Kyllo v. United States

Question # 00000236 Posted By: elliemay Updated on: 07/28/2013 03:42 PM Due on: 07/29/2013
Subject Law Topic Constitutional Law Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

75 to 150 words

InKyllo v. United States(2001),the U.S. Supreme Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have beenunknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant. The federal prosecutor argued that thermal imagingdoes not constitute a search because (1) it detects “only heat radiating from the external surface of the house” and therefore there was no entry, and(2) it did not detect private activities occurring in private areas because “everything that was detected was on the outside.”Do you agree with the Court or the Prosecutor? Should what radiates from a private home be protected?

Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00000148 Posted By: mac123 Posted on: 07/28/2013 03:43 PM
    Puchased By: 3
    Tutorial Preview
    The solution of Kyllo v. United States...
    Attachments
    Kyllo_v._United_States_.docx (10.68 KB)
    Recent Feedback
    Rated By Feedback Comments Rated On
    SV...rt Rating Best online tutorial service 08/28/2013

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Whatsapp Lisa