Strayer PAD 525 public law Week 4 Discussion 1 and 2

Question # 00016753 Posted By: expert-mustang Updated on: 06/03/2014 06:20 AM Due on: 06/03/2014
Subject Political Science Topic General Political Science Tutorials:
Question
Dot Image

"Freedom of Speech." Please respond to the following:

  • Review Texas v. Johnson. Assuming you want to sustain the conviction, make the best argument you can for how that can be reconciled with the First Amendment. Of the opinions that would have sustained the conviction, which do you find most persuasive and why?

  • Evaluating Van Orden v. Perry, as a public administrator, in the rule of law, explain to what extent your beliefs should affect your reactions to the various justices’ opinions.


"Freedom of Information." Please respond to the following:


  • As a public administrator over a particular entity, describe when public officials should be allowed to conduct their activities in secret. Provide an example.


  • Evaluating New York Times v. United States, provide an example in which it may be warranted to violate the morality of the freedom of information by publicizing a secret identity to prove a point. Explain how this example warrants the morality violation.


Dot Image
Tutorials for this Question
  1. Tutorial # 00016199 Posted By: expert-mustang Posted on: 06/03/2014 06:22 AM
    Puchased By: 2
    Tutorial Preview
    on the basis that a group of people who take ...
    Attachments
    Strayer_PAD_525_public_law_Wk4_D1.docx (22.18 KB)
    Strayer_PAD_525_public_law_Wk4_D2.docx (18.62 KB)

Great! We have found the solution of this question!

Whatsapp Lisa