American Sentinel BSN421 2020 October Module 6 Assignment Latest
BSN421 Leadership and Strategic Planning
Module 6 Assignment
Peer Review
Please use the grading rubric to create an outline of your assignment. Each section of the rubric should be a section of your final paper and could become the headings. Your assignment will be graded based on each element of the rubric. Compare each section of your paper with the rubric to ensure all elements are covered. Then, include an introduction and conclusion to tie the paper together. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
Your professor will assign each of you a presentation of a peer’s to critique.
Find your assigned peer's presentation in Discussion 6 - Question 2 and complete a peer review of your peer’s presentation using the Peer Review Form included in this module.
Then, upload your completed peer review to this assignment, and email a copy to your classmate by the end of week 6 so that they can incorporate your feedback into their final draft of the assignment.
You may write out the review in paragraph format or use bullet points. APA format is not necessary and no reference articles are required, but standard grammar and spelling are expected. Use the grading rubric to complete your assignment. The peer review feedback gained from your classmates will be incorporated into your final project. If you have any questions regarding the assignment please contact your instructor using the Course Help forum.
|
Competency |
13 points |
10 points |
5 points |
0 points |
Points Earned |
|
Introduction: |
Clearly identifies the strengths of the change project in detail |
Identifies strengths of the change project, but not in detail |
Does not clearly identify strengths of the project |
No paper submitted and/or content missing |
/13 |
|
Introduction: |
Specifies areas that need improvement in detail |
Suggests areas that need improvement, but lacks detail |
Mentions areas to improve with little detail |
No paper submitted and/or content missing |
/13 |
|
Six-step change plan: Identifies strengths |
Clearly identifies strengths of the six-step plan in detail |
Identifies some strengths of the six-step plan but lacks detail |
Does not identify strengths of the six step plan |
No paper submitted and/or content missing |
/13 |
|
Six-step change plan: Identifies areas for improvement |
Specifies areas of the six-step plan that need improvement. |
Suggests areas that need improvement, but lacks detail |
Limited or poor suggestions of areas that need improvement |
No paper submitted and/or content missing |
/13 |
|
Summary: Describes the key points of the summary |
Clearly describes all of the key points of the summary |
Describes the key points of the summary, but not in detail |
Does not describe the key points of the summary with any detail |
No paper submitted and/or content missing |
/13 |
|
Summary: Describes areas that could be strengthened |
Clearly describes areas that could be strengthened in detail |
Describes areas that could be strengthened, but not in detail |
Does not describe areas that could be strengthened in a way that is clear |
No paper submitted and/or content missing |
/13 |
|
Competency |
5 points |
3 points |
1 point |
0 point |
Points Earned |
|
Organization |
Organization excellent, ideas clear and arranged logically, transitions smooth, no flaws in logic. |
Organization good; ideas usually clear and arranged in acceptable sequence; transitions usually smooth, good support. |
Organization minimally effective; problems in approach, sequence, support and transitions. |
Organization does not meet requirements. |
/5 |
|
Grammar |
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage correct and idiomatic, consistent with Standard American English
|
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage good mostly consistent with Standard American English; errors do not interfere with meaning or understanding |
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics and usage distracting and often interfere with meaning or understanding |
Grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and usage interfere with understanding |
/5 |
|
References |
References are relevant, authoritative and contemporary. |
Adequate references. |
Minimal use of appropriate references. |
Poor use and/or selection of references not relevant. |
/5 |
|
Competency |
7 points |
5 points |
2 points |
0 point |
Points Earned |
|
APA Format |
Demonstrates competent use of mechanics and APA. |
Minimal APA errors. |
Many APA errors. |
Complete lack of understanding. |
/7 |
|
Total |
/100 |
||||
-
Rating:
/5
Solution: American Sentinel BSN421 2020 October Module 6 Assignment Latest