ResearchPaperorExerciseRubricfor the Departmentof ManagementandTechnology

ResearchPaperorExerciseRubricfor the Departmentof ManagementandTechnology
CollegeofBusiness- Worldwide
LevelsofAchievement |
|||||||||
Criteria |
Excellent(A) |
Above-Average(B) |
Average(C) |
Near-Failing(D) |
Failing (F) |
||||
Identification andAnalysisof theMain Issues/Problem |
23to25points Identifies andunderstands allof themainissues in question. Insightful,andthorough analysis of alltheissues. |
21to23points Identifies andunderstands mostof themainissuesin question. Thorough analysis of mostof the issues. |
19to21points Identifies andunderstands someof theissues in question. Superficial analysis of someof the issues. |
17to19points Identifies andunderstands fewoftheissues in question. Incomplete analysis of theissues. |
0to17pointsIdentifies and understands very littleof theissuesin question. Noanalysis ofthe issues. |
||||
Answersto ResearchQuestions |
18to20points Answerstoresearch questionsareclear throughout.Connectionwith classandstudymaterialgoeswellbeyondtheobvious connections amongideas; demonstrates insightand originalthinking. |
16to18points Answerstoresearch questionspresent some irrelevantinformationontopic etc.,but very little;treatment goes beyond obviousconnectionswith class andstudymaterial. |
14to16points Answerstoresearch questionsarevague in places; someirrelevantor distractinginformation. |
12to14points Answerstoresearch questionsareunclear and/or confusing. Treatment is very superficial; papermay be wellwrittenbut says nothing. |
0to12points Doesnot address the researchquestions. Treatment is very superficialandsays very little. |
||||
Organization andCoherence |
18to20points Uses alogical structure appropriate topaper's subject, purpose, audience, thesis,and disciplinary field. Sophisticatedtransitional sentences oftendevelop oneidea fromtheprevious one oridentify theirlogical relations. Itguides the reader through thechainof reasoningorprogression ofideas. |
16to18points Showsalogical progressionofideasand uses fairlysophisticatedtransitionaldevices; e.g., maymove fromaleast to a more importantidea. Some logicallinksmay befaulty, buteachparagraph clearly relates to paper's centralidea. |
14to16points May list ideas orarrange themrandomlyrather than usingany evident logical structure. May use transitions,but they are likelytobesequential(first, second, third)rather than logic-based.Whileeach paragraphmay relateto centralidea,logic is not alwaysclear. Paragraphs have topic sentencesbutmaybeoverly general,and arrangementof sentenceswithinparagraphs may lackcoherence. |
12to14points May haverandom organization,lackinginternalparagraph coherenceandusingfeworinappropriate transitions. Paragraphs may lack topic sentences ormainideas,or maybe toogeneral or toospecific to beeffective. Paragraphs may notall relate topaper's thesis. |
0to12pointsAbsent of any kindof organization.Lacks paragraph topic sentenceandtransitions between paragraphs. Paragraphsdonot relate tothepaper's thesis. |
mgmt-ug_research_paper_exercise_rubric_v2_2013
Linksto Course Readingsand Additional Research |
|||||||||
18to20points Excellentresearchinto theissueswithclearly documentedlinks to class (and/oroutside)readings. Muchmore thantheminimumrequired;effort to explore topicexceeds expectations; useof primary andsecondary sources; allinformation meets quality criteria. Sources interspersedwith writer'sownanalysisorsynthesis;quotesareless than10% of paper;good useofsummary and paraphrase;allsourcesare documented;1-3minor errors(suchas incorrect punctuation). |
16to18points Goodresearchand documentedlinks tothematerialread. Slightly morethantheminimum required;effort toensure breadthanddepth; possiblynoprimary sources; allinformation meets quality criteria. Sources interspersedwith writer'sownwork;quotes areless than20% of paper;gooduseofsummary andparaphrase; allsources are documented;4-6minor errors(suchas incorrect punctuation). |
14to16points Limitedresearchand documentedlinks toany readings. At least theminimumrequired; reasonablebreadthand depthof exploration;1-2 sourceslack quality criteria (i.e.,Wikipedia). 1-2 instances of stringingsourcereferences togetherwithlittleof the writer's ownwork;quotes are25% ormoreof paper;1-2 citationsmissingorwith majorerrors (ex:authors missingorincorrect). |
12to14points Incompleteresearchandlinks to any readings.Less than theminimumrequired; orprovidingonly surface coverage; most sourceslack quality criteria. More than2instances of stringingsourcereferences; quotesare40%ormoreof paper;OR paperincludes fewreferences tosources; 3-4 citations missingorwith majorerrors. |
0to12pointsProvidedno referencesorsupport ofanalysis. Veryfewsources; noattempt toexplorevarious points ofview;all sourceslack quality criteriatotal.No references to sources; OR thereis evidenceof plagiarism;5ormore citationsmissingorwithmajorerrors. |
|||||
Style, Mechanics,and Format |
13to15points Chooseswordsfortheir precisemeaninganduses anappropriatelevelofspecificity. Sentencestyle fitsaudienceandpurpose.Sentences clearly structuredandcarefully focused. Almostentirely freeof spelling, punctuation,and grammaticalerrors. Accurately userequiredformattingstyleandproper referencing |
11to12points Generally uses words accuratelyandeffectively, but may betoogeneral. Sentencesgenerallyclear, structured, and focused, though somemaybe awkwardorineffective.May containafewerrors, whichmayannoy the readerbutnot impede understanding. Accurately userequired formattingstyleandproper referencing |
9to10points Uses relatively vagueand generalwords, may use someinappropriate language.Sentence’s structuregenerallycorrect, butsentences may bewordy,unfocused, repetitive,orconfusing. Usually contains several mechanicalerrors,which maytemporarilyconfuse thereaderbutnotimpede theoverall understanding. Accurately userequiredformattingstyleandproper referencingwith few exceptions |
7to8points Tends tobeingvague and abstract, orvery personal and specific. Usually contains severalawkward orungrammaticalsentences; sentence structureis simpleormonotonous. Usually containseithermanymechanicalerrors orafewimportant errorsthatblock thereader'sunderstanding andabilitytoseeconnections betweenthoughts. Accurately use required formattingstyle andproper referencingwith several exceptions |
0to6points Misuseofwords throughout. Awkward sentences throughout.Difficult toattachathought process. Poorly punctuated, misspelledwords, grammatically abusive.Failtouse required formattingstyleandproper referencing |
||||
mgmt-ug_research_paper_exercise_rubric_v2_2013

-
Rating:
5/
Solution: ResearchPaperorExerciseRubricfor the Departmentof ManagementandTechnology