ENG106 All Assignments Latest 2017 August
ENG106 Week 2 Definition Essay First Draft Latest 2017 August
Definition ArgumentEssay Assignment
Goal
Write a1,500-1,750-word
essay usingfive
to seven academic resources in which you argue that a
contested“case” involving
the sale, trade, or donation of human organs fits (or does not fit) within a
given category.A case may
include a specific news article, story, or incident illustrating a dilemma or
controversy relating to the exchange of human organs. The case doesnot need to be a court case.
Directions
Follow these steps when composing your essay:
1. Start by selecting a controversial case found in the media involving the sale, trade, or donation of human organs. For example, an appropriate case might include a story in the news about an organ broker, and the term to define might be “criminal.”
2. Decide what category you think your case belongs in, with the understanding that others may disagree with you about the definition of your category, and/or whether your chosen case matches your category.
3. In the opening of your essay, introduce the case you will examine and pose your definition question. Donotsimply summarize here. Instead, introduce the issue and offer context.
4. To support your argument, define the boundaries of your category (criteria) by using a commonly used definition or by developing your own extended definition.Defining your boundaries simply means naming the criteria by which you will discuss your chosen case involving the sale, trade, or donation of human organs. If you determine, for example, that an organ broker is a criminal, what criteria constitute this? A criminal may intentionally harm others, which could be one of your criteria.
5. In the second part of your argument (the match), show how your case meets (or does not meet) your definition criteria. Perhaps by comparing or sizing up your controversial case to other cases can help you to develop your argument.
This essay isNOT simply apersuasive essayon the sale, trade, or donation ofhuman organs. It is an argumentative essay where the writer explains what a term means and uses a specific case to explore the meaning of that term in depth.
First Draft Grading
· You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of a complete draft.
· Because your first draft is a completion grade, do not assume that this grade reflects or predicts the final grade. If you do not consider your instructor’s comments, you may be deducted points on your final draft.
Final Draft Grading
The essay will be graded using a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations.
Sources
· Include in-text citations and a references page inGCU Style forFIVE to SEVENscholarly sources outside of class texts.
· These sources should be used to support any claims you make and should be present in the text of the essay.
· Use the GCU Library to help you find sources.
· Include this research in the paper in a scholarly manner.
Format
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in theGCU Style Guide, located in theStudent Success Center.
Turnitin
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
· Please be sure your Turnitin score is at an acceptable level before submitting the draft to your instructor.
Submit the rough draft of this assignment to your instructor AND post this draft as an attachment in theModule 2Peer Review Forum: Definitionby Day 3 of Week 2.
GC ENG106 Week 2 Peer Review Assignment Latest 2017 August
ENG-106 Peer Review Worksheet: Definition Argument
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback.To highlight the text and type over the information in the boxes on this worksheet, double-clickon the first word.
Name of the draft’s author:Type Author Name Here
Name of the peer reviewer:Type Reviewer Name Here
Reviewer
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3-5 sentences)of the paper that includes your assessment of how well the essay meets the assignment requirements as specified in the syllabus and the rubric.
Type 3-5 Sentence Summary Here
After a second, closer reading of the draft, answer each of the following questions. Positive answers will give you specific elements of the draft to praise; negative answers will indicate areas in need of improvement and revision. Please be sure to indicate at least three positive aspects of the draft and at least three areas for improvement in reply to the questions at the bottom of this worksheet.
Definition Argument Content and Ideas
· How effectively does the thesis statement identify the main points that the writer would like to make in this definition argument?
· How successfully does the argument focus on explaining and justifying a specific definition?
· If the writer uses resemblance arguments, how successfully were they used?
· How persuasively is evidence used to justify ideas and enrich the essay?
· How effectively does the essay incorporate supporting strategies such as the criteria-match pattern described?
Organization
· How effectively does the introduction engage the reader while providing an overview of the paper?
· Please identify the writer’s thesis and quote it in the box below.
· How effectively do the paragraphs develop the topic sentence and advance the essay’s ideas?
· How effectively does the conclusion provide a strong, satisfying ending, not a mere summary of the essay?
Format
· How closely does the paper follow GCU formatting style?Is it double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman font?Does it have 1" margins? Does it use headers (page numbers using appropriate header function)?Does it have a proper heading (with student’s name,
date, course, and instructor’s name)?
· Are all information, quotations, and borrowed ideas cited in parenthetical GCU format?
· Are all sources listed on the references page in GCU format?
· Is the required minimum number of sources listed?
· Are the voice and tone of the essay effective in characterizing ideas and creating the appropriate mood?If “No,” please provide examples of ineffective or inappropriate voice
and tone.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
· How effectively does the paper incorporate a variety of sentence structures that
strengthen the ideas, create vitality, and avoid choppiness in the writing? Yes No Add optional clarification here
· How would you assess the writer’s diction (i.e., word choice)? Does the writer use active
verbs, concrete nouns, and precise words?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
Grammar and Mechanics
· Does the writer use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling?If “No,” please provide
examples of errors in need of correction.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
· Is the writing clear and comprehensible throughout the draft?If “No,” please provide
examples in need of improvement.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
Three things that I liked about your draft are:
Type First Thing You Liked
Type Second Thing You Liked
Type Third Thing You Liked
Three things that could be improved are:
Type 1st Area for Improvement
Type 2nd Area for Improvement
Type 3rd Area for Improvement
ENG106 week 4 & 5 Benchmark - Cause and Effect Argument Essay Assignment
Cause and Effect Argument Essay Assignment
Goal
Choose a trend or phenomenon related to the sale, trade, or
donation of human organs. The trend or phenomenon should have a definable set
of causes and effects. Write a1,500–1,750-word
argument usingfive
to seven academic resourcesthat persuades an audience to accept
your explanation of the causes and effects of your chosen trend or phenomenon
related to the sale, trade, or donation of human organs.
Directions
Imagine your issue either as a puzzle or as a disagreement. If your issue is like a puzzle that needs to be put together, your task will be to create a convincing case for an audience that does not have an answer to your cause and effect question already in mind. If your issue is like a disagreement that needs to be resolved, your argument must be overtly persuasive because your goal will be to change your audience’s views.
Be sure to examine alternative hypotheses or opposing views and explain your reasons for rejecting them.
This essay is NOT a CASUAL essay. Instead, it is a cause and effectessay. A cause and effect essay explains the causesand effects of a trend or phenomenon involving the sale, trade, or donation of human organs.
First Draft Grading
· You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of a complete draft.
· Because your first draft is a completion grade, do not assume that this grade reflects or predicts the final grade. If you do not consider your instructor’s comments, you may be deducted points on your final draft.
Final Draft Grading
The essay will be graded using a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations.
Sources
· Include in-text citations and a references page inGCU Style forFIVE to SEVENscholarly sources outside of class texts.
· These sources should be used to support any claims you make and should be present in the text of the essay.
· Use the GCU Library to help you find sources.
· Include this research in the paper in a scholarly manner.
Format
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in theGCU Style Guide, located in theStudent Success Center.
Turnitin
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
· Please be sure your Turnitin score is at an acceptable level before submitting the draft to your instructor.
Submit the rough draft of this assignment to your instructor in the assignment drop box AND post this draft as an attachment in theModule 4 Peer Review Forum: Cause and Effectby Day 3 of Week 4.
GC ENG106 Week 4 Peer Review Assignment Latest 2017 August
ENG-106 Peer Review Worksheet: Cause and Effect Argument
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. To highlight the text and type over the information in the boxes on this worksheet, double-click on the first word.
Name of the draft’s author:Type Author Name Here
Name of the peer reviewer:Type Reviewer Name Here
Reviewer
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3-5 sentences)of the paper that includes your assessment of how well the essay meets the assignment requirements as specified in the syllabus and the rubric.
Type 3-5 Sentence Summary Here
After a second, closer reading of the draft, answer each of the following questions. Positive answers will give you specific elements of the draft to praise; negative answers will indicate areas in need of improvement and revision. Please be sure to indicate at least three positive aspects of the draft and at least three areas for improvement in reply to the questions at the bottom of this worksheet.
Cause and Effect Argument Content and Ideas
• How effectively does the thesis statement identify the main points that the writer would like to make in this cause and effect argument?
Type Answer Here
• How successfully does the argument focus on explaining cause and effect?
Type Answer Here
• How persuasively is evidence used to justify ideas and enrich the essay?
Type Answer Here
• How effectively does the essay incorporate strategies that support cause and effect arguments, namely cause and effect chains and inductive reasoning?
Type Answer Here
Organization
• How effectively does the introduction engage the reader while providing an overview of the paper?
Type Answer Here
• Please identify the writer’s thesis and quote it in the box below.
Type Writer's Thesis Here
• How effectively do the paragraphs develop the topic sentence and advance the essay’s ideas?
Type Answer Here
• How effectively does the conclusion provide a strong, satisfying ending, not a mere summary of the essay?
Type Answer Here
Format
• How closely does the paper follow GCU formatting style?Is it double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman font?Does it have 1" margins? Does it use headers (page numbers using appropriate header function)?Does it have a proper heading (with student’s name,
date, course, and instructor’s name)?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• Are all information, quotations, and borrowed ideas cited in parenthetical GCU format?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• Are all sources listed on the references page in GCU format?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• Is the required minimum number of sources listed?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
Language Use and Style
• Are the voice and tone of the essay effective in characterizing ideas and creating the appropriate mood?If “No,” please provide examples of ineffective or inappropriate voice
and tone.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• How effectively does the paper incorporate a variety of sentence structures that
strengthen the ideas, create vitality, and avoid choppiness in the writing? Yes No Add optional clarification here
• How would you assess the writer’s diction (i.e., word choice)? Does the writer use active
verbs, concrete nouns, and precise words?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
Grammar and Mechanics
• Does the writer use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling?If “No,” please provide
examples of errors in need of correction.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• Is the writing clear and comprehensible throughout the draft?If “No,” please provide
examples in need of improvement.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
Three things that I liked about your draft are:
1. Type First Thing You Liked
2. Type Second Thing You Liked
3. Type Third Thing You Liked
Three things that could be improved are:
1. Type 1st Area for Improvement
2. Type 2nd Area for Improvement
3. Type 3rd Area for Improvement
GC ENG106 Week 6 Peer Review Assignment - Proposal Essay Latest 2017 August
Details:
Please follow these steps:
1. Review the “Rubric Peer Review” media piece for information on effective peer reviews.
2. Begin by posting your Proposal Argument Assignment Rough Draft by the deadline toTWOplaces: the Week 6 Peer Review Forum: ProposalAND the Week 6 Proposal Argument First Draft assignment box.
3. Perform a peer review of the draft of the classmate who posted his/her responsedirectly below yours in the Week 6 Peer Review forum. If your draft is the last posted, review the first draft posted. Then, complete the “Peer Review Worksheet: Proposal” (see attachment) to guide your review of a classmate’s paper.
4. You will then need to post your completed Peer Review Worksheet toTWO places: the Week 6 Peer Review Forum: Proposal for your peer to viewANDthe Week 6 Peer Review Assignment for the Proposal Argument Essay assignment box, so the instructor can grade your work.
5. Attach the file with your completed Peer Review Worksheet to the Peer Review Forum: Proposal as a "reply" to the initial post of your peer's first draft.
6. Please note that to participate in the peer review process you must post your essay by 11:59 pm (AZ time) on Wednesday of Week 6.
7. If you do not submit the First Draft or Peer Review Worksheet to both places or if you review the wrong person, you may not receive full credit for this assignment.
ENG-106 Peer Review Worksheet: Proposal Essay
Part of your responsibility as a student in this course is to provide quality feedback to your peers that will help them to improve their writing skills. This worksheet will assist you in providing that feedback. To highlight the text and type over the information in the boxes on this worksheet, double-click on the first word.
Name of the draft’s author:Type Author Name Here
Name of the peer reviewer:Type Reviewer Name Here
Reviewer
After reading through the draft one time, write a summary (3-5 sentences)of the paper that includes your assessment of how well the essay meets the assignment requirements as specified in the syllabus and the rubric.
Type 3-5 Sentence Summary Here
After a second, closer reading of the draft, answer each of the following questions. Positive answers will give you specific elements of the draft to praise; negative answers will indicate areas in need of improvement and revision. Please be sure to indicate at least three positive aspects of the draft and at least three areas for improvement in reply to the questions at the bottom of this worksheet.
Proposal Content and Ideas
• How effectively does the thesis statement identify the main points that the writer would like to make in this proposal?
Type Answer Here
• How successfully does the paper focus on presenting a well-reasoned proposal?
Type Answer Here
• How persuasively is evidence used to justify ideas and enrich the essay?
Type Answer Here
• How effectively does the essay incorporate strategies that support proposals (e.g., categorical, resemblance, ethical claims, and cause and effect claims)?
Type Answer Here
Organization
• How effectively does the introduction engage the reader while providing an overview of the paper?
Type Answer Here
• Please identify the writer’s thesis and quote it in the box below.
Type Writer's Thesis Here
• How effectively do the paragraphs develop the topic sentence and advance the essay’s ideas?
Type Answer Here
• How effectively does the conclusion provide a strong, satisfying ending, not a mere summary of the essay?
Type Answer Here
Format
• How closely does the paper follow GCU formatting style?Is it double-spaced in 12 pt. Times New Roman font?Does it have 1" margins? Does it use headers (page numbers using appropriate header function)?Does it have a proper heading (with student’s name,
date, course, and instructor’s name)?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• Are all information, quotations, and borrowed ideas cited in parenthetical GCU format?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• Are all sources listed on the references page in GCU format?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• Is the required minimum number of sources listed?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
Language Use and Style
• Are the voice and tone of the essay effective in characterizing ideas and creating the appropriate mood?If “No,” please provide examples of ineffective or inappropriate voice
and tone.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• How effectively does the paper incorporate a variety of sentence structures that
strengthen the ideas, create vitality, and avoid choppiness in the writing? Yes No Add optional clarification here
• How would you assess the writer’s diction (i.e., word choice)? Does the writer use active
verbs, concrete nouns, and precise words?
Yes No Add optional clarification here
Grammar and Mechanics
• Does the writer use proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling?If “No,” please provide
examples of errors in need of correction.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
• Is the writing clear and comprehensible throughout the draft?If “No,” please provide
examples in need of improvement.
Yes No Add optional clarification here
Three things that I liked about your draft are:
1. Type First Thing You Liked
2. Type Second Thing You Liked
3. Type Third Thing You Liked
Three things that could be improved are:
1. Type 1st Area for Improvement
2. Type 2nd Area for Improvement
3. Type 3rd Area for Improvement
ENG106 Week 6 & 7 First & Final Draft Latest 2017 August
Proposal ArgumentEssay Assignment
Assignment adapted from Chapter 7 of the textbook.
A Policy Proposal as a Guest Editorial
Write a1,500-1,750-word policy proposalrelated to the sale, trade, or donation of human organs using five to seven academic resources.The policy proposal should be suitable for publication as an editorial in a college or city newspaper or in a publication associated with a particular group, such as a church newsletter or employee bulletin. The voice and style of your argument should be aimed at readers of your chosen publication. Remember to not use first person pronouns (I, me, us, we, our, my, mine) or second person pronouns (you, your, yours) in this guest editorial writing, unless given permission by your instructor.
Your editorial should have the following features:
1. Identify the problem related to the sale, trade, or donation of human organs.
1. Persuade theaudience that you have selected that this is a problem that needs solving; give it presence.
2. Propose action offering specific details to show how the actions will help alleviate the problem.
3. Justify your solution; the reasons why your audience should accept your proposal and act on it.
This essay isNOT simply apersuasive essayon organ sale, trade, or donation. It is an argumentative proposal that offers a practical and justifiable solution to a problem related to organ donation.
First Draft Grading
· You will receive completion points for the first draft based upon the successful submission of a complete draft.
· Because your first draft is a completion grade, do not assume that this grade reflects or predicts the final grade. If you do not consider your instructor’s comments, you may be deducted points on your final draft.
Final Draft Grading
The essay will be graded using a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations.
Sources
· Include in-text citations and a references page inGCU Style forFIVE to SEVENscholarly sources outside of class texts.
· These sources should be used to support any claims you make and should be present in the text of the essay.
· Use the GCU Library to help you find sources.
· Include this research in the paper in a scholarly manner.
Format
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in theGCU Style Guide, located in theStudent Success Center.
Turnitin
· You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
· Please be sure your Turnitin score is at an acceptable level before submitting the draft to your instructor.
-
Rating:
5/
Solution: ENG106 All Assignments Latest 2017 August