the decisions of the highest appellate courts, if a case is cited, for each fact pattern.

· Brief the facts of the cases and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted on whether each of the four subjects affect business in the United States and if so, provide the worst and best case scenarios.

Briefing Paper 4: Ethics Case

Instructions:

· Read Section14.8 Ethics– Cheeseman text page 307

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted on the 3 questions found at the end of Section 14.8. Argue both sides of all issues.

Read the Call-of-the-Question carefully, and follow the instructions for each subject. Prepare four Briefing Papers using the APA Format for Research Papers, and upload them as one document for responses.

Briefing Paper 1: Critical Legal Thinking

Instructions:

· ReadMenendez v. O’Niell– Cheeseman text page 331-332.

· Respond to the three Case Questions found in Cheeseman Text page 332.

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions as noted in theCritical Legal Thinking, Ethics, and Contemporary Businessquestions. Argue both sides of all issues.

Briefing Paper 2: Law Case with Answers

Instructions:

· ReadSmith v. Van Gorkom- Cheeseman text page 348-349.

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on what effect should the fact that Jerome W. Van Gorkom owned 75,000 shares of Trans Union ($55.00 x 75,000 = $4,125,000.00).

· Provide convincing arguments for both sides of your recommendations.

Briefing Paper 3: Critical Legal Thinking Cases

Instructions:

· Read Sections16.6 Dividends(p. 350);17.5 Section 10(b) (p. 371);26.3 Forum-Selection Clause; (p. 550); and16.3 Corporation(p. 349-350).

· Check the decisions of the highest appellate courts, if a case is cited, for each fact pattern.

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on whether each of the four subjects affect business in the United States and if so, provide the worst and best case scenarios.

Briefing Paper 4: Ethics Case

Instructions:

· Read Section16.9 Ethics– Cheeseman text page 351.

· Brief the facts of the case and assume your boss is seeking your opinions on the 3 questions found at the end of Section 16.9. Argue both sides of all issues.