Offered Price $10.00

Kyllo v. United States

Question # 00000060
Subject: Law
Due on: 05/22/2013
Posted On: 05/22/2013 07:57 AM

Expert tutors with experiences and qualities
Posted By
Best Tutors for school students, college students
Feedback Score:

Purchase it
Report this Question as Inappropriate
InKyllo v. United States(2001),the U.S. Supreme Court held that using a technological device to explore the details of a home that would previously have beenunknowable without physical intrusion is a search and is presumptively unreasonable without a warrant. The federal prosecutor argued that thermal imagingdoes not constitute a search because (1) it detects “only heat radiating from the external surface of the house” and therefore there was no entry, and(2) it did not detect private activities occurring in private areas because “everything that was detected was on the outside.Do you agree with the Court or the Prosecutor? Should what radiates from a private home be protected?

Tags states united kyllo private home search court prosecutor house entry and2 surface external detects heat radiating detect united agree radiates protected outsidedo detected activities occurring areas constitute imagingdoes supreme previously beenunknowable details explore

Tutorials for this Question
Available for

Kyllo v. United States

Tutorial # 00000016
Posted On: 05/22/2013 08:02 AM
Posted By:
Best Tutors for school students, college students seekinghelp
Expert tutors with experiences and qualities
Feedback Score:
Report this Tutorial as Inappropriate
Tutorial Preview …something xxxx is xxxxxxxx because of xxxx activity or xxxxxxx of xxx xxxxxxxx f xxxx physical…
Kyllo_v._United_States_.docx (13.38 KB)
Preview: because xxx it xxxxxxx “only heat xxxxxxxxx from the xxxxxxxx surface xx xxx house” xxx therefore there xxx no entry, xxx (2) xx xxx not xxxxxx private activities xxxxxxxxx in private xxxxx because xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxx was xxxxxxxx was on xxx outside ”.....
Purchase this Tutorial @ $10.00 *
* - Additional Paypal / Transaction Handling Fee (3.9% of Tutorial price + $0.30) applicable