Question
Offered Price $15.00

If you visit Happy Valley, home of Penn State's University

Question # 00140940
Subject: Geology
Due on: 12/26/2015
Posted On: 11/26/2015 03:12 PM

Rating:
4.1/5
Expert tutors with experiences and qualities
Posted By
Best Tutors for school students, college students
Questions:
37092
Tutorials:
37077
Feedback Score:

Purchase it
Report this Question as Inappropriate
Question
9/30/2015

Assessment

Welcome to Exercise #3: The Age of Nittany Valley
If you visit Happy Valley, home of Penn State's University Park campus, you will be in a valley, but there used to be a mountain right over your head. Many other
valleys (although not all) in the folded Appalachians are similar. Mount Nittany is the "bottom" of a fold, and Happy Valley is the "top" of a fold (as seen in the
diagram below).
Most of the rocks in Pennsylvania are sandstone (which erodes slowly in Pennsylvania's climate), or shale and limestone (which erode rapidly in Pennsylvania's
climate). The limestone, most of the shale and some of the sandstone were deposited in a shallow sea, while some of the shale and sandstone were deposited near
the sea. When the proto­Atlantic closed, with Africa and Europe crashing into North America about as rapidly as your fingernails grow, the rocks in the collision
zone were bent (geologists call this folding). If you try to bend your pencil, you'll find that it tends to break at the peak of the bend. The same was true of
Pennsylvania's rocks­breaks or cracks formed at the tops of the folds.
Streams formed in these cracks and cut downward. Then, landslides and other mass­wasting processes widened the stream valleys. Often, the streams cut through
slow­to­erode sandstones and into the faster­to­erode shale or limestone below. Once that happened, the streams cut down quickly, the sandstone blocks fell off
the cliffs left behind, and what had been a mountain peak became a valley. As a new valley formed in a place that had once been a mountain crest, the adjacent
regions that had once been valleys were being eroded more slowly, often eroding down to the resistant sandstones and then eroding more slowly. Eventually, the
former valleys were left higher than the new valleys, so that the former valleys became the new mountains. Today, in central Pennsylvania, you will find that the
mountains have hard­to­erode sandstone on top, while the rocks beneath the valleys are easy­to­erode limestone or shale. The shape of the landscape has long
ago "forgotten" the mountains built during the great collision, and is now controlled mostly by the resistance of the rocks to erosion.
The easy­to­erode rocks under the University Park campus, the rest of Happy Valley, and many other valleys in Pennsylvania are limestone (or a close relative of
limestone called dolomite, but we'll just call it all limestone to keep it easy for you). The limestone often contains caves. The caves are spaces that were left when
the rocks dissolved in water in the ground. Eventually, that water flowed out to creeks and down the creeks to the sea, where shelly critters grabbed the dissolved
limestone and used it to form shells, the raw material for new limestone. As caves formed and their roofs collapsed, and as rocks were dissolved along small cracks
or right beneath the soil without forming caves, the valley floor was lowered.
This exercise is much easier than it may seem at first! Don't panic until you've really tried it. (Don't panic even then; panic doesn't help anything.) Please begin by
studying the diagram below. Please also note that your neighbor may be doing a slightly different calculation than you are­­we have made many versions of each
question in this exercise, with slightly different numbers. The techniques, the difficulty, and the learning outcomes are all the same, and the numbers are similar
enough to allow you to learn the material, but different enough to encourage you to master the exercise yourself. (Copying from a neighbor is also prohibited
because it is academic dishonesty.)
You will only get one chance to submit this exercise so be sure to review your answers carefully before submission. You can, however, save your answers as long
as you do not submit them first. Do not forget to hit the submit button when you are finished. This exercise will NOT automatically submit since there is no time
limit (except to submit it by the due date shown on the calendar). This exercise will be graded automatically.



1.

If you drive for 2 hours, at 60 miles per hour, you will have traveled 120 miles. This is a very common type of calculation, involving three quantities: distance,
rate and time. If you know just two of these three quantities, you can always calculate the third. Thus, if you want to know how much time it is going to take
you to get somewhere, and you know that the distance is 120 miles and you will drive at a rate of 60 miles per hour, you can divide the 120 miles by the 60
miles per hour and obtain a time of 2 hours.

https://cms.psu.edu/Section/Assessment/Delivery/AssessmentAll.aspx?entryId=4D063A25A8DD4B769C092382F4D74F4A

1/3

9/30/2015

Assessment

For this exercise, you will be relating distance, rate and time. The distance we will work with is the depth of Happy Valley. (Remember that even more rock has
been removed than the depth of the valley, because the site of the modern valley once was higher than the site of the modern mountain, and the site of the
modern mountain has been lowered somewhat as well. And, the rocks had to be deposited, raised and bent before the erosion could occur. So, you're
calculating how much time was involved in a small part of the much longer history of central Pennsylvania.) We can measure how rapidly rock is being
dissolved and washed out of Happy Valley, and use some fairly simple physical ideas to turn that into the rate at which the valley floor is being lowered. That
gives you a distance (the valley depth) and a rate ( the speed at which the valley floor is being lowered), allowing you to calculate the time that has been used
in the lowering. To get the correct answer, you will calculate the time from which equation:
A) Time=Distance multiplied by Rate
B) Time=Distance plus Rate
C) Time=Distance minus Rate
D) Time=Distance divided by Rate
E) Time=Distance squared multiplied by Rate squared
2.

First, we must calculate how rapidly limestone is being removed from the floor of the valley. Most of the limestone leaving the valley is dissolved in Spring
Creek. Later, we will discuss chunks of limestone being rolled, bounced or otherwise carried out of the valley by Spring Creek, although these are rare. There is
almost no loss or gain of limestone in the wind, and meteorite falls are VERY rare and can be ignored.
About 1 m (just over 3 feet) of rain per year falls on Happy Valley. About two­thirds of this is used by trees and evaporated, and one­third leaves the valley in
Spring Creek. That water which leaves in Spring Creek, called runoff, contains a lot of dissolved limestone, which is picked up from the ground. Spring Creek
water averages about 0.33 kilograms (0.33 kg) of limestone for each cubic meter (1 m3) of water. (1 kg is 2.2 pounds, and 1 m3 is a cube just over 3 feet on a
side), so the limestone in the water weighs 0.33 kg/m3.
If Spring Creek collects a layer of water 0.3 m thick from all of Happy Valley each year (0.3 m3 from each square meter or m2), and each cubic meter of Spring
Creek water contains 0.32 kg of limestone, then how much limestone is lost from each square meter of Happy Valley each year, on average? (Note that the
units are included and calculated properly for you here, but you should understand what was done, and why.) 0.3 m3/m2/yr x 0.32 kg/m3 = __________
kg/m2/yr.
A) .096
B) .0096
C) .36
D) .96
E) .036

3.

The answer from question 2 shows that the rock lost from each three foot by three foot plot of land in Happy Valley each year weighs a bit less than a small
hamburger patty. But, how thick is the layer of rock that is lost each year? We need the density of the rock to calculate the thickness lost. The density of
calcite, the main mineral in limestone, is about 2700 kilograms per cubic meter (2700 kg/m3), which is almost three tons for each three foot cube. (Rock is
heavy!). There is a tiny bit of space between some of the grains in the rock, so let's use 2550 kilograms per cubic meter (2550 kg/m3) for the density. For
simplicity, let's round off the answer from question 2, to obtain one­tenth of a kilogram from each square meter each year, or 0.1 kg/m2/yr (that is 0.22
pounds or 3.5 ounces, which is a bit less than the 4 ounces in a hamburger patty). Dividing this yearly rate at which each square meter of the valley is losing
kilograms of rock by the density in kilograms per cubic meter yields the rate at which the valley surface is being lowered in meters per year (m/yr). The
lowering rate is 0.1 kg/m2/yr divided by 2550 kg/m3 =____________m/yr (note: your calculator probably shows a whole bunch of digits; just choose the
answer below that is closest).
A) 0.000019 (your calculator might also show this as 1.9x10­5 or something similar)
B) 0.000039 (your calculator might also show this as 3.9x10­5 or something similar)
C) 0.39 (your calculator might also show this as 3.9x10­1 or something similar)
D) 0.09 (your calculator might also show this as 9.0x10­2 or something similar)
E) 0.0039 (your calculator might also show this as 3.9x10­3 or something similar)

4.

At its deepest, Happy Valley is close to 330 m (a bit over 1000 feet) deep, and it once was at least as high as the mountains around the valley. Let us call the
thickness of rock removed from the valley each year, your answer in the previous blank, 0.000033 m. Then the depth of the valley, 330 m, divided by the
erosion rate, 0.000033 m/yr, yields the number of years it took to hollow out Happy Valley, __________yr. This should be a large number.
A) 10,000
B) 1,000,000,000
C) 100,000
D) 10,000,000
E) 100

5.

The correct answer to question 4 indicates a lot of years. Could we have really screwed up the calculation, so it is way off? Well, suppose that for all of history
until yesterday, Happy Valley was as wet as the wettest places on Earth. (Making central Pennsylvania that wet is almost impossible, because the wettest
places on the planet have climatic characteristics that are not possible in Happy Valley. But, just suppose.) Then, the stream would have been carrying rock
away faster than we calculated above. In addition, suppose that lots and lots of limestone from Happy Valley has been carried away as chunks in the stream,
again meaning that rock has been removed faster than we calculated. (There is almost certainly a grain of truth to this one, but not a lot; observing Spring
Creek shows that most of the rocks in transport are actually originate in the mountains­­the valley rocks mostly dissolve, and the mountain rocks wash down.
But, just suppose.) Call the time to hollow out the valley, from question 4, an even 10,000,000 (10 million) years. Now, if the rock was actually removed 12
times faster than used in that calculation (about as much faster as is possible with what we just told you), what would the new estimate of the time to hollow
out the valley using this new, faster rate be? ________yr (your calculator may not show exactly what is listed below; if not, take the one that is closest). (If
you're not sure how to proceed, ask yourself this question: if you dig faster, does it take a longer or shorter amount of time to reach the bottom?)
A) 833,333
B) 8,333
C) 120,000,000
D) 12,000
E) 1,200

https://cms.psu.edu/Section/Assessment/Delivery/AssessmentAll.aspx?entryId=4D063A25A8DD4B769C092382F4D74F4A

2/3

9/30/2015

Assessment

6.

In question 4, you estimated the time for lowering the surface of Happy Valley enough to account for the modern difference in elevation between the top of
Mount Nittany and the bottom of the valley. In question 5, you saw that you could change that estimate a good bit. But, to make a 10­fold change in the
estimate, you had to assume things that are really almost impossible, such as making central Pennsylvania one of the wettest places on Earth. We could tweak
the assumptions in the calculation to move the estimate either way by a few­fold (so 10 million years could become 3 million years, or 30 million years, without
too much trouble), but shifting the answer a whole lot further than that requires impossibilities or miracles­­just because we can shift it to 3 million years or
even 1 million years does not mean we can shift it to 10,000 years, which would require digging the valley 1,000 times faster than is happening now, which
nature really cannot do here.
We can say something else important, though. Whatever the time needed for deepening the valley, the geologic story of central Pennsylvania must be much
longer than that time required to deepen the valley, that is only the last act of a long play. The text of this exercise refers to several reasons why we know that
the story is longer than the deepening of the valley. Which statement below describes something indicating that the region is much older than calculated so far
in this exercise? Two of the five answers are correct; pick one of the correct ones for full credit.
A) Mountains are always old.
B) The mountain top is being eroded as well as the valley, so more rock must have been removed from the valley than you calculated to give the modern
difference in elevation between mountain top and valley.
C) Dents in the tops of all the buildings at University Park show that meteorites fall in much faster than the professors admit because we know professors
are liars, the meteorites are carried down the stream, so that means that the time to dig the valley was much more than 10 million years.
D) The rocks needed to be deposited, hardened, and bent before being eroded, and all of that took time.
E) Sea­floor spreading made Death Valley.

Submit



Save and Continue Later



https://cms.psu.edu/Section/Assessment/Delivery/AssessmentAll.aspx?entryId=4D063A25A8DD4B769C092382F4D74F4A

3/3

Tags states university penn home happy valley visit valley limestone happy time rocks rock exercise rate years meter faster mountain year just valleys pennsylvania million calculator question water removed answer sandstone calculate shale miles know calculation calculated submit

Tutorials for this Question
Available for
$15.00

If you visit Happy Valley, home of Penn State's University

Tutorial # 00135444
Posted On: 11/26/2015 03:12 PM
Posted By:
Best Tutors for school students, college students echo7
Expert tutors with experiences and qualities
Questions:
37092
Tutorials:
37077
Feedback Score:
Report this Tutorial as Inappropriate
Tutorial Preview …higher xxxx the xxxx of the xxxxxx mountain, and xxx site xx xxxxxxxxx mountain xxx been lowered xxxxxxxx as well xxxx the xxxxx xxx to xx deposited, raised xxx bent before xxx erosion xxxxx xxxxx So, xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx how much xxxx was involved xx a xxxxx xxxx of xxx much longer xxxxxxx of central xxxxxxxxxxxx ) xx xxx measure xxx rapidly rock xx beingdissolved and xxxxxx out xx xxxxx Valley, xxx use some xxxxxx simple physical xxxxx to xxxx xxxx into xxx rate at xxxxx the valley xxxxx is xxxxx xxxxxxx Thatgives xxx a distance xxxx valley depth) xxx a xxxx x the xxxxx at which xxx valley floor xx being xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx you xx calculate the xxxx that has xxxx usedin xxx xxxxxxxx To xxx the correct xxxxxxx you will xxxxxxxxx the xxxx xxxx which xxxxxxxxxxx Time=Distance multiplied xx RateB) Time=Distance xxxx RateC) xxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx RateD) xxxxxxxxxxxxx divided by xxxxxx Time=Distance squared xxxxxxxxxx by xxxx xxxxxxxx First, xx must calculate xxx rapidly limestone xx being xxxxxxx xxxx the xxxxx of the xxxxxx Most of xxx limestone xxxxxxx xxx valley xx dissolved in xxxxxxxxxxx Later, we xxxx discuss xxxxxx xx limestone xxxxx rolled, bounced xx otherwise carried xxx of xxx xxxxxx by xxxxxx Creek, although xxxxx are rare xxxxx isalmost xx xxxx or xxxx of limestone xx the wind, xxx meteorite xxxxx xxx VERY xxxx and can xx ignored About x m xxxxx xxxx 3 xxxxx of rain xxx year falls xx Happy xxxxxx xxxxx two­thirds xx this is xxxx by trees xxx evaporated, xxx xxxxxxxxxx leaves xxx valley inSpring xxxxx That water xxxxx leaves xx xxxxxx Creek, xxxxxx runoff, contains x lot of xxxxxxxxx limestone, xxxxx xx picked xx from the xxxxxx Spring Creekwater xxxxxxxx about x xx kilograms xx 33 kg) xx limestone for xxxx cubic xxxxx xx m3) xx water (1 xx is 2 x pounds, xxx x m3 xx a cube xxxx over 3 xxxx on xxxxxxx xx the xxxxxxxxx in the xxxxx weighs 0 xx kg/m3 xx xxxxxx Creek xxxxxxxx a layer xx water 0 x m xxxxx xxxx all xx Happy Valley xxxx year (0 x m3 xxxx xxxx square xxxxx or m2), xxx each cubic xxxxx of xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxx contains x 32 kg xx limestone, then xxx much xxxxxxxxx xx lost xxxx each square xxxxx of Happy xxxxxx each xxxxx xx average? xxxxx that theunits xxx included and xxxxxxxxxx properly xxx xxx here, xxx you should xxxxxxxxxx what was xxxxx and xxx x 0 x m3/m2/yr x x 32 kg/m3 x __________kg/m2/yr xx xxxxx 0096C) xxxx 96E) 0363 xxx answer from xxxxxxxx 2 xxxxx xxxx the xxxx lost from xxxx three foot xx three xxxx xxxx of xxxx in Happy xxxxxx each year xxxxxx a xxx xxxx than x smallhamburger patty xxxx how thick xx…
Attachments
SOLN.ZIP (18.96 KB)
Preview not available.
Purchase this Tutorial @ $15.00 *
* - Additional Paypal / Transaction Handling Fee (3.9% of Tutorial price + $0.30) applicable
Loading...