CS620 - Software System Design, Agile and Waterfall project

Course Name: 23SP-

CS620-151HY - Software System Design

Agile and Waterfall project management methodologies are well-known. Software engineers use these methods to design, build, and test their software. Both are widely used in software development, though each is better suited to a specific type of project. After discussing the differences between waterfall and agile development methodologies, I believe Agile would be more appropriate for the project. Agile's iterative and flexible nature allows for better adaptation to changing requirements and promotes effective collaboration within the context of a group project. One example of the benefits of Agile comes from a previous group project in which I was involved.

Our project began with a rather hazy set of requirements. As the development process began, it became clear that the requirements needed to be refined and clarified. We accepted these changes and incorporated able to accept these changes and incorporate them into our iterative development cycles thanks to Agile. We held regular meetings with stakeholders and end- users to collect feedback, which was critical in determining the project's direction. We ensured that the end product met the evolving needs of our stakeholders by continuously adapting and adjusting our approach.

Agile processes can be modified. Sprints are short bursts of work that emphasize agility. Even after the project is completed, the technique allows for multiple paths to be taken. In contrast to Agile, waterfall requires each step to be completed before moving on to the next. This management style is beneficial to teams because it provides a clear path from beginning to end. Even in the final stages of a project, agile allows for change and experimentation. As a result, budgets are more flexible. Waterfall projects frequently have predetermined costs. The budget cannot be changed midway through the project because it is fixed from start to finish. The strategy is better suited to initiatives whose conclusions will be determined by further research or testing.

Waterfall, on the other hand, may not be as effective in this scenario. The progression of a waterfall is linear and sequential, with each stage dependent on the completion of the previous one. It necessitates a well-defined set of requirements from the start, which may conflict with the dynamic nature of group projects. If the project's requirements change significantly during the development process, Waterfall can cause delays and difficulties in accommodating these changes.

Agile, in my opinion, is a better fit for the project due to its ability to handle change in requirements, promote collaboration, and embrace feedback. By using an iterative and adaptive approach, your team will be able to navigate the project's uncertainties more effectively, increasing the likelihood of success.